Heather R. Higgins

19.6K posts

Heather R. Higgins

Heather R. Higgins

@TheHRH

@IWV CEO, @IWF Chairman, mom of 6 - 3 20 somethings, 3 four-foots at home. Civility + rationality required. Join me on @IWN community.

Katılım Ağustos 2009
4K Takip Edilen177.1K Takipçiler
Heather R. Higgins
super important to understand
The All-In Podcast@theallinpod

David Sacks: Nonprofits need to manufacture problems in America to stay in business David Sacks: “Here's the systemic problem with nonprofits and NGOs. Let me just contrast it with business. In business, you set up a company, the company has to make revenue, it has to make profits. And if it doesn't, it's going to go out of business, right? Because it'll lose money. So there's a feedback mechanism from the market. With an NGO, nonprofit, what have you, they raise money. They don't sell things. They fundraise from donors in order to engage in an activity, but what happens over time is the actual activities may stop mattering, and all that really matters is they're able to keep fundraising, right? Because they're just trying to figure out a justification to keep going back to donors to get more and more money out of them. That's what perpetuates the organization.” Chamath: “ Why wouldn't the Southern Poverty Law Center focus on southern poverty? Which is an issue that actually still exists in some shape or form. Why do you call it one thing, focus on racism, and then all of a sudden whip up fake racism?” Sacks: “I do think that at one time in this country, civil rights was a noble cause, a very legitimate cause. We had the legacy of segregation and Jim Crow, and there were groups that were set up to basically change that, and they succeeded. But again, no one in an NGO or a nonprofit ever declares victory. When Obama got elected in 2008, regardless of whether you liked Obama or not, or agreed with his politics, I thought that at that point, most people could see that this was not a racist country. Whatever else you could say, the fact that the highest office in the land was not denied to anybody showed that this country was not holding people back based on their skin color. And instead of just basically packing up shop and saying, ‘Okay, we've achieved our goal,’ the goalposts all got moved. Remember, that's when the whole anti-racism thing started, was around Obama's second term. If they just said at that time, ‘You know what, we're going to move the goalposts from equality of opportunity to equality of results. We're going to basically make everyone equal at the finish line,’ which is to say, identity socialism. People would've said, ‘Eh, no, we're not on board for that.’ So instead, they created this whole new terminology to justify it. And it's taken us years to unpack that and realize what's really going on.”

English
0
0
0
825
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker@sapinker·
We should oppose the Trump administration's abuse of the law to intimidate and cripple private advocacy organizations they don't like. But what they say about the Southern Poverty Law Center (which I used to donate to) is, unfortunately, correct: It “long ago abandoned civil rights work and turned into a partisan smear machine.” Among the targets in its McCarthyite "Hate Watch" list are ordinary academic behavioral geneticists whose research challenges the blank slate. nytimes.com/2026/04/22/us/…
English
0
1.1K
4.7K
940.5K
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
Cleta Mitchell
Cleta Mitchell@CletaMitchell·
this is the great @rachelbovard explaining the complete BS spouted by Senate leadership as to why a talking filibuster simply cannot be accomplished to pass the SAVE America Act...'too many amendments' 'we can't handle that...' turns out the Senate just went through it....took 6 hours? @EIWatchdogs x.com/rachelbovard/s…
English
12
156
310
4.1K
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
Coach Tommy Tuberville
Coach Tommy Tuberville@SenTuberville·
I don’t give a RIP what the D.C. SWAMP thinks about me. I am not afraid to ruffle some feathers to get something done. Now is not the time to bend the knee to outdated Senate traditions. NUKE THE FILIBUSTER. The American people are counting on it. 1819news.com/news/item/u-s-…
English
1.4K
3.1K
10.2K
69.2K
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
Dr. Maalouf ‏
Dr. Maalouf ‏@realMaalouf·
HEARTBREAKING: Her 10-month-old baby was cut in half with a knife in front of her, her husband shot dead, and she watched them split her second child's skull with a machete. They also amputated one of her hands. This is life for Christians in Nigeria. The media remains silent.
English
1.6K
14.8K
32.8K
754.5K
Heather R. Higgins
Heather R. Higgins@TheHRH·
lovely if accurate and not just wishful thinking
Denver Fail@mrosazza

