Tomer Bariach

2.1K posts

Tomer Bariach banner
Tomer Bariach

Tomer Bariach

@TBariach

Building @Textileprotocol GP @Flori Ventures, Mediocre artist

Israel/crypto confrence Katılım Temmuz 2022
665 Takip Edilen405 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
A moment of celebration 🎉 Today we launch Textile. The entrepreneurial journey is a lonely roller coaster, which is why moments of celebration must be fully embraced. Grateful to share it with @be4oit. Textile is live.
Textile Credit@Textileprotocol

Textile is live ⚡️ Private credit, now programmable. Credit companies can deploy pools in minutes. Capital providers can discover yield opportunities. Trust flows on-chain. Welcome to internet credit markets 🧵 app.textilecredit.com

English
18
8
46
4.3K
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
@talamobile If you're the best borrower in the world, capital prividers aren't really competing for you. You're usually siloed inside a single credit facility. Turning micro-lending into a market changes that. I explain it in deep here check this link @tomerbariach/breaking-the-silo-uncollateralized-credit-becomes-a-market-95bdc5ace358" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@tomerbariach/… 2/4
English
2
0
1
31
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
Excited for this one. We're working with a company willing to push the edge further. With @talamobile we're bringing everything on-chain. Capital provider → Tala Tala → End borrower All using stablecoins. Why should you care? 1/4
Celo@Celo

This just in: Leading credit infrastructure platform @Talamobile & onchain private credit platform @TextileProtocol to launch an open credit pool on Celo! Announced at @CoinDesk's @Consensus2026, the pool structured by Tribeca Park Capital will target $25M in liquidity

English
1
1
4
81
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
@talamobile And capital providers? Debt investors want: 1. Skip balance sheet 2. Exposure only to a slice of the loan tape 3. Covenants triggered by live data Traditionally, this setup is expensive and slow. Turning credit facilities into smart contracts changes that
English
0
0
1
12
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
If you’re the best borrower in the world, capital providers aren’t really competing for you. You’re usually siloed inside a single credit facility. Turning micro-lending into a market changes that. 2/n @tomerbariach/breaking-the-silo-uncollateralized-credit-becomes-a-market-95bdc5ace358" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@tomerbariach/…
English
0
0
0
12
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
Anyone knows who’s the guy in the middle? Sounds like he is working on something amazing
Tomer Bariach tweet media
English
2
0
2
97
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
@jessepollak Sorry but Fiat to Fiat is not wallet to wallet The question should be Fiat to Fiat using usdc vs Fiat to Fiat without
English
1
0
2
114
jesse.base.eth
jesse.base.eth@jessepollak·
"Rail #1: USDC on Base: 2 seconds, $0.01 fee"
Gap | Suby@gaspardlezin

I sent €5,000 across 8 payment rails. The fastest arrived in 2 seconds. The slowest took 5 days. And the fees? $235 difference on the exact same transfer. Here's what that experiment taught me about the future of money. Rail #1: USDC on Base: 2 seconds, $0.01 fee The recipient received $5,882.50. Rail #8: SWIFT Wire: 5 days, $25 + 1.5% FX markup The recipient received $5,794.26. Same sender. Same recipient. Same €5,000 on Monday. One settled before I closed my laptop. The other arrived on Friday. 𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝘇𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝗼𝘂𝘁. In 2025, stablecoins processed $33 trillion in volume. Visa processed $16.7 trillion. For the first time in financial history, a "crypto" rail moved more value than the world's largest card network. Most people missed it. The financial press barely covered it. But inside every major payment company, someone is reading those numbers and losing sleep. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗶𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 Ask anyone: "Is paying by card instant?" They'll say yes. They're wrong. What's instant is the authorization, the 2-second green checkmark that tells the merchant "this card is legit." The actual money? It sits in batch processing queues for 1 to 3 days, hopping between acquirers, schemes, and issuing banks on infrastructure built in the 1970s. Stablecoins collapse that gap. Authorization and settlement happen in the same transaction. No T+2. No batch windows. No correspondent banks taking a cut. That's why the fee on my €5,000 transfer dropped from $25+ to $0.01. 𝗪𝗵𝗼'𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘄𝗵𝗼? Most people frame this as "crypto vs banks." It's not. The real war is: - Stablecoin rails vs Visa & Mastercard (the interchange model) - Stablecoin rails vs Swift (correspondent banking) - Stablecoin rails vs Stripe (merchant acquiring) And the incumbents know it. Mastercard added Polygon Labs, Ripple, Solana, and Aptos to its Crypto Partner Program. Visa is already settling USDC through Circle. PayPal shipped its own stablecoin (PYUSD). They're publicly calling stablecoins a threat while privately integrating them into their stack. Classic frenemy move. APMs were the first wave. Stablecoin rails are the second. Huge thanks to Benji Audigé for the great work he put into this during the hackathon I organized 🫡 PS: I post weekly about payments, stablecoins, and the reality of building a payment startup. Follow for more!

