Sam Hollingsworth

7.2K posts

Sam Hollingsworth banner
Sam Hollingsworth

Sam Hollingsworth

@SearchMasterGen

👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 Dad. 📈 SEO @Lead2Conversion. 📝 Writer @sengineland & @SEJournal. 👔 Former VP @Elevation10k & SEO @Acronym_Media. 🏇Racing X: @SpaTurfWriter

New York Katılım Şubat 2012
3.9K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Sam Hollingsworth
Sam Hollingsworth@SearchMasterGen·
Wake up and chase your dreams.
Sam Hollingsworth tweet media
English
0
1
7
0
Sam Hollingsworth retweetledi
MeekMill
MeekMill@MeekMill·
Claude is helping me organize my whole music career and other businesses in days ... and it's moving my business forward at a high rate! Some tech youngbull I met on LinkedIn gave me a incredible template! Who else can help me with Claude
English
831
598
10.1K
2.4M
Sam Hollingsworth
Sam Hollingsworth@SearchMasterGen·
GIF
Hedgie@HedgieMarkets

🦔 Google is testing AI-generated replacements for headlines and website titles in search results. The Verge noticed their headlines were being rewritten without their input. One example: "I used the 'cheat on everything' AI tool and it didn't help me cheat on anything" became "Cheat on everything AI tool." Google says the goal is to better match titles to user queries and facilitate engagement. They claim if this rolls out widely it won't use generative AI, though they didn't explain what other kind of AI would be rewriting headlines. Google Discover already does this and apparently it "performs well for user satisfaction." My Take Google is now rewriting other people's work and putting it in front of users as if that's what the publisher wrote. The headline is part of the article. It's an editorial choice that conveys tone, angle, and intent. When Google changes "Microsoft is rebranding Copilot in the most Microsoft way possible" to "Copilot Changes: Marketing Teams at it Again," they're not clarifying anything, they're replacing the author's voice with generic slop. The legal question here is interesting. Google has traditionally claimed protection as a platform that indexes and displays content rather than creating it. Once you start rewriting headlines, you're arguably developing content, which gets into Section 230 territory. Publishers whose work gets misrepresented might have defamation claims if an AI-rewritten headline changes the meaning of their article. Google is already driving less traffic to publishers and now they want to edit what little representation those publishers have left in search results. This feels like another step toward a web where Google just tells you what it thinks you should know instead of connecting you to sources. Hedgie🤗

ZXX
0
1
1
525
Sam Hollingsworth
Sam Hollingsworth@SearchMasterGen·
Shitshow dot com
Glenn Gabe@glenngabe

Oh boy, what could go wrong? "With these new capabilities, websites could be almost entirely created and run via AI agents controlled by humans." -> WordPress.com says it will now allow AI agents to draft, edit, and publish content on customers' websites, as well as manage comments, update metadata, and more "All of this is controlled through an interface where the website’s owner explains what they want to do using natural language commands." techcrunch.com/2026/03/20/wor…

English
0
0
0
34
Nathan Gotch
Nathan Gotch@nathangotch·
If your company is not encouraging your employees to use AI every single day, then you're already extremely behind.
English
3
2
11
770
Sam Hollingsworth retweetledi
S.🎧
S.🎧@1ssve·
So nobody notices that Chat GPT is making yall the same flyers?
English
221
2.6K
23.3K
1.9M
Sam Hollingsworth retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Sam Altman said people saying “please” and “thank you” to ChatGPT costs OpenAI tens of millions of dollars a year in compute. 67% of Americans do it anyway. Run the math on why. A 2024 Waseda University study tested LLM responses across politeness levels in English, Chinese, and Japanese. Impolite prompts produced measurably worse outputs: more bias, more errors, more refusals. Moderate politeness consistently beat both extremes. The mechanism makes sense once you see it. Polite prompts pattern-match to higher-quality training data. When you write “Could you help me structure this analysis?”, the model pulls from professional, well-reasoned text. When you write “give me the answer,” it pulls from Reddit. Google DeepMind’s Murray Shanahan explained it simply: the model is role-playing a smart intern. Treat the intern like a colleague, you get colleague-quality work. Bark orders, you get minimum-viable compliance. Now look at the cost side. OpenAI handles over a billion queries daily. Each GPT-4 query uses roughly 2.9 watt-hours, ten times a Google search. But OpenAI just raised $40 billion at a $300 billion valuation. Tens of millions in politeness tokens is a rounding error on a rounding error. 67% of users do it anyway, and 55% of them say it’s because it’s “the right thing to do.” They’re maintaining a behavioral habit that governs every other interaction in their life. The parent who teaches their kid to say please to Alexa isn’t doing it for Alexa. They’re doing it because the alternative is raising someone who learns that being rude gets faster results. Telling 900 million people to stop saying thank you so OpenAI can save 0.01% of operating costs is the most engineer-brained optimization take on the internet. You’re training yourself to treat every interaction as a transaction. And that habit doesn’t stay in the chat window.
Venkatesh@Venkydotdev

STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI STOP SAYING THANK YOU TO AI

English
1.5K
3.3K
28.8K
5.6M
Cyrus SEO
Cyrus SEO@CyrusShepard·
I replaced my entire SEO agency with 8 AI Agents Here's how: I never had an SEO agency
English
43
22
441
37.2K
Joe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing
GOOGLE IS GIVING A VALUABLE #1 RANKING TO A VIBE-CODED, 1-PAGE SPA SITE WITH ZERO QUALITY BACKLINKS AND STOCK PHOTOS that are clearly not from the area on a local landscape query that gets up to 1,000 searches per month according to Google Ads: This is absolutely disgusting by @Google and completely defenseless. @Ahrefs says there are 10 linking sites, all spam. 👉 No citations 👉 No actual physical address 👉 A local VOIP number 👉 Hotlinked images from Unsplash 👉 Broken social icons in the footer 👉 "Edit with Loveable" tag visible in bottom right corner 👉 No reviews / testimonials 👉 Broken links / CTAs 👉 No updates in 2-years 👉 Nothing but spam links 👉 No supporting content found anywhere else Literally nothing about this website is remotely good SEO, but Google's head of technology hates SMBs so much he had them build an algorithm where this crap is #1 on a highly competitive, highly valuable keyword. Trash company.
Joe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing tweet mediaJoe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing tweet mediaJoe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing tweet mediaJoe Youngblood - SEO, Futurology, AI, Marketing tweet media
English
34
3
82
21.1K
Doug Kyed
Doug Kyed@DougKyed·
My opinion on the Stefon Diggs release: Felt unlikely that the Patriots would get the same level of production out of him next season, and there was a clean out in the contract. The Patriots feel one of their needs is offensive firepower, however, so they need a plan to replace him.
English
21
12
359
43.9K