Based Lae'zel

First order thinker detected:

@greatmanstring @sophiemeaden Dune coons truly are just low iq, high impulse jews

Every conspiracy links back to them.

staring at protein structures at 1:52 AM with 47 tabs open:

@RoyalSerf Hot take: Every zoomer clones their own girlfriend.

@AryanSkywalker1 We can go deeper, literal cuckoldry: There came a person to the Prophet (may peace he upon him) ) from Banu Fazara and said: My wife has given birth to a child who is black...lol sunnah.com/muslim:1500a

@basedlaezel It gets even funnier: x.com/i/status/20676…

... 🟫🤡👎🏻

People might say to this “who did Argentina colonise?” and “you’re just calling Argentina colonisers because they’re white-coded!” This is wrong, actually Argentina has been involved in hundreds of conflicts over its very long history - they are the world’s foremost imperialists

I find it very hilarious there are still Conservatives in 2026 who argue for the sake of creative liberties when *every time* it’s resulted in a garbage fire. If anything, fiction has STRICTER objective rules than the natural course of history because history does not need to entertain suspension of disbelief nor command the loyalty of an audience. Subcreation is a very brittle material when abused. And despite Hollywood’s best attempts, Homer is NOT the one on trial here. Nolan stands in the shadow of the Greek’s work, not the other way around. And every decision from the casting, to the interviews, to the trailers shows that Nolan is spitting in the face of his obvious superior. There’s a hierarchy to art. It’s not yours to do with as you please. You have a responsibility to learn from your teachers. We would laugh at a child drawing scrawls on the chalkboard and saying he is doing Michelangelo.

Old times, they are not forgotten.

Great Feminization, Soviet-style: In 1968, demographer Boris Urlanis published a bombshell article, “Save the Men!,” arguing that men were the second sex with higher mortality rates. Since nearly 80% of Soviet doctors were female, he said, it was up to women to save the men.

I love Warhammer 40k because nothing gets me harder than a good galactic genocide. For the Emperor!!!! 🩸⚔️🙋🏻‍♂️

@Romans8Shaman Cheers!

It's White Boy Wednesday, Kings. I'm drinking alcohol to obtain a small portion of the happiness I'm entitled to but has been denied to me by fate.

Subscribed to the Stellaris DLC thing for a month because I am a slave to the Paradox corporation and they've added so much I have no idea how to even play anymore. Feels like a completely different game than what it was when I last had all the DLC like a year and a half ago

Ah yes. Shitty hip hop in a period action movie. What is this? 2004?

