Deborah Marson

44.1K posts

Deborah Marson banner
Deborah Marson

Deborah Marson

@debmarson

Loves books, tea, opera, history, clothes, cooking, cats and pottering around.

Entrou em Eylül 2012
946 Seguindo552 Seguidores
Deborah Marson retweetou
Westminster Abbey
We're beginning with this image of the arrest of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane, which is recorded in St Luke's Gospel: '[Judas] approached Jesus to kiss him; but Jesus said to him, 'Judas, is it with a kiss that you are betraying the Son of Man?''
Westminster Abbey tweet media
English
1
2
29
1.1K
Deborah Marson retweetou
Westminster Abbey
As we move towards the last two weeks of Lent, we'll be looking at the events of Passiontide through a series of images from the Litlyngton Missal – a beautifully illuminated 14th-century service book made for the Abbey's High Altar.
Westminster Abbey tweet media
English
5
31
271
4.2K
Deborah Marson retweetou
helen warlow
helen warlow@HWarlow·
Marc Chalmé French painter ( Brittany) Otherworldly art. I’ve chosen to post his figurative pieces When I found the first one I loved the colours The chair, her dress and the lampshade. that’s without mentioning the work on the floor.
helen warlow tweet mediahelen warlow tweet media
English
4
15
166
1.4K
Deborah Marson retweetou
Mike Levin
Mike Levin@MikeLevin·
Six months before bombing Iran and closing the Strait of Hormuz, the Trump administration fired all the State Department oil and gas experts. The people who modeled exactly this scenario. The ones with contacts at Gulf energy ministries. Now nobody knows who to call. You cannot make this up.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ notus.org/trump-white-ho…
English
731
9.7K
20.2K
581K
Deborah Marson
Deborah Marson@debmarson·
Wordle 1,736 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
English
1
0
2
21
Deborah Marson
Deborah Marson@debmarson·
Wordle 1,735 3/6 ⬜🟩🟨🟨⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
English
0
0
0
19
Deborah Marson
Deborah Marson@debmarson·
Wordle 1,734 3/6 🟩🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟨⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
English
0
0
0
17
Deborah Marson retweetou
Daractenus
Daractenus@Daractenus·
For the record, the president of the United States is now simultaneously claiming that he has won the war, is currently winning the war, needs help to win the war, and needs no help to win the war. All to destroy the nuclear program he claims to have already destroyed last year.
English
936
27.7K
133.5K
2.1M
Deborah Marson retweetou
Richard Morris
Richard Morris@ahistoryinart·
'A Relaxing Afternoon.' (1927) It’s worth pointing out that Vilhelm Hammershøi wasn’t alone in producing quiet interior paintings. Sigvard Hansen was part of a group including Peter Ilsted and Carl Holsøe who are sometimes called the Copenhagen Interior School.
Richard Morris tweet media
English
2
36
216
4.7K
Deborah Marson retweetou
Carrie Coon
Carrie Coon@carriecoon·
Anne Applebaum nails it:
Carrie Coon tweet media
English
1.3K
7.8K
29.1K
1.1M
Deborah Marson retweetou
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
It's now unarguable that the war on Iran is one of the most blatant crimes of aggression in history. You now have not 1 but 2 external participants of the US-Iran talks (Oman’s foreign minister and the UK's National Security Advisor) who confirm that the US and Israel attacked despite Iran effectively meeting US conditions for a deal - ensuring it could never build a nuclear weapon, permanently. As per The Guardian article (theguardian.com/world/2026/mar…), Jonathan Powell "believed the path remained open to a negotiated solution to the long-running issue of how Iran could reassure the US that it was not seeking a nuclear weapon," and "UK officials [...] were impressed that Iran was prepared for the deal to be permanent." Concretely, this means the war wasn't a failure of diplomacy but a deliberate destruction of it. And it also means that the US and Israel have irresponsibly plunged the entire world in an unprecedented energy crisis, affecting the livelihoods of billions of people worldwide, when it was completely avoidable. It's beyond me how you can look at this and not conclude that the real threat all along wasn't Iran but the US-Israeli axis - they're the only parties at the table who wanted war and are making every person on the planet pay the price for it. Extraordinarily, even the UK National Security Advisor is now basically saying this.
Arnaud Bertrand tweet media
English
296
6.7K
12.8K
334K
Deborah Marson
Deborah Marson@debmarson·
@amwilson_opera @CatherineJBott Oh dear. I wonder if it is pitched uneasily between “proper” Austen & Bridgerton & hasn’t fully committed to either. But I’ve only seen the first two episodes so far.
English
1
0
0
38
Alexandra Wilson
Alexandra Wilson@amwilson_opera·
@debmarson @CatherineJBott Actually I got on to an episode last night that really irritated me with its anachronisms and general silliness, so I can't promise it doesn't get worse as it goes on...
English
1
0
0
26
Alexandra Wilson
Alexandra Wilson@amwilson_opera·
I wonder how many viewers have spotted an in-joke in The Other Bennet Sister: casting Lucy Briers - the Mary in the 1995 Pride & Prejudice - as Mary's maid and confidante.
English
4
1
53
3.8K
Deborah Marson retweetou
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
You want the NATO allies to join you in a war you started without ever consulting these allies about the war or explaining your war aims. We’re meant just to meekly fall in line. You recently supported a US invasion of a NATO ally (Denmark/Greenland) but now you want these same allies to join your war. Your president disparaged and misrepresented the role of NATO allies in Afghanistan. But now you want them to join with you again in a war of your making. You went to war with Iran without a thought of how to keep the Strait of Hormuz open and without involving your allies in the matter. But now you want the NATO allies to bail you out, even though there’s still no plan for Hormuz. You want the NATO allies to join you in a war in which you still cannot articulate the endgame. Or what victory would look like. You went to war thinking the Iranian regime would quickly topple, that Tehran would not attack the Gulf States or close Hormuz. Why would we align with such Epic Stupidity? You and other know-nothing blowhards started this war all on your own. You can finish it on your own. If you’re able to …
Lindsey Graham@LindseyGrahamSC

