Basil Ringrose

15.2K posts

Basil Ringrose banner
Basil Ringrose

Basil Ringrose

@BasilRingrose

Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. ~H.L. Mencken

West University Place, TX Entrou em Temmuz 2016
917 Seguindo288 Seguidores
Basil Ringrose
Basil Ringrose@BasilRingrose·
@RightsRule250 @WallStreetMav It isn’t the constitution. It is the unilateral interpretation of the constitution by the court, not necessarily the Constitution. Equal branches can differ. And when they do they must act in the best interest of the country regardless of the differences
English
0
0
0
11
Voices Matter
Voices Matter@RightsRule250·
@WallStreetMav SCOTUS will and must strike down the EO. Predicting 7-2 or 9-0 striking it down. If one doesn't like the Constitution, seek to amend it. EO's do not amend the Constitution. No Kings in America.
English
2
0
1
45
Wall Street Mav
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav·
What is the solution if the US Supreme Court sides with the left and says children from illegals and tourists are automatic US citizens? Are we doomed to just sit here and watch the slow decline into the USA just becoming another 3rd world shithole? That seems to be the path and it is depressing to think about.
English
767
484
4K
84.6K
Basil Ringrose
Basil Ringrose@BasilRingrose·
We have equal branches of government. The courts (one branch) made the exclusive proclamation that they have the final word. Branches can differ and when it is big enough of an issue the other branches have an obligation to ignore and override. Sorry this doesn’t fit into a neat little agreement box. Judicial branch only has unilateral authority because they said so.
English
1
0
0
15
James Anthony
James Anthony@jamesanthony_us·
The same duty judges have to support the Constitution is required of legislators, most executive officials, and state officials. The stronger duty to protect the Constitution is required of presidents. When justices are wrong, we must elect and appoint others who get it right. See links in reply.
English
3
0
1
213
Basil Ringrose
Basil Ringrose@BasilRingrose·
Not according to the ACLU attorney arguing in this case. Her argument was that there are no other exceptions other than those already addressed by the court. This is a key element of her argument. Her argument is specific that Congress may NOT create new exceptions. This is going to be a significant hurdle to overcome for the court. I’m not saying they won’t rule in the favor or her argument, but that was the argument made.
English
0
0
0
13
Michael Pratt
Michael Pratt@mikepratt·
@AAGDhillon You are an embarrassment. Grow up. You know he trod to influence the SC. You seem to have no problems when he calls the losers. You’re as bad as he is.
English
68
1
104
6.8K
Basil Ringrose retweetou
AAGHarmeetDhillon
AAGHarmeetDhillon@AAGDhillon·
There’s literally a chair set up at SCOTUS for our presidents to sit in for oral argument. Your separation of powers nonsense is more imitation pearl-clutching hauteur.
Kathryn Watson@kathrynw5

If President Trump attends the Supreme Court's oral arguments tomorrow on his birthright citizenship executive order like he says he will, he would be the first sitting president on record to do so. Presidents have avoided attendance in part to honor the separation of powers.

