Michael W. Campbell

The Top 40 Propaganda Tactics with Links to their Posts Here are the top 40 propaganda tactics ranked by popularity in the order they are most commonly used by all levels of government, NGOs (non-government organizations), MSM (mainstream media), individual billionaires, unelected oligarchs, big pharma, big food, large corporations, investment companies, and maybe even people you know. 01. Repetition: Repeat a lie enough, and it feels like truth. Don’t let familiarity fool you! x.com/dmcorp/status/… 02. Fear Mongering: Scare them, then sell them safety. Fear clouds reason, making people cling to the very source that frightened them. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 03. Emotional Manipulation: Make you feel, not think. It bypasses logic to push an agenda through your heart, not your head. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 04. Gaslighting: Distorts reality to make you doubt your memory or perception so you trust their truth, not your own. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 05. Framing: Same facts, different spin. Change the frame, change the meaning. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 06. Agenda Setting: They don’t have to control your thoughts, just your attention. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 07. Social Proof Amplification: Fake crowds and rigged polls make lies feel like truth. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 08. Bandwagon Effect: “Everyone’s doing it” isn’t evidence. It turns belonging into blind belief. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 09. Appeal to Authority: Trust the lab coat, not the logic? It uses titles and symbols to shut down questions, not answer them. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 10. Consensus Manufacturing via Experts: If “everyone agrees,” why can’t we ask who “everyone” really is? x.com/dmcorp/status/… 11. Priming: They plant the seed, so you grow the thought they want. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 12. Name Calling: Discredit with a word. It uses insults instead of discussion. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 13. Slogans: Catchy words, hidden costs. It turns complex issues into emotional soundbites that bypass critical thought. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 14. Glittering Generalities: Shiny words, empty promises. They dazzle but don’t deliver. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 15. False Dichotomy: Two choices, no freedom. It traps you in extremes while erasing the middle ground. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 16. Emotional Contagion: Manipulate the mood, and you control the message. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 17. Distraction: Look here, not there. It hides truth in noise, keeping you entertained while your rights slip away. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 18. Scapegoating: Blame the powerless, hide the truth. It creates a false enemy to distract from real causes. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 19. Whataboutism: Saying “What about them?” avoids responsibility by blaming others. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 20. Loaded Language: When words make you feel instead of think, they become a tool to control. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 21. Testimonials: Famous face? Trusted voice? They sell belief by borrowing credibility. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 22. Divide and Conquer: If people fight each other, they won’t fight those in power. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 23. Manufactured Crisis: Invent a crisis, offer the cure. Inflated emergencies justify control and silence dissent. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 24. Stereotyping: Reduces people to simplistic traits to entrench bias and divide groups. It flattens identity to shape perception. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 25. Information Overload: Drown the facts in noise. When truth gets blurry, control becomes easy. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 26. Ad Hominem: Attack the point, not the person. It kills reason by making it personal. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 27. Card Stacking: Half-truths, whole lies. It cherry-picks to deceive. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 28. Dehumanization: Strip away humanity, and anything goes. It makes violence feel righteous by erasing the victim. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 29. Big Lie Technique: Tell a lie big enough, repeat it often enough, and people will start calling it “truth.” x.com/dmcorp/status/… 30. Information Control: Control the narrative, and you control the public mind. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 31. Virtue Signaling: When morality is just a show, truth is used as a tool. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 32. Appeal to Tradition: Old doesn’t mean true. It swaps nostalgia for reason. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 33. Transfer (Idea Association): Trusted symbols, hidden agendas. It sneaks persuasion past reason. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 34. Guilt by Association: Smear by proximity, not proof. It taints without evidence. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 35. Astroturfing: Fake roots, real agendas. It fakes the crowd to sway the masses. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 36. Cult of Personality: Hero worship, truth silenced. It trades reason for devotion. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 37. Historical Guilt Induction: Make the past look bad, control the present. It uses shame to manipulate. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 38. Discrediting via Mental Health: Calling dissent “crazy” ends debate before it starts. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 39. Controlled Opposition: Puppet rebels, hidden strings, it rigs the fight. x.com/dmcorp/status/… 40. Plain Folks Appeal: Staged relatability, hidden agendas. It fakes familiarity to win trust. x.com/dmcorp/status/… This content is from “The Field Guide to Propaganda: How to Spot the Lies, Expose the Agenda, and Defend Your Mind.” It distills propaganda tactics into actionable insights. Each one is a brief one-minute read with a summary, a real-world example, a crisp takeaway, and a concrete countermeasure, empowering you to spot and resist manipulation. Grab “The Field Guide to Propaganda” PDF from the Internet Archive. Creative Commons licence. Free to download & share, no strings: archive.org/download/propa… #Propaganda #PropagandaTactics #CriticalThinking #MediaLiteracy #Disinformation #Persuasion #Manipulation #MindControl

