
I think you are misperceiving the situation. What I ask for is quite balanced, it's simply that we should have privacy in our digital communications and activities, of a similar type that we had for thousands of years (when we had in-person voice conversations, used cash for payments, etc) It is a minority (far from a majority!) in government and tech industry that is pursuing a type of absolutism, where they openly use phrases like "there should be no place to hide", seeking a kind of utopia (from their perspective) where they have the ability to see everything and nothing is out of bounds. Surveillance of physical space has increased massively over the past decade, thanks to AI and cameras, and on top of that there is the growth of all kinds of internet tracking. It is definitely not the side the wants privacy that is proposing anything unprecedented or extreme. There are many opportunities to improve safety today, mostly around common-sense policing improvements, not carelessly releasing repeat offenders, etc. Meanwhile, intercepted digital messages are a security vulnerability, and there are many easy-to-find stories where mandatory wiretap data collected by one government gets hacked by other governments. We need our physical environments to be secure and we need our digital environments to be secure.













