Cat Sox

@HerbertJac82535 @conservmillen It would be really tough to call the pope a non-christian, but it would be easy to call the pope a terrible christian, a useless shepherd that allows his master's flock to be ravaged while whoring about with his neighbor's.

Thing is, the big pharma drug adverts aren't mostly for potential patients, or even for doctors. They are payola to the media to prevent them from wanting to run negative stories about their drugs and corruption.

@pastorbobjoyec0 2x, really minor

Be honest 👇

@RadioGenoa I don't think he realized that there was a second bull.

He found out.

Sixth anniversary coming up.

Let me ruin your June for a second. Every year when National Gun Violence Awareness Month rolls around, the same people who have not read a single page of John Lott's 13,312-regression peer-reviewed study start posting pictures of children and demanding you feel responsible for deaths you did not cause and had nothing to do with. So. Let us talk about children. Since they brought it up. In 2006, the CDC recorded 642 accidental firearm deaths in the entire United States. For children under the age of ten — the number was 31. Thirteen under age five. Eighteen between five and nine. Tragic? Absolutely. Every single one. But here is the number that will not appear on a single "Orange Friday" awareness post: 80. Eighty children under the age of five drown in bathtubs every year. Every. Single. Year. ALMOST THREE TIMES as many children drown in bathtubs annually as die from ALL firearm accidents combined — including adults. And forty more drown in five-gallon water buckets. The kind you buy at Home Depot for $4.99. I have given this information at talks and watched jaws drop, because people genuinely believe the number is in the thousands. They have been so thoroughly marinated in "gun violence awareness" content that their perception of actual risk is completely detached from reality. That is not an accident. That is the point of the campaign. Where is Bathtub Awareness Month? Where is the congressional hearing on five-gallon bucket control? Where is the hashtag? Where are the orange ribbons for the children who drowned while their parents were in the next room? There are none. Because the campaign was never about children. It was never about safety. If it were about safety, they would be equally outraged about cars — which killed 1,305 children that same year. Or fire. Or drowning. But they are not. The selective fury lands exclusively on firearms. And if you are a scientist, which I happen to be, you do not get to cherry-pick your data based on which conclusion you prefer. Quinn's Law Number Six: facts are the enemy of liberalism. Now let us talk about what the actual data says about guns and safety, because John Lott ran 13,000-plus statistical regressions across every county in America and the results are not ambiguous. Fifty-six percent of convicted felons surveyed in a ten-state study said they would NOT attack a target they believed was armed. Fifty-six percent. The deterrence is real, it is documented, and it functions whether or not a shot is ever fired. The firearm you carry protects your neighbor whether your neighbor knows it or not. When states passed right-to-carry laws, multiple-victim public shootings — what the media insists on calling "mass shootings" to maximize terror — dropped by 67 percent. Deaths in those events dropped by 75 percent. Injuries by 81 percent. States that adopted these laws virtually ELIMINATED mass public shootings within four to five years. The remaining events? They happened almost exclusively in the specific locations where guns remained banned. The gun-free zones. The places we hang the sign that only the law-abiding ever read. There were between 760,000 and 3.6 million defensive gun uses in the United States last year alone, depending on which of fifteen national polls you consult. A JAMA Network Open study from March 2025 estimated 489,000 DGUs in which a firearm was actually discharged. The Department of Justice's own National Crime Victimization Survey puts the conservative floor at 65,000 defensive uses per year against assaults, robberies, and home invasions. No dead body. No coverage. No awareness month. Here is one more number for you: 74. Seventy-four percent of convicted felons in a National Institute of Justice survey said they actively avoided homes they believed were occupied by armed residents. Criminals respond to incentives. That is not ideology — that is basic deterrence theory, and it is confirmed by the people who actually commit the crimes. I also want you to think carefully about something the Supreme Court already settled. DeShaney v. Winnebago County (1989). Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005). Two separate rulings establishing that the government has NO legal obligation to protect you as an individual. None. You are your own first responder. That is not my opinion — that is settled constitutional law from the highest court in this country. So the political class that just told you the government is not required to protect you... is also the one demanding you surrender the tool you use to protect yourself. I want fewer people dead. That is why I know the data. That is why I read the book. That is why I am furious every June when emotion and fundraising replace science and evidence in a "debate" that has actual life-or-death consequences for real people. You want to honor the children? Honor ALL of them. The ones who drowned. The ones who died in car crashes. And the ones who will never be born because a woman alone in her house at 2 a.m. had no way to stop what was coming through her door. But what do I know — I am only a published textbook author, a science teacher, a father of four, and a combat medic who spent his career reducing human suffering and who actually read the peer-reviewed data before forming an opinion. IF you agree: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this. COMMENT below — did you know the bathtub number? Or did the narrative keep that from you? Tell me. And if you want MORE of this -- the data, the history, the science, the stories -- JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. #MAGA #Veterans #Trump @JoJoFromJerz @GuntherEagleman @catturd2