KLAUS SCHWAB: Prepare for a "CYBER PANDEMIC" that makes COVID look like "small disturbance" by "halting our power supply, transportation, and hospitals." SAM ALTMAN: "Totally possible" there could be "a world-shaking cyber attack this year that would get people's attention." "In the next year we will see significant threats we have to mitigate from cyber." The Great Reset Cabal is forecasting their plans again....

The fact that soaps and sprays and cosmetics labeled “unscented“ have the same endocrine disruptors that scented versions of those products have, is surprising. Until you learned that unscented is a scent! Fragrance free is what you want.

The CIA developed plans in 1952 to control human behavior through chemicals COVERTLY delivered via VACCINES, food, and water under Project Artichoke. In 2021, 70% of humanity received a neurotoxic COVID shot now linked to 146 neurological and psychiatric adverse events.

I've read hundreds of books on psychology, philosophy, history, economics, and power. Here are my top 10. They will rewire how you interpret people, institutions, and events. 🧵

"Stop taking the injections: NO mRNA vaccines, NO COVID vaccines, NO flu vaccines. And childhood vaccines—you should avoid altogether." ~Dr William Makis, MD "We need a complete reset of the entire area of vaccines...Just stop all of the injections."

Larry Fink: “Every currency and financial asset will be digitized into digital wallets. This will roll out globally, fast. It rewires the plumbing of finance.” The infrastructure for The Great Taking is being announced. When all assets sit in custodial digital wallets on centralized ledgers, legal title and control shift to whoever runs the plumbing. That’s not innovation, it’s the end of direct ownership. Digitization = centralization of control. The “plumbing” they’re changing is who gets to turn the valves on your money, stocks, and property claims. Watch the code. Exit the system. Build your safety zone. Freedom first. CAF.

𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐓𝐨 𝐌𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐬: 𝐇𝐚𝐬 𝐂𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐋𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐈𝐭𝐬 𝐖𝐚𝐲? Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer argues that real climate science is grounded in observable evidence written in Earth’s history, not abstract models.

Asking is the most powerful skill you were systematically taught to avoid. From age three, every request you made was filtered through an adult's convenience. "Can I have ice cream?" became a negotiation about timing, behavior, and earning. "Can we go to the park?" required justification. "Can I stay up late?" needed a compelling case. By adolescence, asking felt like begging. By adulthood, you'd internalized that wanting something meant you were probably wrong to want it. The result? You learned to pre-reject yourself. Before asking your boss for a raise, you spend weeks building the case for why you don't deserve it. Before asking someone on a date, you convince yourself they're out of your league. Before asking for help, you exhaust every other option first. Most people approach asking like a courtroom where they're already guilty. The ones who get everything they want flipped the equation. They assume the answer is yes until proven otherwise. They ask with the confidence of someone collecting what's already theirs. They don't build cases. They make requests. The difference is the understanding that the person on the other side of your request isn't your judge. They're a collaborator trying to figure out if what you want aligns with what they can give. When you ask from a place of assumed worthiness rather than anticipated rejection, something shifts in how people hear you. Your request sounds like an invitation to participate in something good rather than a plea to be rescued from something bad. The world is full of people waiting for someone to ask them the right question. Your job isn't to guess what that question is. Your job is to ask what you actually want and let them decide if they want to be part of making it happen. Most of what you want is sitting behind conversations you haven't had yet.

