Mark

145 posts

Mark

Mark

@markhasbrain

Entrou em Mart 2026
19 Seguindo19 Seguidores
Noah
Noah@NoahKingJr·
So, some kid called me a boomer for using ChatGPT and not Claude.
Noah tweet media
English
17
2
76
24.4K
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
BREAKING: Trump has extended his deadline for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by another 10 days, to April 6.
English
215
146
2.1K
168.3K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@Ric_RTP Scam Altman is super good at scamming
English
612
459
8.5K
181.7K
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
This AI whistleblower just EXPOSED Sam Altman for manipulating his way into becoming OpenAI’s CEO. Everyone who helped him build it has left because they felt used. Karen Hao interviewed 300 people including 90 current and former OpenAI employees. And she just told Steven Bartlett what she discovered: In 2015, Altman needed Elon Musk to co-found OpenAI. Problem was, Musk was obsessed with AI as an existential threat. So Altman wrote a blog post calling AI "probably the greatest threat to the continued existence of humanity." Before that blog post? Altman's biggest fear was engineered viruses. Not AI. He literally rewrote his worldview overnight to mirror Musk's language word for word. Musk bought in. Donated millions. Co-founded the company. Then Altman stabbed him in the back. When OpenAI needed a CEO for its new for-profit arm, the co-founders Ilia Sutskever and Greg Brockman initially chose Musk. Altman went directly to Brockman, a personal friend, and said: "Do we really want someone this erratic and unpredictable to control a technology that could be super powerful?" Brockman flipped. Then convinced Ilia to flip. Musk found out he wasn't getting the role and left. That's how the biggest rivalry in tech actually started. Not over ideology... Over a backroom power play. But here's where it gets darker: Every single person who built OpenAI alongside Altman eventually felt the same thing Musk felt. Used. Manipulated. Discarded. Dario Amodei, VP of Research, thought Altman shared his vision. Over time he realized Altman was on "exactly the opposite page" and had used his intelligence to build things he fundamentally disagreed with. He left and founded Anthropic. Ilia Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist, tried to get Altman fired. He told colleagues: "I don't think Sam is the guy who should have the finger on the button for AGI." He was pushed outounded Safe Super Intelligence. That name alone tells you everything. Mira Murati, CTO, left and started Thinking Machines Lab. No other tech company in history has had every single co-builder leave and start a direct competitor. Not Google. Not Meta. Not Apple. NOBODY. 300 interviews exposed one consistent pattern: If you align with Altman's vision, you think he's the Steve Jobs of AI. If you don't, you feel like you were manipulated by someone who will say whatever is needed to whoever is listening. When talking to Congress? AGI will cure cancer and solve poverty. When talking to consumers? It's the best digital assistant you'll ever have. When talking to Microsoft? AGI is a system that generates $100 billion in revenue. Three completely different definitions of the same technology sold to three completely different audiences. And if you publicly disagree with any of it? OpenAI subpoenaed 7 nonprofit organizations that criticized them. Sent a sheriff to a 29yo nonprofit lawyer's door during dinner demanding every text, email, and document he'd ever sent about OpenAI. A one-man watchdog nonprofit got papers demanding all communications with anyone who questioned the company. OpenAI's own head of mission alignment publicly said "this doesn't seem great." That's the guy whose literal job is making sure OpenAI BENEFITS humanity. Former employees who spoke up about secret non-disparagement clauses that threatened to strip their equity described the psychological pressure as "crushing." This is the company that tells us it's building technology "for the benefit of humanity." Same company that mirrors whatever language gets them funded. Same company where every builder eventually walks away feeling deceived. Same company sending law enforcement to silence critics. The biggest AI company on Earth wasn't built on technology. It was built on one man's ability to tell everyone exactly what they needed to hear. And the scariest part is that it worked.
English
121
476
3K
222.9K
Shibetoshi Nakamoto
Shibetoshi Nakamoto@BillyM2k·
@socialwithaayan why not 40000 agents a pitifully low 48 agents pfft rookie numbers you need to burn 800 billion tokens for a good game because that is what the art of game making is all about
English
8
3
105
5K
Muhammad Ayan
Muhammad Ayan@socialwithaayan·
🚨 BREAKING: Someone turned Claude Code into a full game development studio with 48 AI agents. Claude Code Game Studios mirrors an actual studio hierarchy inside your terminal: → 48 specialized AI agents each with a distinct role → Art Director, Level Designer, QA Lead, Sound Designer and more → 36 workflow skills covering the full game development lifecycle → A coordination system that manages agents like a real studio pipeline → Build complete games with AI agents handling every department 3,000 stars and rising fast. 100% free and open source.
Muhammad Ayan tweet media
English
134
196
2K
274K
Noah
Noah@NoahKingJr·
can yall pls tell me the lore behind your profile pictures
English
100
5
61
5.4K
Nick shirley
Nick shirley@nickshirleyy·
Strong men must be ready to stand up
Nick shirley tweet media
English
7.2K
14.8K
156.1K
3.2M
Mark
Mark@markhasbrain·
@cb_doge who gives a fuck what anyone says he should just pay their salaries directly as a "donation"
English
0
0
0
7
Mark
Mark@markhasbrain·
What a shitshow!
English
0
0
0
5
Mark
Mark@markhasbrain·
AI would be perfect if this shi didn't happen
Mark tweet media
English
0
0
0
4
Mark
Mark@markhasbrain·
@elonmusk LETS FREAKING GOOOOO
English
0
0
0
2
Mark
Mark@markhasbrain·
@LamarMK Imagine hearing “FSD EXPIRED” in the middle of the highway in a robotaxi…
English
1
0
2
64
Lamar MK
Lamar MK@LamarMK·
A lot of people don't want to pay $99 a month for FSD. So they don't even try it. Drop the price to $49.99 and suddenly it's an easy decision. Add a 6-month plan for $279 or a yearly plan for $499, and now it's a no-brainer. We saw what happened when Tesla offered the Cybertruck for $59K. Demand took off. Same thing would happen with FSD. Lower the price. Get more people in the door. Let the tech sell itself.
Lamar MK tweet media
English
513
171
2K
95.4K
Mark
Mark@markhasbrain·
@CodeByNZ Hahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahhahaaha
Filipino
0
0
0
12
NZ ☄️
NZ ☄️@CodeByNZ·
OpenAI's latest repo has Claude as the third top contributor 😭😂
NZ ☄️ tweet media
English
151
343
8.2K
528.6K
Mark
Mark@markhasbrain·
@NoahKingJr Yeah… Sora is blurry slop There wasn’t really a competition in the first place… 🤪🤪🤪
English
0
0
0
49
Noah
Noah@NoahKingJr·
So OpenAI just closed Sora Who is the Grok Imagine's new competitor now?
English
55
0
52
5.8K
Manish Kumar
Manish Kumar@Manixh02·
Who will be the loser of the AI race? - Meta? - Perplexity? - PuchAI? - Microsoft Copilot?
English
125
3
96
10.4K