English
46
44
303
29.6K
Hadar
Hadar@HadarRot·
@TBariach @ryonnixon maybe that's because nvidia has a propriety product with low amount of competitors and it generates revenue for its share holders. while ethereum has many competitors, no significantly better tech (that actually matters) and it barely generates profits
English
1
0
2
26
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
@ryonnixon But price action is coming from 1. actual business 2. expectation on actual business we agree on the problem on expectation, i believe the problem is even bigger - there's not a single leading usecase that wasn't part of a 2017 whitepaper
English
1
0
0
14
ryonnixon
ryonnixon@ryonnixon·
@TBariach Sure. But its really about the price action. When stocks trade down doesn't mean they don't have PMF.
English
1
0
1
19
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
@ryonnixon not finding product market fit is harsh saying i take it back, cross border payments are amazing use case, but insufficient to fill the amount of block-space created. and we have gambling under many different names
English
0
0
0
8
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
@ryonnixon isn't it the other way around? we don't find actual product market fit for the industry and that's why we are losing money
English
2
0
0
26
Haseeb >|<
Haseeb >|<@hosseeb·
@beaniemaxi Depositors lost billions? What? I think you have missed some headlines. AAVE depositors are now able to withdraw, and Drift users were not chasing 4% APYs...
English
9
0
63
8.8K
Beanie
Beanie@beaniemaxi·
DeFi is a scam. Depositors have lost literally billions of dollars this year chasing 4% APY. They were told there's no risk by founders and VCs. These are the only winners other than the hackers. No reprecussions for negligence and outright lying. Crypto isn't a serious industry.
English
78
20
357
31.2K
Dan Robinson
Dan Robinson@danrobinson·
I agree that DeFi lenders seem to be underpricing risk. Most blue-chip yields are lower than the risk-free rate you can earn from money market funds! Even for lenders who don’t have access to Treasury yields, it surprises me that they take those risks to earn ~3% on stablecoins But that doesn’t mean rates “should” be higher. You have to take demand into account. There is already limited borrow demand; if rates were >10% there would be almost no borrowing Unfortunately the equilibrium might just be a low quantity supplied in DeFi
Tom Dunleavy@dunleavy89

x.com/i/article/2047…

English
22
6
127
29.1K
chainyoda
chainyoda@chainyoda·
Aave recovery is the same as saving the entire crypto industry.
English
19
7
131
5K
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
@mert There’s a bit difference between having something for profit, and turning it into a full tradable assets, adding speculation to an asset gives it a huge price premium
English
0
0
2
127
Tomer Bariach
Tomer Bariach@TBariach·
@reidlikeabook @danrobinson I agree but one correction “Nowhere better to park stables onchain WITHOUT kyc” Which frames the problem a bit differently
English
1
0
0
27
Reid
Reid@reidlikeabook·
the 3% isn’t credit mispricing. They’re only price takers. it’s where stable borrow demand from delta-neutral basis trades clears against perp funding. MMF yields are irrelevant because the marginal borrower isn’t comparing to t-bills, they’re comparing to funding rate spreads. supply just shows up because there’s “nowhere better to park stables on-chain.” THIS is the problem!
English
2
0
8
445
David Hoffman
David Hoffman@TrustlessState·
Bring back Single-Collateral DAI
English
29
8
197
11.4K
Jonny Dee
Jonny Dee@0xJonnyDee·
Instead of DeFi protocols dropping articles blaming others rather than owning up to hacks, can we get diss tracks? At least it would be more entertaining.
English
15
0
44
771