A New-Old South Honor was the primary value south of the Mason-Dixon in the days of our forefathers, especially in the Antebellum South. Bertram Wyatt-Brown in his book 'Southern Honor' detailed exactly this culture - explaining that it takes its origins in pre-Christian European values and customs, but then, laid upon it, is a Protestant Christian frame. But there was notably two natures of the honor culture: gentility and primal honor. Gentility, as defined by Wyatt-Brown, can be summed up as sociability, learning and piety. Sociability is arguably the most important value here; it is all about hospitality (the old 'Southern hospitality' cliché), i.e., being kind and open to others, holding open doors, being a gentlemen to women and not using harsh language in public (and especially around children or women). The tension with this, however, is that there becomes little room for intellectual culture and solitude for study - which was Wyatt-Brown's argument here. The problem of the Old South was thus a false idea, or rather a very accentuated idea, of what it meant to be a man; this can be seen in the next value: learning. Learning in the Old South was almost purely status, not genuine cultivation of intellect. To know a reference to a part of Homer was to show a level of status, not to genuinely engage with the work itself. Schooling and intellectualism just plainly was not taken seriously, or not to the degree it should've been. The school schedule was built around seasons to show true "manliness," like in hunting, instead of the first priority being teaching a new generation of Southerners; I am not saying here, by the way, that hunting, shooting or other such activities aren't actually manly - they are, but if we are going to get anything done in the 21st century, Southerners need to recognize that we need to seize the opportunity to be the intellectuals of heritage America and the new Conservatism of our age. However, in the Old South, there was a seeming patch to this problem, and that was in Aristotle's 'megalopsychia', or greatness of soul. But this was, unfortunately, mostly theoretical, and the idea that self-worth ought to track internal merit as opposed to just public perception wasn't taken to heart by a large majority of the Old South. But here too is where we need to develop ourselves by the failures of our ancestors; we must have two senses of honor: internal and external. To be worthy to yourself, to strengthen your mind and your personal relationship to God, and to also be worthy and respectable on the outside - this is the ideal and what we must strive to become. Piety is one value which came relatively late to the Old South, largely because the Colonial South was based more on Stoic self-regard as opposed to Christian guilt. It is thus that for the South, especially in the 18th century and before, was more based around shame (public-facing); a shift started after the Second Great Awakening, where Southerners started to be more based around guilt (private-facing). The great synthesis of this, and the one who modern Southerners should model ourselves after, is the great and honorable General Robert E. Lee. Lee was a prayer-centered and devout Episcopalian Christian and he was also a Southern gentlemen, who himself was very humble and honorable. Lee carried an ideal of restraint; he gave the same exact treatment to his own nephew, Fitz Lee, when he was court-martialed and also refused to give his son an easy commission. “A true man of honor feels humbled himself when he cannot help humbling others.” - Robert E. Lee Primal honor is worth which is entirely measured outside of yourself; it is proven via courage, braveness and readiness to answer harm with harm (eye for a eye). You are judged by the community, not by yourself - your worth is your reputation. To this type of honor, there exists five aspects: valor, reputation, physicality, masculinity and oaths. Valor is the most primary value of primal honor; it is the principle that courage only counts when it is demonstrated through willingness to hold to 'an eye for an eye' - or the idea that you would physically, through harm, defend or fight for your kinfolk or community. The origins of this is found in Homer and in Beowulf; it can be seen notably with the likes of President Andrew Jackson. Jackson in his 1812 letter about Creek attacks makes retaliation not a strategy of foreign policy, but rather a vengeance against them for the shame of the original attacks, so as to regain honorable standing. The point here is that Southern valor was not consequentialist, it was a matter of the nature of the response given - as to whether it was honorable or not. This was seen in the Civil War where Confederate generals would push beyond the point of tactical logic as retreat of failure would be a failure of ethics and honor. It is thus clear the natural problem, or tension, caused by this, as it were proven during the Civil War, is that this escalates. During the Queen Anne's War a militia from Massachusetts returned from a failed campaign and they got pots dumped on them for returning after loss instead of continuing the fight. But the important thing about valor is that it allows for a mutual sense of guaranteed protection and loyalty; men know that their fellow soldiers will always come to their side, even if it is inconvenient. What this means is that what we need in the modern day is an ability to deescalate; for this, what there needs to be is legitimate and honorable options besides the most courageous option of no-compromise loyalty, i.e., formal apology, settlements, third-party arbitration or legal recourse, all of which being on a ranked scale of appropriate response (depending on the situation). Reputation was your own self-worth; your worth was not defined by your own inner value, not your own personal sense of your value, but rather was entirely defined by the opinion of others on you. I have already talked about this earlier in this post, but I'll repeat the main point: we must be able to hold ourselves to God, to ourselves and to the community. To be respectable, you cannot just merely show respect, but you have to respect yourself and be internally coherent enough to be respectable for another person to judge you. You wear nice clothes out to show respect to your own worth and to show the community that you deserve respect and that you give it back. Physicality was one of the better signs, upon first looks, to tell of an individual's inner merit. If you are unhealthy, if you are unfit, if you are fat, what does that say about your character? It says that you don't respect yourself, you don't respect your community and you aren't able to commit to even keeping your body healthy. A king who is a 6ft tall beast of a man is far more commanding then one who is 5ft tall; looks matters, maybe not as a determinant, but at the very least as a major factor. Here is something where we need to embody this. You are a book and the cover is your body - people see that cover first and will make judgements about the contents. This is also a matter of inner honor; you have to be respectable to yourself, and a lot of that is how you treat your body and health. Masculinity and gender relations were a major, and almost paradoxical, aspect to the Old South. Women were highly revered and similarly feared; a woman's conduct was the one thing which was able to lose a man's standing despite no misconduct of his own. For example, if a married woman cheated on her husband, her husband's honor would be something to lose due to him being cucked. It was thus that there wasn't just great courtesy and protection of women, but also a very high loyalty and vengeance for women if they were wronged. This creates an interesting dynamic, one that ensures patriarchy but also great power in the hands of women - one which I believe can be transported to the modern day with some success, and one which also can help solve the horribly dysfunctional sexual relations of the modern day. Oath-taking was a structural aspect of the Old South, as it served to create strong bonds with those outside of your family; oaths thus simulate the blood-bond one has to their kin. What makes oaths work is there being a consequence to them; if a oath is merely ritual and no substance, then there is no bond there - this is why even though many Confederate veterans swore to the Union, many privately didn't consider it binding, mainly because it wasn't. In our modern day, people are very atomized and communities are dispersed, it is thus that oaths are more important than ever. We need to take oaths to swear loyalty to the Southern cause and to the community who supports it and if someone breaks that loyalty, there should be a consequential social response by the community - it should serve as breaking from your family; you can't just leave your family easily, there is going to be some consequences. All of this matters for knowing and taking into account what we need to take from our ancestors, what we need to leave and what we need to add, for the sake of creating a new Southern honor culture, one which can guide Southerners through the 21st century and regain our identity.

Next video will be a Commietube/Breadtube refutation. Haven't done one in a while so the time has come. Probably will be out tomorrow™.

@VeritasCurat123 @Emp4thchan "Ethne" is flexible and context-dependent, not a blanket term for "all non-white races" In many places, ethne refers to the nations where the lost tribes of Israel were scattered. The "Gentiles" Paul and the apostles went to were largely the dispersed Israelites

@VeritasCurat123 @Emp4thchan Yes, ethne often means Gentiles/nations in the NT, but that doesn't prove your universal multi-racial reading. You're ignoring context, the identity of Israel, and how the Bible uses the term.

Mandatory abortions for every black child.