Daníel🍌

@Sackless_Jack @Asmongold @nyaraVT you guys love making shit up to get mad about, Gender affirmation surgery is one of the most successful surgeries that exist with less than 1% patient regret. It's been studied extensively pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC80… americanjournalofsurgery.com/article/S0002-…

@Asmongold @nyaraVT Imagine waking up one day and asking yourself the question you haven’t asked yourself in 2 decades. “Why do I think I’m transgender?” Only to go down a research rabbit hole and realize that you cut your dick off because you mistakenly thought it was backed by science.

> be Asmongold > be uneducated > wake up to a rotting carcass > spread harmful rhetoric about marginalised group in front of hundreds of thousands of people > cause irreversible harm because people take his BS at face value > get paid millions This is why trans people lose hope.

Sure, but it seems like a huge stretch to claim he's abusing him when there's 1000s of hours of video content and his friends never seen anything. The dog clearly loves him too and there is no body language that suggests otherwise. dog abuse is very visible from body language. It is way more likely that it's simply a coincidence of the dog hurting itself the same he reached for his zyns on the table. there's literally nothing that suggests abuse.

@DanielCSUSM @Disinfo_Tracker @sweettart024 Just because you haven’t witnessed his abuse, doesn’t mean abuse has t been happening. Abusers are often VERY good at hiding their actions. Why do you think the new angle seems to be downplaying the seriousness of shock collars? lol get the fuck outta here

Ethan Klein bought the shock collar Hasan Piker is accused of using and tried it on himself. He immediately discovered the collar isn't designed to be painful and likely isn't what made Hasan's dog yelp. Hila tries to get Ethan to say it was painful, but he admits it wasn't.

This dog was literally raised on stream since it was a puppy and he has had vetenerians and animal sanctuary friends on and there has been no sign of abuse for years and people that have been around them have all come to his defense. Why would he suddenly shock the dog on stream after all these years? It's a theory based on a 10 second clip. Granted, the clip looks bad an he has already admitted that but calling it abuse and him shocking his dog is a huge stretch and frankly bad faith. there is no evidence except "it looks like he did".

@Disinfo_Tracker @sweettart024 Because the abuser got visibly annoyed and lashed out. Hence the verbal abuse hurled her way after the shock “you’re acting mine such a baby!” But yall are all good with him talking to his animals liked his too. We get it. He could kill a baby oj steam and you’d still support him

@MDMA_Enjoyer @RsBeingWeird except if you go to that stream the dog wanders off for a huge portion of the stream and he says nothing. Did you make any effort at all to find out the truth or do you just believe things at face value because you want them to be true?

@RsBeingWeird What part of the problem is the dog is forced to stay on a bed for four hours while he streams not the fact that he shocked it is the problem. If I needed an E collar with Geo fencing, so my dog wouldn’t run out I would use it too

Hassan used a shock collar and cut off the prongs confirmed

Because it's clear for everyone who actually watches his stream that he doesn't use a shock collar and doesn't abuse the dog because SHE WAS LITERALLY RAISED ON CAMERA FOR THE LAST 2 YEARS! Everyone included his vetenerian friend, dog trainers, and people who have been with him on stream have denied any abuse and said the dog is spoiled. Maybe not take everything at face value from 10 second clips and just because you want to believe it?

@JaceThePatriot @esjesjesj Idk why you retards can't just own up to the fact that he used a shock collar and lied about it. It'd have been so easy to say yeah I use one but she's never yelped before while trying to gaslight us on how important it is for her to stay on her bed.

Every dog

@plasmaludwig @GoldenDude8 @Grxit that's not how that works lmao. The burden of proof is from the person who makes the claim. This is basic level critical thinking.

@GoldenDude8 @Grxit do you have proof he didn't buy a new collar ?

Ah yes, the classic “go buy a different collar the next day” trick

@ketaminefeen69 @ExiledSummoner @illiwilliwilli @realNikandros people like you are one of the biggest problems with society, you are both dumb and confident. this is the collar: reddit.com/r/LeftoversH3/… And you won't even admit you're wrong on this, you'll just double down somehow. I already know how you operate.

