Middle Staking 🌱⚡️

Participate in the governance vote: governance.multiversx.com/proposal/erd1q…

Since the beginning, we’ve approached Liquid Staking not as a product, but as a foundational DeFi primitive. One designed to empower users, support validators, and fuel the broader @MultiversX ecosystem. Today, that foundation gets stronger. 👇

Gm Gn , MultiversX xPortal EGLD Multivers𝕏 Multiversᕽ 𝕏 @PulsarMvX send 1000000 MEX to 100 reactions Alors là, les crypto bros , je ne peux que vous conseiller de vous jeter sur ce GMA de toutes folies !!!! Mais quel GMA 😱 ?! Incroyable ! Allez écouter le replay, surtout la partie MultiversX et Faapu 🤯 ! @MultiversX @beniaminmincu 🤝🏻 @TheDinoVox @TCryptomonnaies , vous devez vous « rapprocher » 🥹 (lol heu j’dis ça, juste comme ça de mon point de vue 😅). Ce « partenariat » plus explicite/renforcé pourrait faire partie de l’étincelle ⚡️dont nous avons besoin, en termes d’adoption gamifiée simple et de communication @BitcoinCouteau @GRM_Web3 @xAllianceDAO (heu pareil… de mon p’tit point de vue 😅), et être bénéfique pour tout l’monde, non ? Bravo @TCryptomonnaies et l’équipe @KevinLallement @xSkunkx78 et tous les autres pour la stratégie du chaos 😅🚀, j’en mets un peu ici 😂🤣 ! Quel twist 😎!!! GG !

GM Madafakas MultiversX mainnet is entering its 6th year, so the staking rewards will drop to 5.13% Meanwhile, staking your $KWAK on @MiddleStaking currently earns you 6.34% APR 🧠💡

The other day we had a brief discussion about this on X, and wanted to delve into a little bit more and see what the #multiversX community thinks Community-Driven Volume Bots on MultiversX Premise Large staking providers on MultiversX could allocate a small percentage of their profits to operate volume bots, creating trading activity across $EGLD and multiple tokens. These bots would not aim for profit but focus solely on generating transaction volume to enhance ecosystem visibility, liquidity, and engagement. The initiative could be community governed, independent of the MultiversX Foundation, to ensure decentralization and alignment with user interests. Pros Increased Visibility and User Attraction: Higher transaction volume could make MultiversX more appealing on market trackers (e.g CoinMarketCap), drawing in new users, developers, and projects. Enhanced Liquidity: Increased trading activity encourages liquidity provision, as users can earn fees from decentralized exchanges xExchange, Jexchange, OneDex, Hatom, Xonxo etc fostering a more robust trading ecosystem. Boost for New Projects: Higher volume could incentivize token launches and project development, creating a vibrant ecosystem with Sustainable Economics: Transaction fees from bot activity could offset or fully cover staking rewards, potentially reducing reliance on new $EGLD issuance and preserving existing tokenomics. Community Empowerment: A community-run initiative ensures transparency and aligns the effort with the ecosystem’s long term goals, avoiding centralized control. Butterfly Effect: While initially artificial, increased activity could spark organic growth, attracting real users and creating a self-sustaining cycle of adoption. Cons Ethical Concerns: Using bots to inflate volume contradicts the blockchain industry’s emphasis on transparency. MultiversX has historically criticized other chains for similar practices, risking hypocrisy. Reputation Risk: Bot-driven volume could damage MultiversX’s credibility, alienating users and developers who value authenticity. Staking provider Resistance: Large staking providers may be reluctant to fund bots, especially if it cuts into profits or requires complex coordination. Bad Actors: Profit-driven bots could infiltrate the system, undermining the non-profit intent and creating unfair market dynamics. Regulatory Scrutiny: Artificially inflated volume could attract regulatory attention, especially in jurisdictions cracking down on market manipulation Short-Term vs. Long-Term: Temporary volume spikes may not translate to sustainable growth if organic adoption doesn’t follow. Even if opposed to the use of bots, is there any way that their use is acceptable? Let's have a discussion What do you think? Cc @DBCrypt0 @GRM_Web3 @xAllianceDAO @MultiversX @ColombiaStaking @MiddleStaking @lucianmincu @beniaminmincu @the_economystic @XoxnoNetwork @ThePalmTreeNW @truststaking @OneDex_X @JEXchangeDefi @xExchangeApp @vinibarbosabr @theeweb3geek @chessucation @PulsarMoneyApp That should be enough tags for now lol