Soon as I heard the voice I knew it was Jim Rohn. Bought every audiobook this guy ever made. Just wish more people would take advantage of his teachings. One of my favorite sayings of his, "If you don't create your own life plan, you'll fall into someone else's plan. And guess what they have planned for you. Not much." So don't "row your boat gently down the stream" or go with the flow, or say "don't work too hard" when saying goodbye. Create your life plan. Decide where you want to go. Make a commitment. Set forth to that destination. And row (work) like heck upstream to get there. Keep in mind, it's not about your resources, it's about your resourcefulness.

Here's why the world feels like its falling apart. In 1895, a French psychologist named Gustave Le Bon mapped out how civilizations are built and how they fall apart. He called it the lifecycle. Here's how it works: Scattered people find a shared ideal. Typically a religion, mission, or vision of order, and it pulls them together into something greater than themselves. That ideal builds institutions, culture, law, economies, and art. The civilization rises, and for a while, it works. Then the ideal fades across generations. The shared purpose that held everything together quietly drains out, and what replaces it is barbaric self-interest. People stop asking what they owe the whole and start asking what they can take from it. Duty gives way to entitlement. The institutions remain standing, but they’re running on fumes — coasting on the reputation of a past they had no part in building. That’s where it gets dangerous. Because from the outside, nothing looks broken. The buildings still stand, the summits are still scheduled, and the flags still fly. But the load-bearing structure underneath (the ideal that bound the whole thing together) has rotted out. Over a century ago, Le Bon watched this pattern devour every civilization he studied. Read it today and it feels like a diary entry.

Bill C-22 (Lawful Access) allows the government to build a system that makes it easier to access your telecom data, your phone, internet, and other digital activity, by requiring networks to be ready for that access. The problem is how that system is being built. It is being shaped by government ministers, behind closed doors, and without full parliamentary scrutiny. Ministers will set the rules for how your data is collected, retained, and accessed — through regulation, not through open debate in Parliament. Bill C-22 is not just about access to your data. It is about control over the system that makes that access possible.

Our "First-in-the-World" Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole for Cancer paper continues to get a lot of traction 😃 But I promise you all, you've seen NOTHING yet! What is coming, will completely upend Oncology! 🤫

Marc Andreessen just incinerated 80 years of skepticism in under three minutes. Andreessen: “The four most dangerous words in investing are ‘this time is different.’” He’s talking about AI. And he’s about to detonate that phrase from the inside. For eight decades, artificial intelligence followed the same brutal script. Hype builds. Money floods in. The technology fails to deliver. The entire field collapses. In 1943, the first neural network paper proved mathematical models of brain cells could perform any logical computation. Revolutionary on paper. Dead on arrival. In 1956, scientists secured a grant to spend ten weeks at Dartmouth believing they could build AGI by the end of summer. They did not. In the 1980s, corporations poured over a billion dollars into “expert systems” designed to replicate human decision-making. By 1987, the entire market cratered. In 2016, machine learning hype surged again. Faded within months. Four waves. Four collapses. Same result every single time. The skeptics aren’t guessing. History is entirely on their side. Every generation of investors who believed “this time is different” got buried. But Andreessen isn’t finished. Andreessen: “I’ll tell you what’s different. Like, now it’s working.” That sentence sounds simple. It is the most consequential sentence in technology right now. AI didn’t make one breakthrough. It made four. Back to back. In the same window. Language models. Reasoning. Coding agents. Self-improvement. Every single one generating revenue in production right now. Not a demo. Not a research paper. Not a promise. Deployed infrastructure producing billions in real output today. Then the Linus Torvalds moment. Andreessen: “If Linus Torvalds is saying that the AI coding is now better than he is… that’s never happened before. And so now we know that it’s going to sweep through coding.” The man who built the operating system running most of the internet just admitted the machine writes better code than he does. That is not a marketing claim. That is surrender. And coding is the hardest test case. If AI can outperform the best human coder alive, everything downstream is already decided. Medicine. Law. Finance. Engineering. All derivatives. But the part that should unsettle you is the fourth breakthrough. Recursive self-improvement. The machine is no longer waiting for human engineers to upgrade it. It is researching, coding, and optimizing itself. The pace of improvement just decoupled from human biology entirely. And the hardware market is confirming something that has never happened in computing. Hardware is supposed to lose value the second it ships. Nvidia’s old chips are gaining value. Used silicon is appreciating like waterfront property. Every GPU on earth is sold out for the next three to four years. That is not a bubble. That is a structural shift in what the world physically needs to function. Andreessen: “I’m jumping out of my shoes. Like this is it. Like this is the culmination of 80 years worth of work and this is the time it’s becoming real.” Eighty years. Researchers spent entire careers chasing this problem and died before seeing it solved. Generations of scientists poured their finite lives into a theory that kept collapsing under its own promise. And now all four pieces arrived at once. The people calling this a bubble are running the same playbook that was correct every other time. But every other time, the technology wasn’t working. This time it is. For eighty years, “this time is different” buried everyone who believed it. This is the first time it buries everyone who doesn’t.

