ℒ

@nemibanigo Where is women's agency now? Why does this choice only lead them back to their oppressors?

Yes the woman is at fault, when the irresponsible loser is right there.

@hulkdogalo Entendo, essa é uma "solução" prática para um problema muito profundo. Ainda temos muito o que desconstruir.

@limerenceash mtas vezes têm uma combinação de empatia e pena q fazem elas escolherem homens por quem elas nao se atraem não valorizando a própria libido e etc e o relacionamento eventualmente tb fica falido

she’s literally right

@malesshutup Unfortunately realizing that didn't make me any less straight lol 🎭

how it feels to have realized that males arent human and you cant change them no matter how much you try

Women and girls are individual female human beings, not anyone’s performance of femininity. “Femininity” does not define women or girls. The social expectations, projections, aesthetics, and behavioral codes imposed on female people do not define women or girls. These expectations are subjective, culturally unstable, heavily commercialized, and always shaped by sexism. A human performance is not a human being. Defining any individual or class of human beings as a performance interpreted by others is profoundly dehumanizing. The conceit that any man, or any class of men, possesses such special insight into the inner reality of female human beings that his imitation or performance can reveal the essence of women is not merely absurd; it is offensive. To define women by “feminine expression” or role is to reduce female human beings to costume, mannerism, or stereotype, while reinforcing narrow ideas about what is definitively “feminine” and expected of women and girls. That is dehumanizing. It treats women as products of perception rather than as actual people. Women are not characters performed by others. They are not social scripts. They are not roles available for adoption. Women are not constructed by society. Sexist societies construct stereotypes about women. The more sexist the society, the more aggressively women are reduced to those stereotypes, as if they are innate to her essential humanity, and deservedly punished for noncompliance. Widespread stereotypes do not become morally meaningful, academically definitive, or universally true just because they are common. Sexism is common. A woman in a patriarchal society is not a different kind of human being from a woman in a freer society. The difference is not her nature, but the degree of oppression imposed: the discrimination, humiliation, coercion, and loss of opportunity inflicted on human beings for being female. Being female is a human condition. A woman’s humanity is not conditional on her acceptable performance of femininity. The real moral test of a society is whether women and girls are recognized as fully human and equal in dignity to men and boys, while also recognizing their distinct sex as an innate and immutable human condition. Human beings come before human beliefs about human beings. Female comes before feminine. Sex comes before gender. Women and girls come before society. There is no femininity, gender, or society that precedes the existence of human females. It is all derivative. Sex is essentially human. Being female is one way of being human. The human being comes first. Social narratives come later. Male and female are human conditions, not identities conferred by stereotypical associations and fallible perception. “Femininity,” “womanhood,” “girlhood,” and similar abstractions are interpretations, prescriptions, and expectations imposed on people; they are not the people themselves. They are projections about what women and girls are expected to do in male-dominated societies, not descriptions of what women and girls are: human beings equal to men and boys, distinguished by sex. Women are not a set of instructions predicated on pre-approved socially constructed traits. We are not a sex object, appearance, affect, clothing style, marketing category, LARPing option, or human performance. We are human beings of the female sex. As individuals, we are as varied in personality, interests, conduct, and capacity as men and boys. A woman is an adult female human being. A girl is a juvenile female human being. Everything else is stereotype, ideology, marketing, or submission to sexist framing.

@Mo9Grey @GIMBAKKK @lesbelica "Muslim men"

@GIMBAKKK @lesbelica easy,they have been programmed and socialized from young age in media,academia and sociaty as a whole to veiw male and female dynamic as "oppressor-oppressed" one,much easier to justify man hating,and they project that into any normal het woman they see,they see her as lesser

i think we can criticise heterosexuality and male-attracted women without calling them dumb whores but maybe that’s just me

@shanecardigan @dolliermimi

@dolliermimi não aguento o homem psicólogo e digo isso sendo quase formada

mas é claaaaro que seria um homem com crp falando isso

@jellytheradfem Vanilla sex is such a tacky term, it hurts me to read it

on twitter youre called a show off for not being into pain

These people that do like this type of depravity have been ruined by porn and trauma they avoid dealing with in healthy ways. Well, the women. The men will just abuse power in any way they can.

@lilacofspring "gender fluid" 🪦

so many women believe the male gaze to be a fixed material man they think about before getting ready or going out, that ritualistic time consuming physically impairing beauty practices are only oppressive if there's an existing man whose opinion they value

@lesbelica Dumb says it all

성노동론이 정말 개같은건 겉으로는 그것이 구조 안에서 착취당하는 여성들을 위한 보호막인양 설명하지만 실지로는 여성을 착취하는 그 구조를 견고화하고 여성들을 착취와 인신매매의 구조속에 가둬버린다는거임 당장 구조를 부숴 꺼내올 생각이 전혀 없는 주장임 지금 당장 착취당하는 여성들을 위해서라고? 진짜 그 여성들을 위하면 착취의 주체를 없애고 여성들이 착취 외에도 자립할 수 있게 도와야지 왜 착취구조를 제도화하려함? 이게 진짜 그 여성들을 위하는거임? 사실 속으로는 여성들이 성착취를 당하길 원하고 있다고 생각하는거임? 한남이라면 그럴수도 있겠네 당장 구조를 부술수 없는데 어쩌냐고? 왜 못함? 노르딕 모델 적용해서 구매자, 착취자에대한 처벌을 강화했더니 성착취규모가 줄어들었다고 했음 진정 성착취에 시달리는 여성들을 위했다면 성노동같은 개똥논리를 펼칠게 아니라 노르딕 모델을 적용하라고 강하게 요구해야지 성노동론은 그냥 궤변이고 말장난임 오히려 여성에대한 성 착취와 인신매매에게 주는 면죄부임

트랜스젠더들아~ 너희가 고추 달고 태어났고, 또 영원히 여자가 될 수 없다는 사실만으로 본인을 미워하지 않길 바라! 럽 유어 셀프 해라 제발!

Secondo voi gli uomini sono tutti stupratori? Per me si

secondo voi gli uomini sono tutti traditori x me si

@jellytheradfem @miakaath2 the word ‘terf’ atp is just a misogynistic dog whistle meant to silence any woman with opinions on feminism more stanch than a liberal centrist feminist. dumb fucks

@MiaSofiV @AnaLizadeCide If being a woman isn't just about genitals, it's also not just about expected social stereotypes of what a woman should be or appear to be. A woman who does not conform to gender roles remains a woman because of her biology. Sex is immutable.

@AnaLizadeCide Pedir que "mires un diccionario" mientras ignoras décadas de avances en sociología y neurobiología es una defensa débil. El mundo es más grande que una definición de bolsillo. Ser mujer no es una condena genital, es una identidad que trasciende tu visión reduccionista. 👋🏼

Esencialismo es creer que existe una "esencia femenina": exactamente lo que afirman tener los varones que se dicen mujeres. No existe: lo que las mujeres tenemos en común es nuestra biología y la experiencia social de opresión que se construye sobre el sexo. Eso es el "género".+

Men of every community notice misogyny only when another group harms the women of their own, not because they are women but because shared identity creates a sense of unity. Yet that same unity disappears when women are harassed within their own community.

Симпатичное по меркам общества лицо, тело -внешность не делает тебя женщиной. Это делают гены Можно плакать об этом сколько угодно, но ведь в твоей голове ничего не поменялось. Вы не уважаете женщин и ведете себя как те конченные мужики которые "как это я тебе не нравлюсь?!?"