@Armanullah93280 @kshad063 @Delhiite_ Sath laka jai, Jesa kerala ki maximum log jo gulf ma jata ha wife sath laka jata ja
Indonesia
~Yaseen🥷
8.7K posts
Police investigation revealed the mother Gurpreet Kaur was allegedly involved in her own son's murder with her boyfriend Arpit Prashar, as he had reportedly become an obstacle to her illicit relationship, Arrested.
The father, who works as Truck driver in Saudi Arabia, was unaware of the conspiracy unfolding back home.
زماں@Delhiite_
Lover's Sin: Man kidnaps girlfriend's 7-year-old son, buries body in fields. 📍 Meerut, Uttar Pradesh Ankit Parashar allegedly kidnapped Gurvinder Kaur's 7-year-old son, unwilling to accept another man's child while pursuing her. > Child's body recovered from fields, police said. > Kaur's husband works in Saudi Arabia; couple was in marital discord. Parashar arrested.
English
~Yaseen🥷 retweetou
He is brahmin and you will never find any brahmin criticising him be it swati chaturvedi, priyanka chaturvedi, shandalyas... They are enjoying it.
Wasim Akram Tyagi@WasimAkramTyagi
ललित शर्मा नामी यह पिशाच मुस्लिम महिलाओं का गर्भ चीरकर उसमें पल रहे बच्चों को मारने के की धमकी दे रहा है। क्या @NCWIndia ने इस नर पिशाच की यह धमकी सुनी है? क्या उत्तराखंड सरकार के मुखिया @pushkardhami इस पिशाच पर कार्रवाई कराएंगे? क्या @uttarakhandcops इस आतंकी पिशाच पर UAPA लगाएगी? इस पिशाच के सर पर आखिर किसका हाथ है, जो कानून और संविधान से भी ऊपर है? इस पिशाच की बदज़ुबानी, इस पिशाच की धमकियों का सिलसिला थमने का नहीं ले रहा है। इस पिशाच के खिलाफ ना तो @CPDelhi की @DelhiPolice ने कोई एक्शन लिया है। ना ही @dgpup की @Uppolice ने कोई एक्शन लिया है। आए दिन इसके विवादित एवं भड़काऊ बयान आते रहे हैं, लेकिन पुलिस के कानों पर जूँ तक नहीं रेंगती।
English
~Yaseen🥷 retweetou
So a Muslim woman came to the rescue of a Hindu woman who was thrown out. The Muslim woman sheltered the Hindu woman in her house along with her cat. So the people in the society are outraged by the cat called a Muslim kid "Pakistani" and the Muslim family- "Bomb Fatne waale".
Revathi@revathitweets
A Persian Cat & A ‘Pakistani’! Many were asking me about the actual issue behind the viral video where a man called a child - Pakistani, in Hyderabad, Telangana. Sheik Naseema is living in a flat in Janapriya Lakefront apartment for the last one year as a tenant. Both her sons are employed in Delhi. Prachi Lokhandwala, a friend of her children was apparently thrown out of her apartment about ten days ago due to a disagreement with her owner. The girl had no where to go. So Prachi reached out to her friends. And one of them told her that she can live with their mother Naseema. But the problem is Prachi has a Persian cat. Naseema, despite her allergies, agreed to give them both shelter. The cat was being kept in the balcony. Naseema’s neighbours objected to the cat and raised complaint with the society. When the members came knocking at her door, Naseema promised to get the balcony cleaned up and also assured that Prachi is finalising an apartment and will move out soon along with her cat. But the society vice-president clearly drunk on power and fed with WhatsApp, couldn’t just let the issue slide. He started calling Naseema’s family “bomb phatne vaale, Pakistanis”! He also certified that they are not from India and should leave the country. Just then Nadeem Ahmed, the little boy in the video, stood up. “My grandfather is a Subedar in Indian Army. I am a proud Indian”, he retorted with angst. Nadeem Ahmed is also a friend of Naseema’s children. He couldn’t bear the sight of his aunt being so viciously attacked. The video went viral drawing attention to this behavior in Hyderabad. An FIR was filed on the society uncles, including the now famous “go to Pakistan” uncle. Absolute admiration of the little boy Nadeem Ahmed and love to Naseema ji for giving shelter to Prachi without thinking about religion or her allergic reaction to her pet cat. ❤️❤️❤️ May you both stay amazing, always. Thank you @amjedmbt ji for reaching out to the family. I hope the society uncles are shown their place. PS: There is a clear Supreme Court verdict against ban of pets in housing societies. Pets have every right as the human residents in apartments.
English
Eesti
@yetoshi24 @Qalidurut116534 Poets should stick to poetry. Mussolini created a riba superstate and Iqbal likened it to the Islamicate world. With all due respect, what an idiot.