Most people who take vitamin C take 1,000mg in a single pill. Most people who criticize that dose say absorption drops above 200mg so you're wasting your money. Both groups are missing the more interesting part of the data. Levine et al. (1996, PNAS) conducted one of the most rigorous vitamin C pharmacokinetic studies ever done. Seven healthy men were hospitalized for 4 to 6 months on a diet containing less than 5mg of vitamin C per day. They were then repleted at seven sequential doses from 30 to 2,500mg, with steady-state plasma concentrations measured at each level. The absorption curve is sigmoidal. Bioavailability is complete (100%) for a single 200mg dose. At 500mg it drops to roughly 73%. At 1,000mg it drops to roughly 50%. At 1,250mg it is approximately 33%. The intestinal transporter SVCT1 saturates, renal excretion increases, and the fraction you absorb declines with every step above 200mg. Levine et al. (2001, PNAS) confirmed the same pattern in 15 women. This is the part most people stop at. It's also where the analysis gets lazy. The fraction drops, but the total milligrams absorbed still increases. At 200mg you absorb about 200mg. At 500mg you absorb about 365mg. At 1,000mg you absorb about 500mg. You are absorbing more vitamin C at every dose increase. You are just doing it less efficiently per milligram. Less efficient is not the same as useless. This matters because of what happens on the demand side. Immune cells, particularly neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes, actively concentrate vitamin C to levels 50 to 100 times higher than plasma through SVCT2 transporters. In healthy people consuming at least 100mg per day, intracellular concentrations reach roughly 1.5 mM in neutrophils and 3.5 mM in lymphocytes. These cells saturate at about 100mg daily intake under normal conditions. But conditions are not always normal. During infection, inflammation, surgery, or critical illness, plasma vitamin C can drop below 30 micromol/L within days. Activated neutrophils burn through vitamin C during the oxidative burst, taking up oxidized dehydroascorbic acid via glucose transporters and reaching intracellular concentrations as high as 10 mM. The body pool, roughly 1.5 to 2 grams total, can be substantially depleted during severe illness. At that point, the rate of consumption exceeds what a 200mg dose can replace. This is the argument for higher doses during illness. Not that absorption is efficient. It is not. But that the absolute amount reaching your bloodstream is still higher at 500 or 1,000mg than at 200, and during periods of high demand, that additional supply maintains the plasma floor your immune cells draw from. The Cochrane review on vitamin C and the common cold (Hemila & Chalker, 2013) found that regular supplementation (200mg to 2g daily) reduced cold duration by 8% in adults and 14% in children, with larger effects in those under physical stress. The practical insight is not about whether to take more. It is about how to take it. 200mg taken five times per day delivers approximately 1,000mg absorbed, because each individual dose falls within the range of complete bioavailability. 1,000mg taken once per day delivers approximately 500mg absorbed, because the single large dose exceeds SVCT1 saturation. Same total dose. Roughly double the absorption. If you are going to take a gram of vitamin C per day, splitting it into smaller doses across the day is a straightforward way to get more of it into your body. For most healthy people eating a reasonable diet, 200 to 400mg per day is sufficient to saturate plasma and immune cells. Supplementation beyond that has diminishing returns under normal conditions. But during acute illness or high physical stress, the math changes because the demand side changes, and split dosing becomes the most efficient way to meet it. Levine et al., PNAS, 1996 Levine et al., PNAS, 2001 Hemila & Chalker, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013

