NAP

3.6K posts

NAP banner
NAP

NAP

@CallMeNAP33

Entrou em Eylül 2014
1.2K Seguindo159 Seguidores
Tweet fixado
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
Safe to say I and thousands of others lost their minds after David Bote crushed a walk-off grand slam. Wrigley Field was deafening and absolutely electric! Fly The W! #Cubs #EverybodyIn @Cubs @BleacherNation @LMBFSports
English
6
47
455
0
NAP retweetou
Brad Underwood
Brad Underwood@CoachUnderwood·
Thankful
Brad Underwood tweet mediaBrad Underwood tweet mediaBrad Underwood tweet mediaBrad Underwood tweet media
English
67
207
3.9K
75.3K
Marty Mush
Marty Mush@martymush·
I just can't believe we lost. Like how did that happen
English
83
2
63
25.4K
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@Greenbaymaniac7 @Peter_Bukowski The Packers are a win-now trade and they are still entitled to compensatory picks if they keep them through the playoffs and try to win with them. You aren’t getting a premium at the deadline.
English
2
0
0
25
Peter Bukowski
Peter Bukowski@Peter_Bukowski·
Jayden Reed and pick 52 for the new Broncos pick is a net high 3rd in draft comp by the traditional trade value charts. I’d add a 2027 4th to sweeten the deal with forthcoming comp picks. If JES loved Reed, would that be a fair deal? (Probably a Miami overpay)
English
22
0
131
31.6K
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@Peter_Bukowski @Greenbaymaniac7 They already lost Romeo. I think they need to see how Golden’s production and body hold up with increased usage before touching this group (unless it’s adding competition in later rounds). I would add, not subtract.
English
1
0
0
30
Peter Bukowski
Peter Bukowski@Peter_Bukowski·
@CallMeNAP33 @Greenbaymaniac7 I think the smart thing would be to keep them and trade one at the deadline if they got a wild offer. But if on draft day there’s someone there they love, it’s worth exploring
English
1
0
1
231
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@Greenbaymaniac7 @Peter_Bukowski The usage is because the offense is more predictable if Wicks is on the field. They use Reed in a lot of different formations and window dressing (motion). I also think Wicks has untapped potential, but Reed creates some pre-snap chaos.
English
0
0
0
7
Greenbaymaniac
Greenbaymaniac@Greenbaymaniac7·
@CallMeNAP33 @Peter_Bukowski That's not really an obliteration. He's had way more usage than wicks. Wicks has the ability to take over a game and reed doesn't. When wicks is actually being utilized be produces. I dont think losing reed makes us worse, especially if we trade him for a corner or lineman.
English
1
0
1
14
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@Greenbaymaniac7 @Peter_Bukowski So your vote is to make a team in win-now mode worse and put more pressure on Golden to step up in year two? It's best for the 2026 Packers to have all three of Watson, Reed, and Golden. Wicks can be WR4 if they must keep. Reed's production obliterated Wicks' in fewer games.
NAP tweet media
English
2
0
4
316
Greenbaymaniac
Greenbaymaniac@Greenbaymaniac7·
@CallMeNAP33 @Peter_Bukowski Reed cant separate in man, isn't particularly fast, and doesn't have great hands. He is going to get paid. The packers have a better shot at retaining wicks.
English
1
0
1
292
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@beermeo In your knee?
English
0
0
1
27
Juan Legend
Juan Legend@beermeo·
This makes me feel something
Juan Legend tweet media
English
1
0
0
55
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@Peter_Bukowski Wicks is basically a good separation guy that majorly lacks in production. Reed has been a mostly-good contested catch guy for his size who also accrues YAC. I am not excusing the drop against Chicago, but I think he’s pretty easily your #2 headed into 2026. Keep 11 > 13
English
1
0
1
469
Peter Bukowski
Peter Bukowski@Peter_Bukowski·
@CallMeNAP33 Because they’re not going to sign both (either?) a year from now
English
2
0
0
500
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@Peter_Bukowski Exactly the point. What’s the rush to show Reed the door? Wicks unfortunately did not show enough in 2025 and Golden did not get enough opportunities to deal Jayden. If the Packers want continuity on the offensive line, why don’t they also do the same for their $55M QB’s weapons?
English
1
0
2
558
Jason McIntyre
Jason McIntyre@jasonrmcintyre·
March needs Bennett Stirtz, Just make sure Iowa is in the field somewhere. They need a miracle to beat Ohio state here
English
5
0
16
5.5K
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@JerseyAlGBP Two DL and two CB as the top-4 needs now. Maybe a true edge to replace Kingsley and Rashan.
English
0
0
0
226
Jersey Al - GBP
Jersey Al - GBP@JerseyAlGBP·
With Zaire Franklin replacing Quay, Rhyan back as the center, and Banks restructured, let me hear your top 4 #Packers position needs. Go.
English
73
0
34
24.4K
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@ExtendPatBev @AaronLemingNFL @JJLahey You are coming in with the benefit of hindsight. Tell us what the lottery numbers were if you expected Rasheed to regress, Tom to play sporadically, and Elgton to go down with another serious injury. It was a top-10 preseason unit on paper and it was admittedly underwhelming.
English
0
0
0
19
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@kodymcbanks @AaronLemingNFL 1. I didn’t sign Banks. 2. The front office that did has enough confidence in him that they made his contract even more painful to cut with the latest restructure. I’m not moving any goalposts. One of the most elite FOs at evaluating OL talent is still high on his upside.
NAP@CallMeNAP33

@AaronLemingNFL @JJLahey Did you ever consider they like the player? He finished the year better than it started. They don’t seem ready to give up on him based on how it makes him even harder to cut after 2027 now.

English
0
0
0
52
NAP
NAP@CallMeNAP33·
@AaronLemingNFL @JJLahey Did you ever consider they like the player? He finished the year better than it started. They don’t seem ready to give up on him based on how it makes him even harder to cut after 2027 now.
English
1
0
0
100
Aaron Leming
Aaron Leming@AaronLemingNFL·
@JJLahey Oh, they def did. I've got a few for ya. x.com/CallMeNAP33/st…
NAP@CallMeNAP33

@AaronLemingNFL How about you just worry about not having a left tackle? Banks’ deal is disguised as a one-year deal. You’re smart enough to follow the guaranteed money. Walker-Morgan-Jenkins-Rhyan-Tom is still a top-5 through 10 unit even if Banks misses any time.

English
1
0
0
362