๐๐ฑ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ง๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป
6.9K posts

๐๐ฑ๐ฎ๐บ ๐ง๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป
@TuranAdam
Uyghur/East Turkistan Rights Advocate, President @ETAAOrg, @StateIVLP Alumni, BA @UniofAdelaide, MA/Honours @Flinders, My dad is the victim of #UyghurGenocide

The world's serial rights abusers include: ๐ฎ๐ถ Iraq ๐จ๐บ Cuba ๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar ๐จ๐ณ China ๐ง๐ฎ Burundi The U.N. Human Rights Council's members include: ๐ฎ๐ถ Iraq ๐จ๐บ Cuba ๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar ๐จ๐ณ China ๐ง๐ฎ Burundi (This is not an April Fools joke โ this is reality.)



This is disgraceful. It is accepting Uyghur concentration camps as simply "the world as it is."



Lets talk โProfessor Jiangโ and why is he suddenly everywhere? Who is he? The man behind the โPredictive Historyโ channel is Jiang Xueqin (ๆฑๅญฆๅค). He is not a tenured professor at a major Chinese university, but an educator who has taught at international schools in China and has been involved in curriculum development and writing. The โprofessorโ label used online is, at best, loosely applied. His YouTube channel โPredictive Historyโ has grown rapidly, producing polished English-language geopolitical content for a global audience. Hereโs where it gets interesting. YouTube is officially blocked in mainland China. Yet his content is consistently uploaded, high production quality, and clearly targeted at Western viewers. That does not prove anything on its own, but it does raise a basic structural question about how and from where this operation is run. Now look at the messaging. Across videos, the themes are highly consistent: - U.S. decline is inevitable - Chinaโs system is more stable and long-term oriented - Western alliances are weak or hypocritical - A China-led multipolar world is both natural and preferable These positions closely mirror narratives promoted by the Chinese Communist Party in its external messaging. At the same time, there is little to no direct criticism of Beijing on politically sensitive issues โ something that is notable given how tightly speech is controlled inside China. So you end up with a pattern: A โprofessorโ without a clear traditional academic footprint. Content produced for Western platforms that are blocked in China. Messaging that consistently aligns with state narratives. And growing visibility at a time when information competition is intensifying. None of this proves coordination. But it does raise a legitimate question: Is this simply an independent commentator who happens to align with Beijingโs worldview or part of a broader ecosystem shaping how China is understood abroad? And more importantly, how should audiences evaluate credibility when labels like โprofessorโ are used so loosely in geopolitical discourse? #China #CCP #InformationWarfare #Geopolitics #MediaLiteracy #Influence #YouTube #Narratives








He needs to resign. ottawacitizen.com/news/politics/โฆ






