Cryptogem

@EricXXVII @octra Team is greedy af, won't end well for investors 😆

chat is this real? @octra completed 2 ICO rounds last year on Echo and raised a total of $4M for 5% of $OCT with a little math, that implies an average of $80M FDV (~$0.08 PPT) entry for Echo participants Do you know what this means?! It means you’re able to bag $OCT from the auction right now at around 3x below the ICO valuation from several months ago All things being equal, the upside here is pretty obvious ?? The implied FDV on Uniswap right now is around $28M, and although I expect it to be higher by the end of the auction, there still looks to be room for upside. It’s basically ~3x from here for Echo participants to even break even. Let that sink in. not an alpha caller, but I think my 2 brain cells work well enough to recognize the letter W when i see it. do whatever you want with this info.

@octra @Uniswap MAX extract on this one lads $oct

octra $OCT is live on @Uniswap CCA - bidding is open until april 20, 2026 - 10% of OCT supply is on auction - place bids in ETH, receive wOCT - seamlessly bridge to octra mainnet and back - 1% of supply is added to the liquidity pool see user and dev docs for info, link in bio

@loshmi Well....at least they can launch in ample time. Bea them to market, Euphoria is just too slow 🦥

isn’t this just copy of Euphoria that’s building on MegaETH?

@awasunyin You're creating literal dogshit, at least EF delivered some value to their bagholders....

this manifesto is so unhinged. it's not written by an organization that's finally growing up, quite the opposite, it looks like the org is stuck in their idealistic adolescence while completely ignoring the reality of what's needed to further the industry ethereum really needs to: - stop optimizing for cypherpunks, start building and caring for the remaining 99.9999% of the world population - stop the technical circular jerking on how the next EIP or cryptographic innovation is going to solve every problem that the ethereum design itself created to begin with, start listening to what real-world people, including institutions, are willing to pay for, then rethink the design of the platform - stop fostering a collective that's entirely driven by vibes with zero no shared goals or purpose, which leads to a ton of wasted resources and zero results - stop writing manifestos, start showing real change through actions

@usualmoney Shut the fuck up

A neobank that can't connect to the banking system is a product with a missing piece. We built the piece. Live early this week.

@WatcherGuru It's over before @octra could even walk 😭 shit is DOA mf's

JUST IN: Ethereum unveils new 'Strawmap' roadmap adding private ETH transactions, quantum-proof security, and massive L2 scaling.

@VitalikButerin Can you stop selling for a day?

I agree with this. Though with the proviso that because Ethereum is permissionless, various centralized and closed things will inevitably exist on top of it. Our job should be to make the open-source, permissionless, trustless, secure censorship resistant ecosystem strong, so that it can hold its own and ultimately prove itself superior to both anything closed / permissioned / trusted-party-backdoored on Ethereum, and to such things outside Ethereum in the traditional world.

@0xngmi Bearmarket things

man, in the last month a bunch of data companies that started at around the same time as defillama have been shutting down, feels strange

@USDai_Official @CoinList Lol

The $CHIP ICO is now live on @CoinList. Sale closes Feb 27. If you earned your allocation through Allo Game, now's the time.

@DreamLeaf5 Absolute pussies killing a cub

These stupid fucking rednecks got arrested for this btw

@The_Roshanx @octra "Wait for market recovery" that's going to fail so hard

Be Octra: @octra > Announces ICO Community gets hyped for mainnet ICO delayed 24h Delayed again Then… silence OTC price: $0.10 - $0.03 Panic selling starts. No listing date. No ICO. No clarity. Then team says: “ICO may not be a good idea right now.” Followed by: “New sale or something better soon.” 💀 So what was the plan? Launch hype - delay - kill momentum - confuse everyone? A top-tier looking project is now speedrunning trust loss. Problem: Delays + zero updates + mixed signals = fastest way to destroy community confidence. Question: If market wasn’t safe for ICO… why build all hype around ICO in the first place? Solution (simple): Skip ICO quietly. Wait for market recovery. List strong with clear plan. Not this: Delay - Panic - Random statements - “Soon” Right now Octra is waving every red flag possible. 🚩

@aryancryptoguy The project is a money grab. Postponed ICO with stupid excuse there was some Sonar problem. Bullshit, there were plenty of ico's before them, the real reason was lack of demand. Now they're trying to time the market...but they ain't timing shit. Clown team 🤡

Bro really farmed engagement off me and thought he cooked 💀 (he is so dumb) First of all, I only shared facts. The team has been slow everyone knows it. Every delay comes with a new excuse. You built insane hype → announced ICO → postponed → then acted like it was never happening. If ONE so-called “FUD” post makes the whole @octra squad jump into replies, imagine TGE day pressure. Also… where did the racist comment even come from? > I never called Octra a scam. > I never targeted any team member. > I never made any regional comment. Also asking @0xdasha Where were you when the community was asking questions for weeks? Silent. But the moment I post, suddenly: “yapper” “zero contribution” “lightning strike your village” Apart from the founders… does anyone else actually work on this team? Funny how some of you were invisible when the community was asking real questions… But one tweet from me and suddenly the entire Octra team assembled 💀 All this just for engagement? The whole point was you guys have been so slow nothing else. The whole octra team except the founders is a racist.

