Quift

As the US president openly talks about premeditated genocide against Iran's "whole civilization," the US is more openly linking its war on Iran to China. The US will not simply "give up" in Iran because its war on Iran is a war on wider multipolarism and ultimately against the rise of China itself. The US is out of time - each year China becomes stronger and multipolarism becomes stronger. The US is now engaged in a dangerous global murder spree to destabilize and destroy as much of multipolarism as possible. The US would rather destroy the global economy and attempt to emerge strongest on the other end than simply coexist with the rest of the world. The US will do virtually anything - probably up to and including using nuclear weapons against Iran - if not directly - by using its Israeli proxies to do it on their behalf - to permanently destroy the region and further isolate both Russia and China. And again - this isn't "Trump" doing this - the US has planned and prepared for this very war for decades - conducting plans it has put to paper verbatim. To understand and overcome this threat - people must read the policy papers the US is literally reading from as it wages war and proxy war against Russia, Iran, and China at this very moment.

@DemoneVolpe_ @_yururinrin @omarsbigsister What gave you the impression that I'm hateful? The fact that I pointed out that we have reached a point where the systemic abuse of power is now endemic and that this indicates a breakdown of society and dialogue?

@Quift @_yururinrin @omarsbigsister Eh? Since when? REAL Christians have never been a threat. It's the fake Christians who hide behind religion to justify their hate that are a threat. Based on your reply I'm gonna guess you fall under the latter?

These are what get you designated as a domestic terrorist under NPSM 7, by the way.

@_yururinrin @omarsbigsister Oh sorry didn't know you where a girl.

@Quift @omarsbigsister I mean you proved my point by being a hypocritical piece of shit that doesn't care about the people around you, nor your own actions or the repercussions of said actions because of your absolute ineptitude from distinguishing right from wrong and being an overall snobby shit

@_yururinrin @omarsbigsister I'm not. To prove your point i would have to attempt to influence policy by violent means.

@Quift @omarsbigsister so like you're literally proving my point

@_yururinrin @omarsbigsister How about we take a moment to reflect on the fact that it is now normal for a government to name their opposition as terrorists and what that does for democracy?

@Quift @omarsbigsister i mean you are but whatever makes you sleep at night

@conan_esq Esoteric.

@ChipHomme @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ I'm a European non communist, and we where not under existiential threat from nazi Germany. I did not say they where nice. I'm saying communism is worse.

@Quift @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ Tell that to the millions they systematically murdered.

Europe's disease is not a disease of America. It is a disease of World War 2. In 1946, after we rescued them from themselves and each other, Europeans crawled out of the rubble they had made of their continent, looked around at their mess, wept for a bit, and then formed the wrong conclusions. They decided that ethnic nations are bad. That patriotism is bad. That supporting your tribe, in preference to random strangers, is bad. They decided that these things had led to the horrors of global war and genocide in Europe itself, and so all vestiges of loyalty to one's own people must be stamped out. Nations were, forever afterward, to be post-ethnic, post-cultural legal and economic units filled with... well, anyone, really. A bunch of people who didn't, in fact shouldn't, share values, goals, morals, customs, or even a common language. Nations were to be mere fiefs, their boundaries determined by which set of political elites controlled them. America, having not been smashed to rubble in WW2, did not share this view. We saw WW2 as an expensive adventure in bailing out Europe, which we spent our treasure and our blood on (including my own grandfather's life, and his chance to ever see his grandson) precisely because we shared cultural and ethical values with the people we were rescuing. But they hate us for it. They see our patriotism as fascism precisely because they see all patriotism as fascism. Psychologists have long understood that humans respond to favors with gratitude only up until those favors become so great that they have no hope of repaying them. At that point, their gratitude turns to resentment. How dare we believe we did them a favor? How dare I believe that my father gave up his father so Europe could be safe, peaceful, and free? Don't we know that, because ${ELABORATE MENTAL GYMNASTICS}, we didn't do them any favors by fighting that war? Don't we know that, because ${ANY PATRIOTISM = HITLER}, our love of our country and favoring of its interests makes us fascist and problematic? Well, no. I don't know that. I don't think any European nation is our ally any more. Certainly, we have shared interests, but how much does that really matter, when they refuse to act in those shared interests, because they have come to believe that acting in your people's interest is bad? They hate us too much to work with us. They resent every ounce of the burden which they are asked to share. Our support has made Europe into a pack of idle welfare recipients, complete with sense of entitlement and self-destructive behavior. But if we didn't defend them... who would? Their native populations have been purged of all patriotism, and who would blame them if they didn't fight for ruling elites that hate them? Their imported third-world barbarians won't fight for them. The very idea is laughable. What's left? And what will make them wake up and think about these questions? Perhaps they need to dig themselves out of the rubble of another war.

