参 RoastMyStack

🚨$2,000 SOL GIVEAWAY ALERT🚨 4 developers. $500 each. all you have to do is show up honestly. 💬 reply with the most embarrassing tool and your SOL wallet. 🔁 repost · 👤 follow @roastmystack we built a platform for developers who are tired of pretending every technical decision was intentional. 見性。 ⏰ Launch on BASE Friday 5:30 PM EST · winners announced same day.

見性. ROASTMYSTACK is live on @orynth CA: 3d2HETfvhTxbF8LR7ZG4EHjDFAdcwwm5uBM7jbqibory Paste your stack. Earn your score. Leave a roast worth remembering. 🔥 $2,000 giveaway winners dropping soon. →orynth.dev/projects/roast…

More people are choosing BNB Chain every day. BNB Chain has the highest number of active users over ~30 days (~50.8M) vs any other chain. Source: @tokenterminal

Testnet is live!👇 roastmystack.online

we added a field where you can defend every questionable choice in your stack. one sentence. that is all you get. most defenses do not land. not because the choices are wrong. because most people have never had to articulate why they made them. the decision happened, the sprint moved on, and the reasoning was never written down. 見性とは、その理由を声に出すことから始まる.

誰もあなたのスタックに「なぜ」と聞かない. not because it is good. because that is not how this works. you post, they say nice, everyone moves on. 94 developers found out what happens when someone actually asks. the community voted. 🔥 for the solid. 🤔 for the questionable. 💀 for the ones that deserved a conversation they had never been given. 11 did not flinch. 見性とは、お世辞なしに見ることだ.

伝統的な武道において, 師匠は弟子の型を褒めない。 the honest correction is the respect. flattery is the insult. this is understood, and it is not personal. the tech industry forgot this. somewhere along the way, honest feedback became impolite and "nice stack" became the default. 見性. direct seeing. the practice of looking without flattery.

Nobody planned to question the OpenAI integration. It just kept coming up. stack after stack. the community would get through the database choice, the infra decisions, the queuing system, and then pause at the same place every time. 流行に乗るだけでは、見性には耐えられない. Not because AI is wrong. Because they could tell the difference between a real integration and a line item on a roadmap that needed to say something about AI. @RoastMyStack Testnet coming soon, Stay tuned in!

いや、マジでClaude Code × After Effectsやばいな。 x.com/suza_vfx/statu… 最初に動画見た瞬間、「マジで本格的にやっと動画編集にAIきたんだ」ってなったわ。 操作感がマジで異次元👇 ・映像ソフトの中でClaude Codeがタスクをこなす ・エフェクトの指示を自然言語で出せる ・リアルタイムでプレビューしながら修正 つまり「コーディング専用ツール」じゃない。今この瞬間に、クリエイティブ領域に侵食してる。 これまでのAIは「テキスト生成」で止まってた。 Claude Codeは違う。"ツールの中に入り込んで操作する"レベルまで来てる。 しかもさらに狂ってるのが、特殊なセットアップじゃなくてMCP接続だけで再現できること。 映像制作が変わった？違う。 「ツールを使う」という体験の前提が壊れた👀 やはり、これからの時代はMCP！

これは衝撃でした！！！ XがMCPサーバーを公式リリースしたらしい。 Claude Codeからコマンド1行でXに接続できる。 投稿もリサーチも全部ターミナルで完結する時代きた。 Claude CodeとX使ってる人、 マジで見て😇 ってことで早速いきます↓

いやまじClaude Mythosで人間不在の”AIカンパニー”来そう…

The most brutal roast we saw this week: “Your stack reads like a list of things you were told to use. not things you needed. not things you understood. and it shows.”

We can tell what stage your startup is in by how much of your stack is unnecessary. The earlier you are, The more tools you have.

Most stacks aren’t bad. They’re just… unexamined. A tool added here. A service layered there. A decision that made sense once and stayed forever. We don’t roast to mock. We roast to see. 見性 - direct seeing. Paste your stack.

We're adding team roasts Submit your entire company's infrastructure and let the community find the decisions that made sense in 2019 and haven't been revisited since.

If you've been building with a stack you're secretly embarrassed about - now is your chance to find out if it's actually defensible. Spoiler: sometimes it is.

The most submitted stacks this week: Next.js, Supabase, Vercel, OpenAI. The most questioned item: OpenAI. The community is tired of bolted-on GPT wrappers. so are we.

The highest-rated stack this week used boring tech: Postgres, Rails, Fly.io, Cloud flare. The community awarded it 94/100. "no 💀s. rare." The founder screenshot it immediately.

The Stack Credibility Score is not about correctness. It's about whether your choices are explicable. You can use PHP in 2026. Just be ready to explain why.