Virginia was a trap, and the Democrats fell right into it. Dems rushed the April 21 special election to exploit the narrow pre-EO window before Trump’s March 31 citizenship-verification/USPS-tracking order fully hardened the mail stream. A small data-science team (with pre-existing voter rolls + ERIC padding + AI) generated and externally inserted subtle synthetic “ghost” ballots into the USPS flow, targeting high-mail NoVA counties like Fairfax. The late blue shift delivered the narrow YES (~51.45%, ~89k margin, just over recount bar), including the viral “exact 35k” Fairfax absentee batch. Trump’s team (data scientists who already modeled the exact cheating vectors from the rolls) had people monitoring Fairfax/USPS in real time. They let the fake ballots get counted — preserving the chain of custody and the official tally. Once certified, the trap springs: subpoena the physical ballots and USPS records via FISA court on national-security grounds (foreign interference / election integrity as a critical infrastructure threat). The trackable envelopes + EO-mandated lists create the forensic hook. This proves systemic ghost-ballot injection at scale — not isolated fraud, but a repeatable, AI-enabled operation blending into the blue-shift pattern. With ironclad proof in hand, it forces passage of the SAVE Act (proof-of-citizenship for registration/ballots) through Congress, hardens the entire system nationwide, and delivers the historic backfire: Dems’ rushed map grab becomes the catalyst that exposes and kills the playbook permanently. Trump’s loud April 20 framing + post-results quiet was operational security while the monitoring and legal machinery ran. The Virginia Supreme Court process challenge (April 27 arguments) is the visible lever; the USPS/FISA subpoena is the silent kill shot. Its time to take our State back Colorado! #copolitics #freetinapeters