@bronzeagemantis This is the gayest thing I have seen today, and reminds me of Lindsey Grahams blood lust.

“Cannibalism abhorrent only when sourcing in subhuman. But imagine ritual sacrifice and partaking flesh of a young Dolph. Vitality imparted to unholy brotherhood of Werewolves. I too am transported by dream of crazed Maenads reviving Life feasting on suppleness of my sinews”

@ChipHomme @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ Germany was never an existential threat from which Europe needed saving. Communism was.

@Quift @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ Thats a ridiculous as saying Chiang saved communism by not siding the the Japanese. All these alliances of convenience did was postpone the resumption of hostilities once an immediate existential threat had been eliminated.

@ChipHomme @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ So he USA saved communism. QED.

@Quift @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ You are correct the USSR definitely needed the US support but the was a relationship of necessity. The Nazis were the aggressors and had originally allied themselves with the Russians.

@ChipHomme @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ Without the US, the USSR would never have defeated germany and Communist tyranny would not have ended up occupying half of Europe. This was the important contribution the US did. The actual fighting was a side show.

@Quift @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ How exactly did the US promoting democracy in Europe and oppose the USSR save communism. It did the opposite.

@TimePreference_ No, we can just print money and then force other people to buy our debt at gunpoint.

economic growth does not come from consumption or government spending. it comes from savings and capital accumulation. the austrian insight: we must produce before we can consume, and save before we can invest

@ChipHomme @Eb_V4_Pelt @Devon_Eriksen_ Many europeans did not get "democracies", they got Stalin. Hence my original comment, the USA saved communism, not Europe.

@Eb_V4_Pelt @Quift @Devon_Eriksen_ Apparently you're confused. By calling you out there's implicit rejection of your idiocy. If you think Europe would be better off under the boot of Nazi authoritarians than democracies you're the delusional retard. Is your last name "Quisling"?

Jack Matlock, the US ambassador to the Soviet Union, confirmed that NATO promised not to expand to the East. - That deal was broken and the pan-European security architecture began its gradual collapse. 30 years later, Europe is predictably at war.

Kommer vi föräldrar få nån liten notis på Skolplattformen om att det nu går en dömd dubbelmördare i 6B så vi kan packa ner en pepparsprej till dottern, eller ska man bara hålla jätte jätte många tummar att hon inte blir tredje mordoffret? Tror ärligt väljarna vill veta.

@LeoTerrellDOJ Because it did not happen. At least we have no credible sources for it happening.

Why do the influencers always speak out for the people in Gaza but never for the innocent lives in Iran? Asking for a friend.

@jakeshieldsajj It's actually quite easy. You keep on refusing to vote for their politicians, you refuse to engage with their media, their talking heads and their "narratives " (self serving lies). You make association with them toxic, and we only engage with each other on good terms.

What can regular citizens do to help destroy Israel and ZOG? Everyone is waking up but how do we stop them?

@_yururinrin @omarsbigsister These are new, it used to be that us Christians where the domestic terror threat. So you know. Karma?

@omarsbigsister so like 98% of us are domestic terrorists now right?

@ChipHomme @Devon_Eriksen_ Look, wr can't all be a huge industrial power fighting proctedby two oceans against a middle power in Asia. Some of us are very small nations snuck rigth between major players and when shitbhit the fan, we don't have 3 years to gear up, we have to do what is possible then.

@Quift @Devon_Eriksen_ Rationalizing your cowardice

@ChipHomme @Devon_Eriksen_ Well someone had to broker the financial dealings between Allen Dulles and the Nazis.

@Quift @Devon_Eriksen_ In WW2, Sweden was neutral. Please keep quiet.