Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠

177 posts

Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠 banner
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠

Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠

@wrongu

Postdoc with @Kordinglab, interested in the intersection of neuroscience, AI, and philosophy.

Philadelphia, PA Katılım Ocak 2012
247 Takip Edilen254 Takipçiler
Daniel Severo
Daniel Severo@_dsevero·
The reviewer is asking us how tight our equality is.
English
14
7
172
39.5K
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠
@ke_li_2021 Oops – I missed that when skimming. Sounds like it fits with some philosophical ideas on counterfactual computational results as a test of "representation." Nice!
English
0
0
0
77
Kenneth Li
Kenneth Li@ke_li_2021·
@wrongu Some board states correspond to no valid input sequences. We found that, if we intervene the model’s board into such states, it can still make legal predictions according to game rule.
English
1
0
0
108
Kenneth Li
Kenneth Li@ke_li_2021·
Preprint: Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Task (Othello-GPT: arxiv.org/abs/2210.13382) How does Large Language Models work? Are they merely memorizing surface statistics or relying on an internal world model? (1/6)
English
3
26
104
0
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠 retweetledi
Daniel Yamins
Daniel Yamins@dyamins·
Counterfactual World Modeling (CWM) is a new project from my group. Our ultimate goal is to build a single unified model that could solve a wide range of human visual tasks in a zero-shot manner -- a kind of pure-vision foundation model. arxiv.org/abs/2306.01828
Daniel Yamins tweet media
English
5
44
247
36.8K
Ramon Nogueira
Ramon Nogueira@RNogueiraNeuro·
Neurotwitter please help! I am looking for a dataset with: 1. Sensory discrimination task (drifting gratings, RDM, etc), 2. Population recordings from relevant sensory area (V1, MT, A1, etc), 3. Recordings and behavior throughout learning (the most important part). Anybody knows?
English
4
1
2
1.1K
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠
@patrickmineault This work is great and we have been extending it! arxiv.org/abs/2206.10999 Elevator pitch: once you start talking about *distance* between neural reps, you can also start talking about *directions*. We can use tools from geometry to talk about how reps are transformed.
English
1
0
5
235
Patrick Mineault
Patrick Mineault@patrickmineault·
What does it mean for a neural network to "be like the brain"? I revisited this paper from Alex Williams and co today, which I think asks the right questions and offers some tantalizing answers. 1/
Alex Williams@ItsNeuronal

A very interesting trend in neuroscience is the emergence of datasets with large-scale recordings repeated across many animals (see e.g. @IntlBrainLab) How to make sense of variability across animals in these data? Our NeurIPS '21 paper has a few ideas arxiv.org/abs/2110.14739

English
6
42
200
62.5K
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠 retweetledi
Patrick Mineault
Patrick Mineault@patrickmineault·
Neuromatch soft-launched its mastodon instance last week. We already have a great local feed, you should totally join our merry neuroscientist/hacker spaceship 🚀 neuromatch.social
English
2
23
87
27.5K
Dr. Rachel Kurchin
Dr. Rachel Kurchin@rachel_kurchin·
🚨 summoning the hivemind! 🐝 I want to have some interactive computational demos in my course next semester, likely in the form of notebooks. I need it to be runnable in a browser without installing anything or waiting excessively for something to spin up, …
English
10
0
5
0
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠 retweetledi
Dr Kate Compton
Dr Kate Compton@GalaxyKate·
declaring a new term: A Bach Faucet is a situation where a generative system makes an endless supply of some content at or above the quality of some culturally-valued original, but the endless supply of it makes it no longer rare, and thus less valuable
English
23
251
1.2K
0
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠 retweetledi
Kording Lab 🦖
Kording Lab 🦖@KordingLab·
Who of the famous people in the field would be ready to publicly talk about their non-rigorous research in the past? I think that few people have ever published 10 papers without major rigor issues in at least one of them. Let's normalize talking about rigor.
English
24
42
219
0
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠
@micahgoldblum Testing my understanding: this is hard constraints (EmpiricalRM) vs soft complexity penalties (RegularizedRM).. Less complex (lower norm) functions take fewer samples to learn even if your hypothesis space is huge, and VC/rademacher depend only on size of the space, right?
English
0
0
1
0
Micah Goldblum
Micah Goldblum@micahgoldblum·
The following statement, while a commonly held view, is actually false! “Learning theory says that the more functions your model can represent, the more samples it needs to learn anything”. 1/8
Yann LeCun@ylecun

OK, debates about the necessity or "priors" (or lack thereof) in learning systems are pointless. Here are some basic facts that all ML theorists and most ML practitioners understand, but a number of folks-with-an-agenda don't seem to grasp. Thread. 1/

English
7
20
164
0
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠
@DimitrisPapail A very similar line of questioning (how to think about composing "simple steps" towards implementing some complex functions) motivated this: arxiv.org/abs/2206.10999 I still have more questions than answers and would be interested to hear what you find out!
English
0
0
1
0
Dimitris Papailiopoulos
Dimitris Papailiopoulos@DimitrisPapail·
Say I want to infer a function f() from its evals. That's hard! But what if f(x) is an "algorithm" comprising T iterations, i.e., f(x) = f_T(...(f_2(f_1(x))) and f_i are "simple" (e.g., low-deg poly?). Do we know how do to recover these f_i's?
English
8
1
18
0
Sam Gershman
Sam Gershman@gershbrain·
I've come across an interesting phenomenon, which I'm sure has been discussed before but I don't know the right references.
English
7
5
30
0
Richard Lange 🌎🤖🧠
@KordingLab @SuryaGanguli Credit where credit is due! AlHazen was ahead of his time. Not sure if he counts as part of the "direct/transparent" link that @SuryaGanguli asked about. Did Helmholtz know about AlHazen? Did the authors of the Helmholtz machine? Or were ideas rediscovered?
English
1
0
1
0
Surya Ganguli
Surya Ganguli@SuryaGanguli·
I want to learn about useful applications of philosophy to science. Other than the scientific method itself, what are concrete examples of philosophy done by “card carrying” academic philosophers that lead, thru a direct/transparent chain of causation, to new successful science?
English
72
33
232
0