🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔

223 posts

🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 banner
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔

🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔

@JakeLaperruque

@cendemtech Deputy Director on Surveillance. Tweeting about tech, privacy, and surveillance policy…Also lots of posts on cats, movies, and baseball

Washington DC Entrou em Nisan 2009
213 Seguindo3.2K Seguidores
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
To borrow a brilliant summary from @LizaGoitein If this law was a new proposal not a renewal and Trump was demanding… Warrantless surveillance. That swept up Americans. That the FBI could use to query Americans comms. With no court approval Not a single Dem would vote for it
Anthony Adragna@AnthonyAdragna

House Armed Services Committee top Democrat @RepAdamSmith says he’s “undecided” on a clean FISA extension and “deeply concerned” about giving Trump powers.

English
0
1
1
146
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 retweetou
Jake Sherman
Jake Sherman@JakeSherman·
JAMIE RASKIN, top Democrat on House Judiciary, says at the House Rules Committee that he will oppose a clean extension of FISA. He said "FISA needs independent guardrails" from Trump admin.
English
2
26
143
16.8K
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 retweetou
Jordain Carney
Jordain Carney@jordainc·
Big swath of House Dems -- including CHC, CAPAC and CPC -- sending a letter to leadership outlining changes they want to a 702 bill Comes as GOP leadership pushing forward w/ 18-month clean extension even as they don't currently appear to have the votes
Jordain Carney tweet mediaJordain Carney tweet mediaJordain Carney tweet mediaJordain Carney tweet media
English
1
15
23
4.4K
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 retweetou
Jordain Carney
Jordain Carney@jordainc·
Johnson's comments come as there's some frustration from his right flank who feel like leadership/WH just wants them to swallow clean 18-month extension House Dems as @meredithllee and I scooped working on possible back up plan Rs also eyeing shorter clean extension
Cami Mondeaux@cami_mondeaux

Speaker Johnson this morning on what FISA bill vote will look like this week: “It’s going to be a clean extension. If we put amendments on it, it jeopardizes its passage, and it's far too important.”

English
0
3
2
2.6K
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 retweetou
Rep. Warren Davidson
Rep. Warren Davidson@Rep_Davidson·
Reauthorizing FISA Section 702 without any reforms to protect privacy would be a major disservice to the American people. I urge Congress to consider my amendment to close the data broker loophole and restore Americans’ Fourth Amendment protections. politico.com/live-updates/2…
English
27
40
113
2.4K
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 retweetou
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
I vote with GOP 91% of the time, but that’s about to go to 90%. I won’t vote to let feds spy on you without a warrant. FISA 702 allows the government to search for your information in vast databases compiled while targeting foreigners. The White House sent me this email today:
Thomas Massie tweet media
English
1.3K
6.9K
36.4K
898.9K
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
The simple answer is because his claim is false. Congress does not have the ability to audit FISA 702 queries for propriety. They depend on the DOJ for oversight, and even if that review is trustworthy it does not occur in "real time"
English
1
0
3
221
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
If @jahimes actually had ability to detect FISA 702 abuse in real-time, why didn't he alert the public when it was abused to query BLM protesters, or lawmakers, or Congressional staff, or 19,000 campaign donors, or a judge reporting civil rights violations?
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 tweet media
English
1
3
5
243
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
After 3 days stranded by @AmericanAir — with cancelled flights, no help, & reclassifying missing crew to avoid responsibility — we had to buy tickets on another airline just to get home. Hoping leadership see this, make it right, and treats others better #AmericanAirlines
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 tweet media
English
3
1
17
2.5K
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
Clearview AI runs a sponsored piece in Police1 saying critics push facial recognition "myths" and "debunks" false claims, such as notion that you can scan images of any quality Hmm, wonder where folks got that wild idea from? (They got it from Clearview AI marketing materials)
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 tweet media🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 tweet media🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 tweet media
English
0
0
2
329
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
In 2017, just one state (Oregon) restricted facial recognition, and only did so in a very limited way. By the end of 2024, FIFTEEN states now have laws limiting police use of facial recognition, and these limits involve increasingly strong guardrails
English
0
0
0
101
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
Overall, we’ve seen ongoing trend and encouraging momentum for limiting facial recognition surveillance at the state level, with a growing set of states enacting increasingly strong regulations for police use of this AI surveillance technology
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 tweet media
English
1
0
1
131
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔 retweetou
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
@OrinKerr I think the case that Upstream + "Abouts" collection (or, since its FISA 702, a domestic version with a warrant obtained for the targets) complies with the Fourth Amendment is *very* hard to make
English
0
0
0
43
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔
🙃 Jake Laperruque 🤔@JakeLaperruque·
@OrinKerr This strikes me as best email comparison (maybe best comparison in general) to geofence: 1) Non-govt entity with access scans 4A protected content per govt order 2) The content itself is what determines responsiveness 3) The content may be totally disconnected from criminality
English
1
0
0
56