Elon Musk thinks the entire education system is built on a broken assumption. That every student should learn the same thing. At the same speed. In the same order. At the same time. Musk: “Everyone goes through from like 5th grade to 6th grade to 7th grade like it’s an assembly line. But people are not objects on an assembly line.” The model was designed for a factory economy. Standardized inputs. Predictable outputs. That economy is gone. The assembly line is gone. But the education system still runs on its logic. A student who masters algebra in two weeks sits through eight more weeks because the calendar says so. A student who struggles gets dragged forward because the schedule doesn’t wait. Neither is being served. Both are being processed. Musk: “Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can or are interested in, in each subject.” AI doesn’t teach a classroom. It teaches a student. One at a time. Every time. It skips what a student already knows. It finds where they’re stuck and approaches it from a different angle. It adjusts in real time. Not at the end of a semester when the damage is already done. A student obsessed with basketball learns fractions through shooting percentages. A student who builds in Minecraft learns geometry through architecture. The subject doesn’t change. The entry point does. No teacher with thirty students can do this. Not because they lack skill. Because the math doesn’t work. AI doesn’t have that constraint. Musk: “You do not need to tell your kid to play video games. They will play video games on autopilot all day. So if you can make it interactive and engaging, then you can make education far more compelling.” The brain isn’t broken. The format is. Kids learn complex systems and strategic thinking for hours voluntarily. Then walk into a classroom and can’t focus for twenty minutes. That’s not a discipline problem. That’s a design problem. Musk: “A university education is often unnecessary. You probably learn the vast majority of what you’re going to learn there in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates.” Four years. Six figures of debt. And the real value comes from the people sitting next to you. Not the institution charging you. The degree doesn’t certify knowledge. It certifies endurance. Musk: “If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college.” The system was built to train employees. If you’re not trying to be one, it has nothing left to offer you. Every lecture. Every textbook. Every curriculum. Now available instantly. Personalized to any learner. Adapted to any pace. The question isn’t whether the old model survives. It’s how long we keep forcing students through it while the replacement already exists.

The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex is going to MELT DOWN HARD… Children’s Health Defense just EXPOSED THE SCAM…Ivermectin is CRUSHING cancer like chemotherapy NEVER could. Nearly 200 patients. Multiple cancer types. 84% POSITIVE OUTCOME.

Why some people fly their jets empty.

Albert Bourla, Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Peter Hotez, Peter Marks, Ashish Jha, and Tedros Ghebreyesus ALL declare — with absolute certainty — that another pandemic is imminent. The same architects of the last plandemic are priming the world for the next one — the inevitable consequence of a world that never held them accountable.

Declassified documents reveal the CIA knew in the 1950s that anti-parasitics disrupt cancer growth. They chose to BURY it for over 50 years. This vital line of cancer research was set back more than HALF A CENTURY — and millions of cancer victims have paid the price.

Donald Trump has finally vetoed $1.3 trillion in additional climate costs on motor vehicles and engine emissions. By rescinding the finding the 2009 ruling that CO₂ is 'a pollutant', the EPA has finally pulled the rug out from 15 years of climate-related regulations. Trump has also reversed sweeping taxes and red tape, designed to crush efforts to drill for oil. Trump's loud response was: 'Drill baby drill.' Trump withdrew from the 2015 Paris Accord, which came into effect in 2016. He has also withdrawn from numerous United Nations climate bodies and affiliations, describing the global warming as a hoax, and holding back on UN dues. He says he is putting the national economy ahead of costly and intrusive climate mandates, associated with international frameworks like the UNFCCC (which the US also withdrew from earlier this year. He also made this a battle over national sovereignty. Trump's actions have moved the debate from 'Is CO₂ changing the climate? to 'Does the law actually give a bureaucratic agency the power to manage it? The EPA now says it lacked the statutory authority to regulate GHGs in 2009, because they did not fit the traditional definition of 'air pollution' intended by Congress. The rescission documents suggests the 2009 findings were 'unduly pessimistic' and failed to account for the potential positive impacts of a changing climate—such as increased plant growth and agricultural productivity. This aligns with the expansion of global greening, specifically the NASA-observed increase in the global leaf area, equal to twice the area of continental US.