Just to toss a piece into this Hasan dog discourse: In an August 10 2023 stream, Kaya jumps up at Hasan's mom off screen, and someone in the chat suggests getting a shock collar. Hasan says it's unnecessary, and his chat reacts by calling the person a psycho and many others ask if shock collars are even legal. Would it make any sense for Hasan to use a shock collar on stream when he knows his audience reacts this way? original VOD: youtu.be/K-N4iILZO3E?t=…

@gatorgar I hate Destiny but "strong man good, weak man bad" is some neanderthal levels of argument.

Just going to leave this here.

@RbiTriples @IlhanMN cool, Now do U.S extremist crime database (ccjls.scholasticahq.com/article/26973-…) and this study: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC93… when you're finished, there's around 10 more studies and datacenters that have a similar outcome and I'll have you do those. Have fun!

✅ Debunk summary: It’s highly curated: it relies on ADL’s selective definitions, only counts fatalities, excludes large categories of left-wing violence, and uses a timeframe that emphasizes right-wing attacks. Here are the specifics: 1. Data source and definitions are selective The ADL (Anti-Defamation League) is not a neutral government body; it’s an advocacy group with its own lens. Their “extremist” classifications often exclude gang violence, cartel killings, and general political violence unless it fits their criteria. “Right-wing extremist” is defined broadly — it includes white supremacists, militia members, sovereign citizens, and sometimes even apolitical violent offenders with fringe online ties. By contrast, left-wing violence is defined narrowly (eco-terrorists, anarchists), excluding much of the property destruction and assaults linked to antifa/BLM protests. So left-wing violence gets under-counted. 2. Apples-to-oranges metrics The graph compares market cap–style “stock” (extremist label) with GDP-style “flow” (incidents): they treat one-off murders by people with loose associations as “extremist” deaths, but not everyday killings from organized groups like gangs. For example, a right-wing loner who commits a murder after ranting online might be counted, but hundreds of killings in politically charged riots (e.g. 2020 unrest) may not be. 3. Law enforcement data looks different FBI / DHS threat assessments consistently rank domestic violent extremists as a concern but do not show anywhere near this imbalance. In fact, DHS has highlighted anarchist/left-wing groups (including antifa-linked collectives) as a “persistent threat” in Portland, Seattle, etc. The Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS) database finds that left-wing violence surged in 2020–21 — much higher than this ADL chart suggests. 4. Deaths vs. violence The chart only counts fatalities but non-fatal violence, arson, and assaults — much of which came from left-wing/anarchist activity — isn’t captured. 5. Timeframe manipulation The chosen window (2013–2022) captures ISIS-inspired attacks in 2015–2016 and high-profile right-wing shootings after 2017, but cuts off before 2023–2025 data, where there have been more high-profile left-wing/antifa-linked incidents, pro-Palestine clashes, etc. This selective framing can exaggerate one side’s threat while minimizing the other.

Data isn’t vibes. If you need vibes, check out the hate filled comments the rightwing will leave on this post and all my posts.

"your statistics are propaganda" *shares a faked pie-chart and a racist propaganda poster* There's literally tons of sources that debunks your racist bullshit. Here: researchgate.net/figure/Descrip… sciencedirect.com/science/articl… rockinst.org/gun-violence/m… Your fake pie chart even says wikipedia is the source while if you go on wikipedia it literally says it's 50% white... Also, you can not just assume that all black people are "far-left" because it fits your narrative 🤦‍♂️