English
1.5K
8.1K
37.3K
2.3M
The Washington Post
The Washington Post@washingtonpost·
Breaking news: Attorneys for Rep. Eric Swalwell demanded in a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel that the bureau refrain from releasing decade-old investigative files involving the congressman’s purported ties to a suspected Chinese intelligence operative. wapo.st/47vVWAa
English
2.4K
1.1K
4.5K
1.3M
Basil Ringrose
Basil Ringrose@BasilRingrose·
@Ingbenn1 @snarky69 @RT_com you assume I'm mad at someone. there you go again. I just know the motivation and it is childish, weak and transparent. I owe you no explanation otherwise. what do you think this is some kind of therapy session?
English
0
0
0
11
RT
RT@RT_com·
Male ‘G-spot’ discovered — bringing bad news for the circumcised Researchers say key male sensitivity lies in the frenulum, not the glans This ‘frenular delta’ is packed with nerve endings, but can be damaged by circumcision, potentially reducing pleasure
RT tweet media
English
507
492
5.1K
2.2M
LargeMargeSentMe
LargeMargeSentMe@LargeMrgSentMe·
@BasilRingrose @JaredRyanSears @RepLuna Trump literally said a few weeks ago that MAGA is whatever he says it is. Given that Trump is pretty much incoherent on tariffs, gotten us into another war quagmire, and is probably going to deport less people than Biden/Obama did. MAGA is apparently meaningless lol.
English
1
0
1
25
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
At this rate, it’s not even about being a Democrat or Republican anymore. It’s literally the American people versus a uniparty establishment that is corrupt to the core. It’s time for voters to wake up when they go to vote on Election Day. Stop sending the same garbage to the Senate.
English
4.4K
15.1K
61.3K
857.8K
Basil Ringrose
Basil Ringrose@BasilRingrose·
you don't and I'm sure you think men can be woman and woman can be men. they can't. No, women do not have a foreskin in the same way that biological males do.The foreskin (also called the prepuce) is the double-layered fold of skin and mucous membrane that covers and protects the glans (head) of the penis in males. It is a specific structure of the male external genitalia.What women have instead: the clitoral hoodWomen (biological females) have a clitoral hood (also known as the clitoral prepuce or preputium clitoridis). This is a fold of skin that covers and protects the glans clitoris — the highly sensitive external tip of the clitoris. foreskin is specific to men. the one's with the penis. I'm done with your stupidity
English
1
0
0
9
Ingbenn
Ingbenn@Ingbenn1·
@BasilRingrose @RT_com Your wife has a clitoral hood aka prepuce aka foreskin. Women can still prepuce smegma and have bad genital hygiene, or have long "beef flaps" others joke about or find unsightly All the reasons women use for stating men should be cut also apply to themsleves.
English
1
0
0
27
Jared Ryan Sears
Jared Ryan Sears@JaredRyanSears·
It is amazing that MAGA got control of the entire federal government, ruined the economy, caused us to lose jobs instead of creating them, shot up the national debt, and started a new war in the Gulf, and now the narrative is back to that it is the "uniparty establishment". No. It is that MAGA can't govern, and no one should have ever thought they could when their ideas are as ridiculous as tariffs, drill, drill, drill, and conspiracy theories. That is why Republicans are going to lose bigly in the midterms.
English
50
98
553
9K
Basil Ringrose
Basil Ringrose@BasilRingrose·
@Ingbenn1 @snarky69 @RT_com you don't get to decide what I am Implying. I mean what I said. read the words. they don't need interpretation. they mean what they say
English
0
0
0
3
Ingbenn
Ingbenn@Ingbenn1·
@BasilRingrose @snarky69 @RT_com You literally said she wouldnt hage been with you had you not been cut Therefore implying your worth as a man ultimately cane down to if you had a normal penis or a mutilated one. As for the age bit Yeah it matters As influences and biases are what influence decision making.
English
1
0
0
11
Ingbenn
Ingbenn@Ingbenn1·
@BasilRingrose @snarky69 @RT_com Your original comment was calling the original post retarded and childish, the commeny in question implying circumcision is problematic, and the vast majority of circumcisions are done without consent, do infants and children.
English
1
0
1
21
Ingbenn
Ingbenn@Ingbenn1·
@BasilRingrose @RT_com Does your wife need hers as well? How come only the male is expected to cut his off when the female also has one that can produce smegma?
English
1
0
0
19
Ingbenn
Ingbenn@Ingbenn1·
@BasilRingrose @RT_com Advocating for cutting parts of male babies genitals off for a sexual norm is entirely pervasive. What the post described was a unique and sensitive penile structure that gets heavily damaged or entirely removed durring circumcision. What is this "advanced and complex" logic?
English
1
0
1
38
Basil Ringrose
Basil Ringrose@BasilRingrose·
I sure did and boy am I glad. None of your fucking business at what age, but boy I’m glad I did. My wife didn’t determine my worth by my penis but man am I glad I did it. My penis works just fine and my wife is so hot I’m looking for ways still to calm it down, so yeah I’m glad I did it. Nobody is trying to trigger people with foreskin. Go play victim somewhere else.
English
2
0
0
24
Ingbenn
Ingbenn@Ingbenn1·
@BasilRingrose @snarky69 @RT_com So you choose to get it done for yourself? At what age? And why would you marry a retard who determines her mans worth on whether his penis is damaged or not? Does you being happy with yours mean all other men who arent happy invalid?
English
1
0
2
27