What we should do after Henry: 1. Deliver the full, transparent investigation his father asked for. 2. Deport Vikrum Digwa’s mother + any other relative who obstructed justice. Foreign nationals who commit crimes must be deported. 3. Push for a review of Digwa’s sentence - it is too short. 4. End the religious exemption to carry deadly weapons - it is absurd that Sikhs can carry the Kirpan but women cannot carry pepper spray. 5. Root out politically biased, two-tier ‘anti-racism’ & ‘DEI’ policies in not just the police but our schools, universities, NHS, civil service, and more. This is pro-minority, anti-majority discrimination. 6. Reform if not scrap the Equalities Act and reassert politically neutral public institutions. 7. Scrap the anti-Muslim hostility definition, non-crime hate incidents and unnecessary hate laws that are used to police speech about minorities while permitting discrimination against whites. Two-Tier Britain must end. Equality before the law and our public instititions irrespective of race and ethnicity must be enacted. If we do not do this we will push our country down a dangerous path. Full piece ⬇️⬇️⬇️

It's dismaying how the elites in government treat their citizens as opposed to immigrants

🧵 newenglishreview.org/iranian-endgam…

🧵VDH: "The Iranian regime has never viewed “negotiations” as a path leading to an ultimate “deal.” At best, the regime’s supposedly “elected” government plays good cop, while the bad cop theocratic henchmen periodically violate whatever understandings have been reached."

Red flag… 🚩🚩🚩 39.3% vote in… Karen Bass had 117,579 Spencer Pratt had 86,323 42.4% vote in… Karen Bass 130,429 Spencer Pratt 86,323 Virtually every candidate received votes except for Spencer Pratt. Impossible.

Why are political leaders talking as if this is an isolated incident that is being "exploited" by the "far-right" and "pointless rioting" instead of the final fucking straw of anti-white ideology causing the dehumanisation and death of British people? > The security guard at the Manchester Arena didn't stop the suicide bomber because he was afraid of being called racist. The bomber killed 22 people and injured over 1,000. > Valdo Calocane was released because authorities feared they would be called "racist" due to the overrepresentation of young black men in mental health detention. He went on to kill 3 people. > A head teacher who raised concerns about Axel Rudakubana's "very high risk" to others was accused of "racial stereotyping" by authorities. Rudakubana went on to kill 3 young girls and wound 10 others. > Pakistani Muslim child rape gangs were allowed to operate across Britain, targeting thousands of white and Sikh girls, partly because authorities were afraid of being called racist if they interfered. Brits have a tremendous capacity to absorb horrors against their own people, but there are only so many times you can order us to "don't look back in anger". By ignoring people's concerns every time they're expressed democratically and peacefully, the establishment has driven people to engage in direct action. It's dangerous and undemocratic of the government to have done this. And doubly dangerous to give people examples such as Ballymena to follow if people want their concerns to be dealt with.

Hard to see any way this is justified.

It may be a foolish conceit, but here's my new profile background, which I feel encapsulates the elite's attitude towards normies: the regular citizens, those who aren't members of preferred groups or ethnicities.

@KonstantinKisin It's a result of the big race lie. For at least 60 years white Britons have been, per capita, more likely to be victims of ethnic violence than perpetrators. But throughout that time we were gaslit that we were uniquely racist and dangerous. It's time the big lie was debunked.

@legendzent @KonstantinKisin Ragebait post.

George Floyd was indeed killed, he would probably be alive if the cashier wasn't a bitch who called the police over a fake $20 bill. I've owned restaurants and received fake bills numerous times and kept a few to train my employees what to watch out for. And I gave the customers back their fake money often without calling the police on them

Britain had a moment of silence for George Floyd. Our politicians kneeled en masse to show their outrage at his killing. "I can't breathe" became a slogan. George Floyd died on the other side of the world. He wasn't British. Henry Nowak *was* British and his treatment by the police was shocking and negligent in the extreme. Yet there is no minute of silence. There is no coordinated public campaign. There is no kneeling at sporting events. And we all know why. During the summer of BLM, some people said "All Lives Matter". This was treated as the highest form of racism and anyone who said this was immediately cancelled. Why? Because the people in charge don't actually think all lives matter in the same way. They have created a racial hierarchy of victimhood where a career criminal who died through mistreatment by police in a foreign country with 0 evidence of racism like George Floyd is automatically sanctified because of the colour of his skin. And Henry Nowak, a British man, one of ours, is automatically dismissed and ignored because of the colour of his. This is the ugly fruit of so-called "anti-racism", an obsession with race that has created a two-tier society which treats people differently because of the colour of their skin. This needs to stop.

When they said saying “All Lives Matter” was racist it was their moment of truth. There is systemic racism in 2026. It’s against White People.

It appears that the more incendiary Abdul El-Sayed’s rhetoric becomes, the more he rises in the polls. It’s hard to say whether that is despite his antisemitic remarks or because of them. via @stauffervaughn legalinsurrection.com/2026/05/mi-sen…

Anti-Racism IS Racism. Racism is treating people unfairly based upon their perceived race.

Did you know that official police policy requires them to be racist against Whites? It is deeply wrong and must change NOW.

:D :D :D