Oops time to punish grok for doing wrongspeak

There are violent extremists on the left but they are not in charge of the party. You can find them on social media, not in the halls of power. The violent extremists on the right are in congress, on courts, and sitting in the Oval Office. Every single major Democratic politician condemned the murder of Charlie Kirk. Meanwhile, before EVEN KNOWING WHO THE SHOOTER WAS, the Republican president gave a speech calling for VIOLENCE against Democrats. There are masked thugs running through the streets dragging people out of cars at gunpoint. There was an attempted violent coup at the Capitol building brought on by the President himself. Hell he threatened to INVADE an American city FOUR DAYS AGO. I’m genuinely sad the man died. Not because I agreed with a word he said but because he was a misguided person who was himself caught up in the culture of violence. He deserved to be shouted down for his backward ideas, not murdered. The most sickening part of this whole ordeal is the excitement you see in Republicans, how quickly they moved past any respect for the dead, any reflection on the environment they helped foster, straight into who should be murdered next. THEY DON’T EVEN KNOW WHO THE SHOOTER IS, yet they are ignoring the obvious marks of a professional killer who clearly had a highly trained military background, and the fact that these guys tend to be right wing nut jobs with an obscure axe to grind. But they’ve already given him (and we all know it’s a him not a her) an identity: the faceless embodiment of everything they hate and fear with a clearly coordinated messaging campaign to call him a “leftist.” So it’s clear what they want and it’s not peace. They want a justification for more violence. They want a bloody shirt they can point to and say, “See? THIS is why there are thugs in the streets in masks pulling people from cars at gunpoint. THIS is why we must end the American experiment in democracy.” And the most pathetic part of all is that none of it is necessary. Violent crime is down. Everywhere. This is all INVENTED. And it was done so to protect the pursuit of power of one man: a dim-witted child rapist who became a violent extremist simply because selling his dark vision of America was the only way his corrupt, soulless ass could stay out of jail.

Okay, now I gotta adress this. Yes, I don't know if you have noticed but the online political sphere on twitch/podcasts is predominantly right wing. They will and do farm/take shit out of context and misconstrue stuff for clicks. It's not that there is "misunderstandings" it's that you are in an echo chamber of right wing reactionaries that clip shit out of context constantly. So much that there are whole threads just having to explain stuff that you have mentioned above in context . Half of what you say is yes out of context because you don't watch this streamer. you watch other people talk about him. Here's a good start for you: reddit.com/r/Hasan_Piker/… Here is also an 8hr video of Hasan just debunking shit that's been taken out of context: youtube.com/watch?v=aOYPKY… I don't expect you to watch all 8 hrs., but there are timestamps there for certain topics for example some of the ones you mention in your comment. also regarding the Houthi pirate situation. This frustrated me a lot because it's not only dumb but also racist: Rashid al haddad WAS A KID FROM YEMEN. NOT A HOUTHI. not every yemeni is a terrorist and it is just racism to assume so. Hasan asked him if he was houthi and he said no. He would have had an entirely different conversation with him if he had said yes. HE HAS MENTIONED THIS MANY TIMES: (timestamp: youtube.com/watch?v=69x6xZ…. Rashid was also interviewed by daily mail where he said he wasn't a houthi. just a kid from yemen. Hasan also supports Kurdish independence and is a big critic of Erdogan's regime. He talks about this a lot as well????? Do you watch him? Now, please stop with the lies and slander. You clearly don't watch this streamer and your entire opinion of him is shit you see from right wing content creator. I don't agree with Hasan on everything and he deserves valid criticism for many things but the lies are frustrating. I am tired of debunking your nonsense all day so this will be my last comment. please look at the clips provided and get some context. Also be a bit more objective in the future.

Right just like how playing the full unadulterated Houthi propaganda music video that calls for the death of all Jews was taken out of context, and how interviewing a Houthi on stream and calling him the “Yemen Luffy” is just a joke, and calling Hezbola’s leader “based” taken out of context. Like how all his statements about how the Turkish genocide of the Kurdish was totally justified are taken out of context. Like how him propagating Chinese CCP talking points that China has not been torturing Muslims in “reeducation camps” are all taken out of context. A lot of “misunderstandings” don’t you think?

Yes, I am sure Hasan cares deeply about political violence. Surely his statement doesn’t have anything to do with the fact that he has been incessantly dog-whistling to his audience to commit acts of political violence for years. Note below him tweeting the homemade gun used to assassinate the prime minister of Japan in an act of political violence, as a quote tweet of an American politician that Hasan dislikes.

The context was that the annexation of crimea is a nothing burger compared to invasion of Ukraine. Similar to how annexation of Austria by the Nazis was a nothingburger compared to their invasion of Poland. He is anti-russian: youtube.com/watch?si=4ofxi… Always has been. Ok, I am done now. :D

@DanielCSUSM @crypto_liberal Here is Hasan explicitly stating how he thinks Russia was justified to annex Crimea. clips.twitch.tv/ElegantTempere… He later goes on to call it “Crimea river”

I can't find the clip but Hasan's stance on the Houthis is that he condemns their methods and actions but he does support the blockade that they are involved in since it directly affects Israel. They are the lesser evil in this case. Reasonable stance that has been taken out of context everywhere.

