Hafiz Bashir Fadiya

1/5 Kidnapping in Nigeria is no longer “just crime.” It’s a billion-naira industry. Funded by ransom payments. Sustained by arms flows. Growing because it keeps working. This isn’t theory for me.

@YashRMFC Good line up, give us mobility and speed up top, creativity and overload on the right flank.

Thoughts on the lineup?

@AhmadGanga Because our people want to be lied to.

Why do our politicians lie so much?

@acua_juana @jacksonhinklle With it always about stealing something

@Azebash @jacksonhinklle It's been always about oil.

We went from “free Iran” to “kill their whole civilization” really fast…

@MarioNawfal Iran is a sovereign Nation and as such possesses the right to defend itself from anyone and anything.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 TRUMP’S INFRASTRUCTURE WAR AND THE LAW HE’S DARING TO BREAK So here we are, watching a literal countdown to 8pm, with Trump threatening to wipe out Iran’s bridges and energy system if it doesn’t fall into line on schedule. Trump even went as far as to threaten: “A whole civilisation will die tonight.” That’s less a policy statement, more something you’d expect from a Bond villain, except this one comes with carrier strike groups and legal exposure. And that’s really the point. This isn’t just escalation theatre, it’s a direct collision with the rules that are supposed to govern how wars are fought, and whether they can be fought at all. Because the targets being floated aren’t military formations or missile sites. They’re bridges, power plants, transmission networks, the connective tissue of civilian life. The stuff that keeps hospitals running, water clean, food refrigerated, and cities functioning. International humanitarian law is not subtle about this. Civilian infrastructure is protected unless it makes an effective and concrete contribution to military action, and even then, any strike has to pass the tests of distinction and proportionality. In plain English: you don’t get to shut off a country’s electricity because it might inconvenience its government. And that’s where this threat starts to look less like hard-nosed strategy and more like collective punishment. Because when you deliberately target an energy grid, you’re not just hitting wires and transformers, you’re knowingly cascading harm across an entire civilian population. What makes the situation even more precarious is that we’re not talking about a clean slate. There’s already been a steady drift toward infrastructure targeting. Recent strikes in Iran have hit transport links and bridges, including the Karaj B1 bridge, with civilian casualties reported. The line between “military objective” and “everything that keeps a society running” is already being blurred in practice, not just rhetoric. That matters, because the legal justification gets thinner every time that line is crossed. “Dual-use” infrastructure, electricity, roads, ports, has become the favorite loophole of modern warfare. Yes, power grids support military operations. They also support literally everything else. The law doesn’t ignore that, it centers it. If the foreseeable civilian harm is massive and systemic, you don’t get to wave it away as collateral damage. You chose the target knowing exactly what it sustains. Which is why legal experts and international observers are already using the phrase “war crime” without much hesitation. Not as a rhetorical flourish, but as a straightforward reading of the rules. And even that isn’t the whole legal problem. Because before you get to how a war is fought, you have to ask whether it’s lawful to fight it at all. Under the UN Charter, the use of force is tightly constrained, self-defense against an imminent attack or authorization from the Security Council. An ultimatum to “comply by 8pm or we dismantle your infrastructure” sits uncomfortably outside both categories. Put those two layers together and the picture gets stark: a potential violation of the rules governing the use of force, stacked on top of a potential violation of the rules governing conduct in war. It’s not just pushing the boundaries of international law, it’s stress-testing whether those boundaries still exist. And then there’s the strategic irony. Infrastructure warfare doesn’t stay contained. Iran has already signaled it would respond in kind, targeting energy systems across the region. That’s the logic of escalation once these norms erode: if one side can switch off cities, so can the other. At that point, the debate over legality becomes almost secondary to the reality it produces. Power grids become targets everywhere. Civilian systems become leverage everywhere. The distinction between battlefield and society collapses entirely. Which is why this moment matters beyond the immediate crisis. If the U.S openly embraces the idea that civilian infrastructure is fair game, it doesn’t just bend the rules, it rewrites them. And not in a way that can be selectively applied. Because once you normalize turning off someone else’s country, you’ve implicitly signed off on the possibility that someone else will try to turn off yours. When you take into account that Chinese-linked hackers have already breached U.S critical infrastructure, including water treatment systems, as part of a broader strategy to pre-position for a future conflict, that possibility becomes all the more real. So when the clock hits 8pm, the real question isn’t just whether the strikes happen. It’s whether the last thin line between warfighting and societal destruction gets rubbed out completely, and whether anyone can still pretend, after that, that the law of war is anything more than a suggestion.