English
~Yaseen🥷 retweetou
~Yaseen🥷 retweetou
If Modi were honest, he would have cited the collaboration of French with Nawab Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan as the deepest bond Indians ever shared with them.
Tipu was a memeber of the Jacobin Club.
Here, the Indian Muslim ambassador is received by King Louis XVI at the Palace of Versailles; 1788.
— dispatched by Sultan Fateh Ali ‘Tipu’.
ANI@ANI
#WATCH | Paris: Addressing the Indian community, PM Modi says, "There is another thing that connects India and France: football. Football fever is at its peak right now. Its passion is visible everywhere in France. But the craze for football is at its peak in India too. The French team, in particular, has a huge fan following in India. France has started this World Cup with a resounding victory. I wish the French team all the best." (Source: ANI/DD)
English
@Yunhichalachal Larki virgin honi chahiye wasa bi Polygamy ko sab sa pehla oppose karna wala mera parents hoga.
Polygamy non existing problem ha
Filipino
Ladki virgin chahiye isko aur khudka ek biwi se bhi kaam nhi chalta. Itni behudgi kahaan se laate hain ye
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
हिन्दी
@SaharRao13 May be onhon na women ka kaetoots dekha hoon University/ Medical college or workplace pa...??? Or ab wo zayda concerned hoon
English
Men have this insane fear of not getting a virgin wife bcz they’re NOT virgins themselves. They’ve spent their youth doing such kartoots or ab drte hen ke kahin apne jesi/apni gf jesi bv na mil jae
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
@sarcastic_hn2 I will prefer what prophet saw had advised us ~ Pure, Virgin, Young, Fertile women
English
The hypocrisy is yours, not society’s. Demanding “virginity and a clear past” is not a right, its you trying to police and control a woman’s past because you cant provide the same financial security. Stop pretending its the same thing. One is Shariah-given, the other is just ego.
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
@cattttmommyy @fuckpatwaris Women ki past hi oski value ko define karat ha. 1 prostitue sa koi honourable man shadi nhi kara ga chhaiye wo prostituture touba kar ka Sufi ba jai
हिन्दी
@fuckpatwaris Even Allah doesn’t allow women to talk about her past, chutiye salay present ki basic demand ko past sy compare kar rahe hain
English
If a guy comes to get your Sister’s Rishta asks if she’s virgin how would you react?
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
Though it's a ragebait but.....
Our deen says man is bound to fulfil the promises he makes at the time of nikah, fixed pocket money, no polygamy etc.
Man can't dig his woman's past (it's for both though).
Hehe go cry hard
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
Yes because it is wrong. There is no concept of virginity or "clear past" in islam. Dumbfucking chutiye
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
English
@Qursowa @mahamriazali @r0ckstarve Nikahnama conditions deal with the future aspects of the marriage. Not the past
And no zina is not up there with murder. The punishment for zina in Islam is flogging with 100 lashes. The punishment for murder is death. I know zina is no small matter but don't make things up
English
A woman asking for financial security is her RIGHT and a man’s RESPONSIBILITY, a man/woman demanding “virginity” for marriage isn’t their right becs u can’t have conditions over someone’s past, put conditions for their future as u both please.
Pathetic take, may Allah guide u.
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
So a woman putting conditions like fixed pocket money, no polygamy in marriage contract is her right. But when a man puts conditions like virginity and clear past, suddenly it becomes wrong. Damn hypocrite society
English
@becausemarianne It is a fact that women are the gatekeepers of reproduction, and we prefer pure, fertile, and virgin women to protect lineage
English
When a man talks like this — he clearly reveals that he sees women only as a means of sexual gratification and reproduction. Not a human being capable of sin just like his fellow men are. Question is who are these women having unclear past with?
Ahmad@whysomeanAhmad
Freely commit zina, get into haram relationships, increase your body count, then repent before marriage. After that, if someone asks for a clean past, just say that revealing past sins is itself a sin. That’s the logic of brainless pseudo feminists
English
Location: Mumbai
At Mannat Showroom, owner Rafat Hussain was allegedly targeted by four Hindutva women because of his Muslim identity. An FIR was later registered against Rafat Hussain.
According to Rafat Hussain, the women first asked to see wedding clothes and then abused him based on his religious identity. When he went to the police station to file a complaint, around 150 people reportedly surrounded the station in support of the women and allegedly tried to attack him. Rafat Hussain also claimed that the incident was pre-planned, and instead of action being taken against the women, an FIR was filed against him.
English
~Yaseen🥷 retweetou
Muslim Not allowed’ read that again. Pure bigotry dressed up as recruitment. If this is genuine, it’s a shameful violation of constitutional values and basic human decency. No company gets to normalize hate under the excuse of ‘company norms.’ Shame.
@letsblinkit clarify
English