English
0
1
3
680
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
Congressman Rich McCormick, MBA MD
DC Bureaucrats hijacked Virginia… but we will restore it. Arlington and Alexandria were always meant to be a part of DC. That’s why I introduced the Make DC Square Again Act, because it’s a simple concept: DC = 🟥
English
853
931
6K
1.1M
Heather R. Higgins
Heather R. Higgins@TheHRH·
There’s a certain class of commentator—overrepresented on cable panels and cocktail parties—that insists the central question of our moment is tone. Not outcomes. Not deterrence. Not whether fewer people die. Tone. Which is how we end up in the peculiar position of litigating the president’s phrasing while largely ignoring the far more relevant question: does it work? This isn’t an argument for crudeness as a virtue. It’s an argument for weighing costs and benefits as a higher moral obligation. We’ve run the “measured, respectful, diplomatic” playbook for decades. Forty-seven years, give or take. And what has it yielded? More proxy wars. More state-sponsored terrorism. More hostage crises. More regimes chanting “Death to America” (without apparent objection from the “tone matters” crowd), while steadily improving their missile range and nuclear capability. Allies without militaries that we must pretend are equal partners. Insisting on refined language in the face of those results stops looking like principle and starts looking like irresponsibility, cowardice, or stupidity. Civil language presumes a civil audience. That’s not a controversial statement—it’s just reality. Diplomats respond to nuance. Allies respond to reassurance. But ideologues—especially the kind who come from a hyper masculinized culture where you’re not taken seriously until you’re talking about ripping off heads and crushing countries—don’t parse tone. They parse strength. They test boundaries. And they respond, when they do respond, to clarity backed by credible consequence. To read the rest, go to: Tone Is Not a Virtue realclearpolicy.com/articles/2026/…
English
0
0
1
477
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
James Woods
James Woods@RealJamesWoods·
The failed Russia Hoax was designed to give causation to a bogus impeachment. Here, however, we have actual collusion between a United States Senator and representatives of a nation state enemy. What should be the punishment, if true?
James Woods tweet media
English
7.5K
22.8K
49.7K
782.6K
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
James E. Thorne
James E. Thorne@DrJStrategy·
Food for thought. Welcome to the New Great Game: the closure of the Strait of Hormuz is not an outburst, it is a long‑planned move on a board Washington has been studying for decades. Donald Trump’s Iran gamble is being judged against the wrong baseline. Nobody serious expected regime change by airstrike; the bet of Operation Epic Fury was narrow but brutal, halt Iran’s march to a bomb, break the infrastructure that threatens Americans and allies, restore deterrence and, by closing Hormuz, demonstrate that even in a “multipolar” age the United States can still reach for the world’s most strategic chokepoint. The question is not whether Iran looks worse than in peacetime, but whether it is weaker than the Iran we were otherwise on track to face: near‑weapons‑grade enrichment, hardened sites, ICBMs a tested weapon within a year, and implicitly backed by China. Against that counterfactual, a regime that has lost senior commanders, core nuclear facilities and major war‑making capacity has not “emerged stronger”. Nor did this war suddenly hand power to the IRGC. The Guards have run Iran for years; the conflict stripped away the clerical façade and killed many of their most capable officers. They are not true religious believers but calculating military men, interested in power, money and survival more than theology. Such men can be negotiated with, if the terms strip away their most dangerous options. A discredited IRGC with degraded capabilities and no viable nuclear path is weaker than the old clerical‑IRGC hybrid with a bomb option. This looks less like a revolutionary vanguard and more like a brittle military dictatorship. Venezuela shows why this is not neo‑conservatism in disguise. There, Washington helped force Nicolás Maduro from power with sanctions, isolation and support for the opposition, but it did not send Marines into Caracas or attempt to remake the country in America’s image. The objective was pressure and transition, not permanent US stewardship. The same bounded playbook now applies to Iran: maximum economic and military pressure to fracture the regime from within, not an occupation or bayonet‑installed government. Seen from that perspective, Hormuz is not a shocking improvisation but the central artery in a strategy that has been war gamed out : use control of sea‑lanes and finance to punish Iran first, but also to remind China and Europe that their growth models still depend on flows Washington can disrupt. What cannot be allowed is for this world to turn Iran into a Chinese staging point on the Gulf. The endgame in this first round of the New Great Game is narrow and knowable: no enrichment, real caps on missile reconstitution, no Chinese forward base, no open chequebook for terror, and enough sustained pressure that when the Iranian people finally move, they are pushing against a weakened security state rather than a confident nuclear one. The world has changed; Iran has lost the war, Pax Americana is dead. Trump’s national security doctrine, coercion without occupation, leverage without crusades, is the planned successor, and the Strait of Hormuz is its chosen proving ground. Is the Strait of Malacca next? Why should investors care? Because if this strategy succeeds, it removes a looming nuclear breakout risk, curtails state‑sponsored terrorism, re‑establishes a credible fear of US hard power and, for a time, compresses the geopolitical risk premium that has hung over energy, shipping and global equities for a generation. It offers the possibility, however briefly, of a peace dividend: lower volatility, higher investment and a world that, for a moment, rhymes with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War. In that window, capital will scramble to reprice assets that assumed perpetual Middle Eastern and Nuclear escalation. The New Great Game is not just about guns and chokepoints; it is about who captures that re‑rating.
James E. Thorne tweet media
English
173
575
2.1K
526.8K
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
🧵🚨 THREAD: How the Charlottesville rally and SPLC birthed an entire billion-dollar-plus "democracy" ecosystem 🚨 11 federal counts. Wire fraud. Money laundering conspiracy. But here's what the SPLC headlines are missing: • The indictment describes a paid informant in the leadership chat that PLANNED Unite the Right • That informant "helped coordinate transportation" to the rally... at SPLC's direction • There is ONE publicly identified organizer whose documented role was transportation coordinator • His Discord posts about running over protesters were made 26 DAYS before Heather Heyer was killed by a car • The indictment says postings were made "under the supervision of the SPLC" • Charlottesville then became the founding event for a billion-dollar political machine • SPLC installed itself as that machine's definitional gatekeeper I report. You draw your own conclusions. As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇
DataRepublican (small r) tweet mediaDataRepublican (small r) tweet media
English
409
8.9K
22.7K
494.9K
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
Mike Lee
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee·
I’d love to keep the filibuster and make filibustering senators speak That’s how the filibuster is supposed to work—protecting robust debate in the Senate It no longer does that; it now forestalls debate Enforce the filibuster Or nuke it The status quo empowers Democrats
Rick Scott@SenRickScott

We have to SAVE the SAVE America Act. I’m grateful for American patriots like @BasedMikeLee for not letting up. We must keep up the good fight to deliver SECURE elections for the American people — even if it means BLOWING UP the filibuster. 🇺🇸

English
2.3K
5.9K
25.8K
22.4M
Heather R. Higgins
Heather R. Higgins@TheHRH·
Nothing says "democracy" and "fairness" like cheering 51% taking fair representation away from 49% and overturning VA's 2020 66% approved ballot initiative that redistricting had to be done by a bipartisan commission, not self-serving politicians. Oink oink.
Barack Obama@BarackObama

Congratulations, Virginia! Republicans are trying to tilt the midterm elections in their favor, but they haven’t done it yet. Thanks for showing us what it looks like to stand up for our democracy and fight back.

English
1
1
6
697
Heather R. Higgins retweetledi
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
51% of voters can take away 100% of the rights of 49% of the voters. Democracy.
Cernovich tweet media
English
6.1K
7.8K
42.7K
3.1M