@aryancryptoguy Clown team

Be Octra: > Announces ICO > Everyone is hyped testnet tokens going mainnet > ICO postponed 24 hours > Postponed again > No update after that > OTC price drops from $0.10 → $0.03 > Community starts panic selling. > No clear listing date. > No ICO. Team says: “ICO may not be a good idea right now.” Then follows up with: “New sale or something better soon.”💀 At last Octra used to look like a top-tier project… but after delaying the ICO and making one dumb decision after another, it’s basically turning into a dust project. If the market isn’t safe for an ICO → skip it. List directly when market starts to recover and is in a good state. Simple. Delays + zero updates = worst combo for any project And right now, Octra is waving every red flag possible.

@lambda0xE When tge... you pussies

hi everyone, we've decided to open access to the devnet to everyone, it supports the full privacy protocol via HFHE (a non-optimized version of PVAC), the protocol architecture is too complex to fit into a tweet and probably deserves a separate article, a reference client with all the features has been added for testing, use it on devnet only (for now) devnet is an abstraction over the mainnet and is built on top of the mainnet (yes, treechains allow this), you should probably go and claim devnet coins and explore the client FYI: the client is part of the network from now - it generates proof for validating hfhe computation (we could say it's a mini-node within its own circle), more details later today, but for now: github.com/octra-labs/oct… devnet scan: scan.octra.com faucet: faucet-devnet.octra.com (10 OCT every day) * the merger with the mainnet is scheduled for next week, the devnet is limited in computing power to 64 circles ** proof generation is extremely difficult (this will be visible in the client during stealth transfers), an optimized version will be released for the mainnet in a week

@PeterSchiff Just panic sold

If Bitcoin breaks $50K, which looks likely, it seems highly likely it will at least test $20K. That would be an 84% drop from its ATH. I know Bitcoin has done that before, but never with so much hype, leverage, institutional ownership, and market cap at stake. Sell Bitcoin now!

@_tolks Lower

wow! a massive announcement frontran by insiders! absolutely no way, unbelievable!

@hosseeb @octra launch

Every crypto founder thinks they need to time their token launch around bull markets. I always tell them they're wrong, launch timing doesn't matter. They never believe me. Well, I built a tool with Claude Code to analyze every token listing announced on the Binance blog to settle this once and for all. Here's what I found: Headline result: there is no statistically significant difference between tokens launched in bull vs bear markets (Mann-Whitney p = 0.81), meaning differences between bull and bear market tokens are indistinguishable from noise. It doesn't matter when you launch your token. How can I be sure of that? First, you have to be careful how you answer this question: people believe that it's better to launch tokens in bull markets, and there's more funding in bull markets, so there are many more tokens launched in bull markets. Because of this sample bias, you can't naively look at the proportion of top 100 tokens that were launched in bull markets. To correct for this, you need a clean selection criterion to compare the populations. The best dataset I found was looking at the Binance listings blog. Take every announced listing, tag them as during bull markets, bear markets, or neutral markets, and benchmark the relative performance of the bull vs bear populations. Filter out tokens that aren't independently priced (RWAs, stablecoins, LSTs etc.), and this gets you a total of ~200 tokens to benchmark. See the website below to explore the data & methodology in more detail. This finding is robust to almost any way you slice and dice the data. Now, if you're a founder, this analysis might not be the end of the story. Even if launching in a bear market doesn't predict long-term token performance, there are other advantages to launching in a bear market: less competition for talent, service providers are cheaper, exchange listings are less competitive. On the flipside, if you're doing a simultaneous token sale, you're likely to get more demand in a bull market. But on the whole, these things are probably a wash. The main thing is to just get your product out there and build something valuable. The example I always bring up to founders is that Solana launched 4 days after the COVID crash in 2020, when Bitcoin wicked down to $4K. It doesn't matter that much when you launch. Just launch.

@LoidMong 5 wlfi, locked indefinitely

Do you remember when you joined X? I do! #MyXAnniversary

@VitalikButerin Hyper-scaling to zero

Hyper-scaling Ethereum state by creating new forms of state: ethresear.ch/t/hyper-scalin… Summary: * We want 1000x scale on Ethereum L1. We roughly know how to do this for execution and data. But scaling state is fundamentally harder. * The most practical path for Ethereum may actually be to scale existing state only a medium amount, and at the same time introduce newer forms of state that would be extremely cheap but also more restrictive in how you can use them. * In such a design, the present-day state tree would over time become dominated by user accounts, defi hub contracts, code, and other high-value objects, while all kinds of individual per-user state objects (eg. ERC20s balances, NFTs, CDPs) would be handled with cheaper but more restrictive tools. Making the developer abstractions to make this easy to implement for the use cases that make up >90% of state today seems very doable.