Nils Samp
31 posts
Nils Samp
@nilssamp
Videograf | Videoproduktion Hamburg
Hamburg Entrou em Ekim 2015
431 Seguindo78 Seguidores
Ich weiß ehrlich gesagt gar nicht, was ich lieber sehen wollen würde. BTC bei 30k, um All in zu gehen oder BTC bei 200k, um all out zu gehen.
*Am Besten natürlich erst 30, dann 200😅
Deutsch
@KryptoFynn Boah, was müsste passieren um einen Rutsch auf die 30k auszulösen?
Deutsch
$BTC plan unchanged
> peace talks in Islamabad have started
> order books are thin -> conditions for volatility
I stick to my plan
no need to anticipate headlines
outcomes can move the market fast in either direction
for now, context remains slightly suppressed
-> ceasefire ≠ resolution
rest aligns with my current chart analysis
touching some grass
back on charts later
PILTR@Nico_pltrs
$BTC refined trading plan 4H order block strategy I like to use -> backtested it a lot entries layered > lower bound first > scale within the block (.5 I .75) -> all of the ones that react do usually not reach a deviation of .6% above the OB invalidation above high confluence > liq levels > positioning > retracements if price trades into it, that’s the play entries have been precise lately plan stays the same no trigger = no trade
English
@ZeroToZen_ You're changing directions quicker than your underwear 😅
English
$BTC vs $SILVER
Held the HTF structure with no lower low yet, although it came nail biting close. And now we layer on top of that with confluence from a monthly Remora accumulation beam and HPL signals. Beautiful.
GeoMetric@GeoMetric_9
Another one to show what a pivotal point we already are at on the macro. $BTC has never made a lower low vs $Silver in all it's existence but has come nail bitingly close. We also have monthly HPL's printing on this very chart. Silver itself just had a strong rejection of it's macro topping channel just as this happened vs BTC. R:R just makes way too much sense here on several macro charts. I'm not waiting around for some random number lower for sure. Happy to take a loss if I'm wrong. It's not about getting it right, it about knowing where to risk it.
English
@KryptoFynn Hoffentlich hast auch du was gelernt, es gibt kein 100% und kein 0% die Wahrscheinlichkeiten sind da oder die Möglichkeiten bestehen ✌🏼
Deutsch
Unser Tief wurde rausgenommen und mein Szenario, sowie der Fahrplan für die nächsten Wochen wurde invalidiert. Die größte Wahrscheinlichkeit liegt jetzt darin, dass wir in dieser Region (um die 65k) unseren lokalen Boden bilden, bevor wir die Bearflag Unterkante (68,5-70k) als Widerstand bestätigen und dann die Abwärtsphase auf 54k starten.
So der wahrscheinlichste Ausgang meiner Ansicht nach.
Deutsch
@Nico_pltrs Before you said it'll fill that wick and now you say rejection confirmed? I don't see that?
English
$BTC trade setup
> Clean 3R POB setup here.
> entry ~70.7k
> SL ~71.5k
> TP ~68.1k
Rejection confirmed -> valid execution.
Not taking it myself - already scaled into my short earlier.
> Important distinction:
> just because it’s a valid setup
PILTR@Nico_pltrs
📝Trading Strategy - POB Many traders use order blocks - I do too. But while backtesting them on crypto, they often: -> got front-run -> were more reliable on higher timeframes -> or didn’t get triggered at all Instead, price often reacts at more specific levels inside the move. > So I simplified it and built a rule-based framework around it. This is what led to trades like the one below. -> POB-> my variation of order blocks Thread 👇
English
$BTC order flow update
> Funding was deeply negative -> short overweight,
-> now reverting to neutral -> pressure fading
> OI flushed on the dump -> reset, then rebuilt -> new positions without continuation
-> no clear initiative (mix of shorts + covering)
> Spot CVD weak -> no real demand (confirmed by premium)
> Perp CVD initiated the move -> derivatives-led, spot followed proportionally
> Both flattening -> flow losing direction, low volume environment
> Coinbase premium pushed downside, now neutral -> spot no longer in control
Overall:
> Drivers neutralizing while positioning rebuilds
> Impulse -> reset -> repositioning
No side in control
Short term: Likely compression / chop until futures markets open until we see initiative
English
With a proven track record in challenges such as this one, I have started ANOTHER Challenge: $5k-$500k
Multiplying OUR wallets by 100, FOR FREE yet some of you will still keep scrolling.
Me and the rest of the group have already loaded $5,000, and are ACTIVELY COMPOUNDING IT.
This will all be done PUBLICLY & LIVE in my challenge server.
I am already at 13.5K.
Don't fumble, LIKE, FOLLOW & COMMENT "CHALLENGE" to join the server.
English
@Nico_pltrs I don't understand that phase 1 and 2 thing? Are you still in this trade?
English
Brothers...
Tried to upscale myself wit scalping of no risk and highest reward 1:10+ RR . Let's see #sol $sol
ZeroToZen@ZeroToZen_
Shall I name myself $sol trader. Morning / evening. #sol retesting highs, I expect a sweep from 141-142 and then I'll look for shorts. .
English
And right up there they were all euphoric… exactly back at the same key resistance.
You’re welcome $BTC
EliZ@eliz883
This area man $BTC
English
The DiNapoli levels (38.2 + 61.8% fib) from the W1 chart, which I showed two weeks ago, have so far slowed down the decline on $BTC. I expect a bounce toward the 96-98 (38.2% fib + FE100) or 104-109 (50-61.8% fib + FE161.8). Ideally, the price would reach the higher zone so that a head and shoulders pattern could form.
#BTC #Bitcoin
ZiP@zip_ck
$BTC W1 - support level from the previous analysis failed… This is the last zone where bulls have a chance to defend and pull the monthly candle back above 90k #Bitcoin #BTC #CryptoMarket
English