TPacko
15.8K posts

TPacko retweetou
TPacko retweetou

Please allow someone who actually knows what’s going on to comment. Larry Johnson is full of sh*t.
A) the POTUS doesn’t need to “access” the codes. He carries them in his pocket wherever he goes. He, theoretically, can launch whenever he wants, from wherever. That where the military aide and the “Football” come in.
B) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is NOT in that chain of command. The president, through the military aide, communicates his order through the National Military Command Center, who then communicates with the unified commanders.
C) Whoever this Larry Johnson character is wouldn’t have ANY knowledge of this. In fact, the CIA wouldn’t even know.
D) this is clickbait bullsh*t.
Out.
English
TPacko retweetou

@Howeyeroll1 @JordanWood 😂 Appointed on November 29, 2018, by the Postal Service Board of Governors, she leads the Office of Inspector General (OIG), an independent organization responsible for ensuring efficiency and accountability within the postal service.

Nice try!
English

@Tpacko2 @JordanWood No, but his personal pick does. And just like that it all makes sense
English

Hey guys. I was gerrymandered. Twice. It was done when all states redistrict. I don’t like it.
But when Trump started pushing states to do it mid cycle because he’s afraid he will lose, the only way to fight back is to make it backfire. Then maybe we can fix the system.
Stephen L. Miller@redsteeze
Kinzinger was gerrymandered out of Congress by Illinois Democrats. This is a rare triple cuckolding.
English

@SenJohnKennedy He’ll, make it a national holiday for all I care! Just fix it!!!!!
English

@JasonSzemborski @Bobacheck Ever notice that they never say they’d use the money to LOWER our taxes? When is “enough” enough?
English

At least this one says it out loud right along with poor misunderstood individuals Larson, legalize it so they can tax it and then spend even more.
Francesca Hong For Governor@FrancescaHongWI
It's 4/20. Do you know where your tax revenue is? Wisconsin is one of the last states without a real cannabis program, and we're handing our neighbors millions every year because of it.
English

@FairElectionsVA @HQNewsNow And disenfranchise Virginia voters in the process. That’s the Democrat way!!!!!
English

No, Wisconsinites shouldn’t have to drive to Illinois or Michigan to buy weed.
In 2022 alone, WI lost $36 million in tax revenue and you aren’t stopping people from using cannabis, if that’s your concern.
It’s 2026, lighten up, man.
Brady Penfield🇻🇦@brady_penfield
@JuForthePeople Actually they should.
English

@AdamKinzinger So disenfranchise Virginia voters to play your little political game. Ya, makes a whole lot of sense to me. And please, don’t start with the “we’re saving democracy!”
English

@JuForthePeople Do you happen to get the munchies a lot? Just wondering!
English
TPacko retweetou

There is a way past the absurd and deeply divisive “war” between the President and the Pope, which has been enthusiastically ginned up by the press. And it is indicated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 2309 to be precise. After laying out the various criteria for determining a just war—proportionality, last resort, declaration by a competent authority, reasonable hope of success, etc.—the Catechism points out that “the evaluation of these conditions for moral legitimacy belongs to the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.” The assumption is that the just war principles function, to use the technical term, as heuristic devices, designed to guide the practical decision-making of those civil authorities who have to adjudicate matters of war and peace.
The role of the Church, therefore, is to call for peace and to urge that any conflict be strictly circumscribed by the moral constraints of the just war criteria. But it is not the role of the Church to evaluate whether a particular war is just or unjust. That appraisal belongs to the civil authorities, who, one presumes, have requisite knowledge of conditions on the ground. So, is the war in question truly the last resort? Is there really a balance between the good to be attained and the destruction caused by the war? Are combatants and non-combatants being properly distinguished in the waging of the conflict? Do the belligerents have right intention? Is there a reasonable hope of success? The posing of those questions—indeed the insistence upon their moral relevance—belongs rightly to the Church, but the answering of them belongs to the civil authorities.
The Pope has said, on numerous occasions, that he is not a politician and that his role is not the determination of any nation's foreign policy. But he has just as clearly said that he will continue to speak for peace and for moral constraint. In making both of these claims, he is operating perfectly within the framework of paragraph 2309 of the Catechism. If we understand that the Pope and the President have qualitatively different roles to play in the determination of moral action in regard to war, we can, I hope, extricate ourselves from the completely unhelpful narrative of “Pope vs. President.”
English













