Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity
7.9K posts

Ruthless Chastity
@ChasteMichaelR
it’s a nickname, some of you need Jesus | send me 5k and I’ll cut off all this hair | not busy shucking corn in the Old Testament | ΦΓΛ | #WeberState
Ogden, UT Entrou em Aralık 2017
418 Seguindo174 Seguidores
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou

@wylfcen If we could choose to stay young forever we would, but it doesn’t make it right…
English
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou
Ruthless Chastity retweetou

@Kicksbuttson The most likely answer (imho) is neurological, and it’s that we have huge amounts of neural hardware and software for recognizing faces and so are rendered uneasy when something triggers that hardware and software without falling well into the expected parameters.
English

🧵One discussion of evolutionary psychology I enjoy a lot is the debate over the uncanny valley predator theory...
You may have heard of it before. It's the theory that our ability to spot and be repulsed by things pretending (yet failing) to appear human is an instinct we developed over millions of years. Which then begs the question, what thing in our ancient past was pretending to be like us?
This debate gets a little lost in the supernatural weeds, which is fun. But for that same reason, it also seems really similar to a lot of other debates about the supernatural in science.
Scientists are quick to point out that humans are no the only species with a repulsion to the uncanny valley effect. Dogs and cats are also extremely suspicious and aggressive towards copies of themselves. Ever seen a dog react to a stuffed animal that looks a little too dog-like?
The rebuttal to this is that dogs actually do have closely-related kin in the animal kingdom who they might need to avoid, which explains why they (and so many other animals) have this instinct. But what about humans?
I've heard this theory used to rationalize the belief in anything from vampires to elves, and even ancient alien encounters.
The very obvious answer is that in the past we had to worry about other species of intelligent mostly hairless hominin, meaning Neanderthals and Denisovans. Not to mention other subgroups of homosapiens which would spring-forth over the next few thousand years.
Yes, you're hardwired to spot things (or people) who look similar to you, yet distinctly different, and it's normal to feel an innate repulsion or suspicion of them.
You can say that we practice higher reasoning skills when we overcome this instinct and interact with them on even terms, but when the rest of the world still sees things in a tribal "us versus them" perspective, how intelligent are you for being the only one letting their guard down?
GIF
English

@bryndensraven Can’t be because she’s the queen. Like how you can’t assassinate a guy if they’re nobody. Femicide doesn’t refer to queens being killed by their misogynistic brothers lol
English

you are correct.
"cut her breast, to draw blood to entice Sunfyre"
not arm, not face, not chest, not neck...her breast. the language in the text is deliberate.
grace@nyraspirals
let’s be abundantly clear, rhaenyra’s death was a femicide. i find the sentiment that rhaenyra’s death is “embarrassing” or something comical, as inaccurate. in the little narrative space we are given, it’s portrayed as a tragedy. specifically the words “this veil of tears”-
English