No I don’t think in black and white. I think Netanyahu is a war criminal, and Israeli leadership is committing genocide. I also acknowledge that the Houthi’s are terrorists, they have been terrorists long before the occupation of Gaza. They have looted, brutalized and otherwise exploited Palestinians for years, if you protest them peacefully you are gunned down in the street. They attack innocent charter-ships simply for profit. They are not “the people’s army”. A one-state solution with the Houthi’s involvement explicitly requires the eradication of all Jews from Israel.

2 things. 1. He was showing his friend how the houthis are a "musical people". You don't know if he knew what the lyrics were about. and even if he did.... 2. Many in the Arab and Muslim world view the plight of Palestinians as a shared injustice. Organizations like the Houthis are formed with the goal of standing against colonialism and occupation from a foreign force. To Houthis, Israel claims legitimacy "in the name of Judaism" so they see Jews everywhere as tied to it. It is Israel that is fueling antisemistism in the middle east by claiming this and then they call out resistance groups for being antisemetic hate groups.... So a chant from a resistance group about fighting against the oppressors? I don't have a problem with it to be honest. Lots of groups we call heroes in history books today did the same. You can call them out for mentioning Jews specifically but that's what their experience has been. They don't have access to the internet as we do and they don't necessarily understand that Zionism ≠ Judaism. Again, you don't even attempt to understand a side before condemning. I don't think I can make you understand so I'll leave this conversation for now. Thanks for the discourse!

The video is Houthi terrorists parading around guns to lyrics about disfiguring the faces of “Jews”. Here is a literal translation of a few lines for you: “We will disfigure their faces [and] let them taste our might and the heat of the piercing swords… Tomorrow we will see Jerusalem cleansed of the filth of the Jews.”

@phil_uplc @crypto_liberal Lots of typos here, sorry. Live* Condemns*

He is against there being an "ethno-state" which is a completely reasonable stance. He is also for a 1 state solution where both sides can leave peacefully with the same rights. Again this is reasonable. Hasan also confines murderous actions from Hamas/Houthis every day, but he says they have the right to resist illegal occupation and to block aid to Israel to hinder the occupation. A reasonable take. Like I said, the situation is a lot more nuanced, but you seem to be able to only think in black and white where one side is wrong and the other is right. Nelson Mandela and the ANC killed a lot of people. Civilians. Do you look back on them as terrorists today? Should they not have fought back? It's not justified but I am saying this is a lot more complex than the way you frame it. There is a bigger picture here to be had and you don't see it.

@phil_uplc @crypto_liberal Video doesn't work but I am familiar with it. I am curious, what makes this video a terrorist propaganda?

@DanielCSUSM @crypto_liberal Here is a clip of him showing his friend a straight up terrorist propaganda video: m.twitch.tv/HasanAbi/clip/…

He is also anti-zionist and against the terroristic acts against against the Palestinian people, so I don't know where you are getting that. You have clearly not watched him and are just parroting what asmongold or whoever tells you to think. Also, "terrorists" as a word is a lot more nuanced than you understand. It is what you call your enemies. The ANC were "terrorists". The IRS in Ireland were "terrorists". The slave revolts during the jim crow era were acts of "terrorism" .The star wars rebels are technically "terrorists" You have drank too much of the western kool-aid that for you, the terrorists are just whoever your government tells you it is and you don't think twice about it

@DanielCSUSM @crypto_liberal I have watched him for years slowly transition from a progressive liberal to a straight up terrorist propagandist.

Maybe we see it differently, I see it as a response to someone who is actively calling for the killing of protestors. Not a great response, to be honest, and he deserves criticism for it but it's a but weird that people tend to focus on his tweet but not the one he was replying too?

He is posting the picture of the gun used to assassinate a politician, in response to his political opposition. The don’t see how it’s possible to not perceive that as an explicit call to his audience for political violence (the implication is obviously “I hope someone makes this gun and kills him”, there is no other reasonable way to interpret this).