Just spoke to @POTUS about our European allies’ unwillingness to provide assets to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning, which benefits Europe far more than America. I have never heard him so angry in my life. I share that anger given what’s at stake. The arrogance of our allies to suggest that Iran with a nuclear weapon is of little concern and that military action to stop the ayatollah from acquiring a nuclear bomb is our problem not theirs is beyond offensive. The European approach to containing the ayatollah’s nuclear ambitions have proven to be a miserable failure. The repercussions of providing little assistance to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning are going to be wide and deep for Europe and America. I consider myself very forward-leaning on supporting alliances, however at a time of real testing like this, it makes me second guess the value of these alliances. I am certain I am not the only senator who feels this way.

English
983
2.6K
15.5K
1.3M
Deborah Marson
Deborah Marson@debmarson·
Wordle 1,733 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ 🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜ 🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
English
0
0
0
14
Deborah Marson retweetou
Circe
Circe@vocalcry·
Everything is perfectly clear. Iran could not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, which they have been months away from developing for well over a decade. Also, Trump is the only president who could have kept us out of war with Iran, as he himself repeatedly told us. So we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, which Tulsi said they didn't have, in 2025. Then we attacked them last month because Israel was going to attack them because they were months away from developing a nuclear weapon since we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, and that would lead Iran to attack American bases. Iran has never posed a threat to the United States, but we had to attack them first, not because of Israel, but because they posed an imminent threat to the United States. Fortunately, we have won the war, which was not a war but a special operation, in Iran now several times in the last two weeks. It is basically over but might not be over for some time because we already won. We also don't need anyone to help open the Strait of Hormuz, which we knew they would close, which is why we didn't prepare, and we now need allies to help open. What are you guys not understanding?
Karoline Leavitt@PressSec

There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."   This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.   As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.   This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum.   Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury.   Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage.   The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons.   The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country.   But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal.   President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests.   All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury. The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments. And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period. America First.

English
312
2.8K
15.8K
924.3K