@aliyu__m I do sell estate land, official from the company I am working for, 14M for 600sqm in Sabon Lugbe. But we do have some 3rd party sales that are lower than that.

@Azebash JV Lease, for office buildings (occasionally) Mortgage (for small groups mostly within the same organisation)

Abuja, the City of Deals😂 Someone will introduce you to someone that will introduce you to someone that will also will introduce you to someone that he only got to know through someone that will give all of you the number of someone very close to someone that’s close to someone close to Seyi Tinubu😂😂 And all of them will be hiding phone numbers but only talk through conference calls because everyone is hoping the deal clicks so they can get out of the %. The meeting point is always River Plate and Gimbiya Garden 😂😂 On top deal that’s even imaginary.

@MadridXtra Madrid 3-0 Bayern

🚨⚪️ 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐋 𝐌𝐀𝐃𝐑𝐈𝐃 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋 𝐗𝐈.

You know why I’ll never accept that vini is the problem? I’ve seen bini x benzema Vini x rodrygo Vini x Joselu Vini x Jude And it all worked .., now tell me any duo mbappe has had in his career -@S_Spizy

@RepMcGovern He might have truly ordered a nuclear strike if there is no deal by that deadline but might TACO as always

The President of the United States is a madman.

@RupertLowe10 It's too far and an assault the right to association

I couldn’t care less what Kanye West says or does. If Brits want to part with their money to watch him shout into a microphone, let them. He’s a nutcase. But it should be up to those people who purchased a ticket if they attend his events. Not Starmer. Banning him is too far.

@BRICSinfo They've vetoed as expected

JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇨🇳 Russia and China veto UN Security Council resolution to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

@MarioNawfal Let's hope so

UNPOPULAR OPINION: TRUMP WILL OFF-RAMP TODAY

@MarioNawfal Iran don't and won't scare easily as they have shown earlier

I VERY HIGHLY doubt Trump will use Nukes As I posted earlier, these 'leaks' and Trum's rhetoric are all part of this strategy to scare Iran into concessions before he off-ramps I think either way he will off-ramp, he will declare victory and begin winding down the war I think (and hope) I'm right

@jacksonhinklle They lie, they steal and they plunder. Are they themselves terrorists?

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸 BREAKING: Iran says US pilot extraction operation was cover to steal uranium.

@GuntherEagleman By being a terrorist too abi?

Trump is removing a terrorist regime and saving the people of Iran.

@MarioNawfal I hope the world has a plan for when Trump nukes Iran

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's final deadline for Iran expires tonight, with all signs pointing to U.S.-Iran peace talks having stalled. The U.S. has struck Iran's Kharg Island. Again. Israel is striking bridges across the country, in line with Trump’s threats. And now Trump is posting: “A Whole Civilization Will Die Tonight.” Today could mark the most serious escalation in this war yet. Source: @KobeissiLetter

@MarioNawfal Darkness looms over the Middle East and Energy Crises looms large over the world. All for what?

🚨 BREAKING: 🇮🇷🇺🇸 A senior Iranian source: “If the U.S. attacks Iran’s power plants, the entire region and Saudi Arabia will fall into complete darkness. If the situation gets out of control, Iran’s allies will also close the Bab el-Mandeb waterway.” Source: Reuters

@MarioNawfal And the losses would be more than bearable

🇶🇦🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷 Qatar’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Majed al-Ansari: "If left unchecked, the escalation will get us into a situation where it cannot be controlled. And we are very close to that point. There are no winners, only expanding losses."

@itsmecalcifers @jacksonhinklle Nothing the US has never done

@Azebash @jacksonhinklle Not even a tiny sanction against USA...

This is going to be backfire in unthinkable ways. Save this tweet & watch.

@Truthlensdaily @jacksonhinklle If they give the US a taste of its own medicine?

@Azebash @jacksonhinklle That will trigger world war

@BillClinton Trump is threatening to wipe out a whole civilisation

Once again, the best college hoops teams prove there's nothing like March Madness to get our jaws dropping, our hearts racing, and our brackets busting. Congratulations to the Bruins and the Wolverines!