indeed, this union, this indistinguishability, this monism, what else could become a good skeleton for "a new people"
English
Eternal World Isonomia of Love
365 posts
Eternal World Isonomia of Love
@pimpchimpp
I am a convulsive time-machine; Figure of a future Narkompros
Entrou em Şubat 2016
19 Seguindo23 Seguidores
I suppose the true dictatorship of the proletariat, qua the project of state-destruction, would principally also have to consider this problem as central to its mission. But I don't know
English
we should remember that the project holds the premise, eventually, to dissolve the division between intellectual and physical labour. But this is no easy task, the union of the technical and material base with its ideal "double" is given easier in reason than in praxis.
🔻🔻📕Nao@naolovesindo
This type of thinking is something Mao has directly criticized "Stalin emphasized only technology, technical cadre. He wanted nothing but technology, nothing but cadre; no politics, no masses. This too is walking on one leg!" -Concerning Economic Problems of the USSR
English
@JamesJouissance never succeeded (I have no desktop, which seems the only easier way of doing it). Do you not happen to have the files already downloaded that you could share?
English
@JamesJouissance I really need to work on how to loophole the internet archive's "borrow-only" limit for some documents, also thanks!
English
People—Intellectuals, historians, casual readers; like to reduce Lou Andreas-Salomé to the men who adored her—Nietzsche, Rilke, Freud. For those who actually read her, she is the one who saw more deeply into each of them than they could ever see into themselves. 1/
English
do they still make men in Russia like that guy in the eyeglasses or is it an extinct breed?
USSR Pictures@PicturesUssr
Moscow State University, 1970s
English
has anyone figured out yet what Adorno actually meant by the esoteric concept he calls "jazz"?
English
only thing that upsets their senses, unwittingly too, is that a good part of Nietzsche is driven by a desire to philosophize amongst gods rather than humans. Unfortunately he wasn't close enough to it, he knew that rather well though not well enough to understand why
English
@AeonBaudrillard Baudrillard singlehandedly makes me regret liking french philosophers. Truly the "shame of the profession"
English
How can use value be a fetish? Quite literally: a fetish replaces sex, deferring Difference-Fatality in favor of the selfsame, i.e. fetish-ism. Likewise, whenever one eats, one is identically deferring death, the ultimate Difference-Fatality, in favor of the ultimate fetish—life.
English
@JamesJouissance @Johnny2Fingersz I am aware Hume knew a bit of Spinoza at least, and given all the context of his intellectual life how couldn't one argue this; I remember there's also a talk by Della Rocca on Hume's Spinoza; but I was thinking, don't their arguments on knowledge interestingly intersect. . .
English
This is a common confusion. There are three kinds of knowledge. First, symbols and images. Second, reasons. Third, intuition. Symbols and images are inadequate ideas and capable of being false. Reasons and intuitions are adequate.
Nasher@207Nasher
@JamesJouissance That’s possible, why couldn’t you have learned that the theory is wrong?
English
@JamesJouissance @Johnny2Fingersz isn't the second order of knowledge true belief (as opposed to the doxa and images of the first) and reason though? Which isn't unimportant, it leaves open the door for Hume to come join us under the same roof*
English
@Johnny2Fingersz Technically, this is a classification of possible ideas. Beliefs are more or less inadequate ideas, that is opinions, organized symbols, images. But see also Smullyan, Logicians Who Reason About Themselves
English
@aufgehenderRest yeah, I was just switching the terms according to relevance anyway
English
@pimpchimpp I like what you did there but the doctrine of Being is the first Chapter of Hegel's Science of Logic ... lol
English
And just when you think you have overcome Deleuze, that wild, feisty, creative new animal starring back at you is not a Hegel of any sort, or even Plato! Nor a Freud. It is Deleuze!!! Dialectic, anti-dialectic, non-dialectical, from the late Spinoza, to Hume, Leibniz &
Christopher Satoor@aufgehenderRest
And just when you think you have overcome Hegel, that wild, feisty, creative new animal starring back at you is not a Deleuze of any sort, or even Derrida! Nor a Focault. It is Hegel!!! Dialectic, anti-dialectic, non-dialectical, from the late Schelling, to Kierkegaard, Marx &
English
@UnwobblingPivot The Spirit of Gravity; Also Sprach Zarathustra
English
Mencius said, "The tendency of man's nature to good is like the tendency of water to flow downwards." (Mn. 6A.2)
English
(the good thing is nobody cares about what I post so I won't get backlash for forgetting about Bergson)
English
to the wildest animal in Nietzsche, and creature in Kant and Maimon! All pay great homage to Deleuzian child inside of them. Kicking and screaming from the doctrine of Becoming!
English