Maximilian Uriarte retweetou
Maximilian Uriarte
40.5K posts
Maximilian Uriarte
@TLCplMax
I am Max: NYT bestselling author, artist, and animator. Bruin.
Bay Area, CA Entrou em Haziran 2010
570 Seguindo36.4K Seguidores
Maximilian Uriarte retweetou
Maximilian Uriarte retweetou
Maximilian Uriarte retweetou
@TerminalLance The roughest part of my Camp Pendleton barracks roommate coming out to me 20 years ago was when I said “wait, I walk around in my underwear a lot, is that awkward for you?” And he replied “no, I’m not attracted to you”
English
@LastofLazarus @SteveTr3v0r And still none of them can explain how this translates to creating a fake. Did they print a map out? Glue it onto a miniature in a studio? What is the actual mechanism to fake it? (There is none)
English
@SteveTr3v0r @TLCplMax Neither of those methods produces anywhere near the required resolution to match LRO.
LRO has a 50cm resolution.
Beam divergence means that laser topography is limited to *kilometers* at best, and even the best optical telescopes are still over 100m.
English
This ALONE is irrefutable proof the moon landings happened. There’s literally no way to have faked the landscape down to each individual rock and somehow recreated it in some kind of studio environment in 1969. Scans from 2009 match perfectly.
NicSD@NicSD6
@GS_VCactivist Here's a side by side comparison of the apollo 11 landing footage, released in 1969, and a reconstruction of the moons surface along the same route from images taken by the LRO, in 2009: youtube.com/watch?v=YKXw_3…
English
@wolfofariosophy Every single one of you with these vague insinuations but zero explanation on how it was actually done because you have none.
English
@TLCplMax Wait till you learn how movie sets are made
English
@BigBadDiddums I know nothing matters in 2026 but I’m just so tired of dumbfucks bro
English
Ah yes the single moon rock brought back from 6 Apollo missions
OfferusTheGreat@offerusthegreat
@TLCplMax That "Moon" rock proved to be petrified wood.
English
I have an MFA in animation but if you don’t want to believe me you can watch this fun short breakdown of how the VFX requirements of the moon landing would be impossible to fake in 1969: youtu.be/_ML2ZYYFOnI?si…
YouTube
English
Yes. Rocket science ≠ visual effects. Moon landings were pre-Star Wars and we did not have the VFX capabilities to fake the video and photos taken on the moon.
Galactus@SariKunduz
@TLCplMax So in 1972, they were able to send men to the moon and back, but didn't have the means to fake it, you say.
English
Maximilian Uriarte retweetou
@Dethby Technically no, but it was a video game. Calling it something else didn't make it not a video game. At the end of the day, regardless of what Meta wanted to call it, it was just a VR video game.
English
The problem with stuff like the $88 billion metaverse is that it’s made by tech CEO’s that didn’t grow up playing videogames. Any gamer could have told you a mid PS2-era looking VR MMO game was not worth $88 billion.
English
Maximilian Uriarte retweetou
Maximilian Uriarte retweetou
The US Navy Sailors on the USS John P. Murtha greeting the astronauts of Artemis II with a giant blow up Alien LMAO 😭😭😭🤣🤣
English
I guess not—but the videos, photos, physical evidence, moon rocks, overwhelming consensus across scientific communities from every nation (including our geopolitical rivals), and actual records suggest the moon landings were real.
Henry Flashman@HenryFlashman
@TLCplMax "you can tell it's obviously real" is not proof that it's real.
English
Maximilian Uriarte retweetou
The dust from the tires is very interesting to watch because there is no atmosphere, the extremely fine powder just kind of falls back down. In an atmosphere that dust would billow away in huge clouds.
English
I don't think moon landing deniers have ever actually watched any of the moon landing footage. This footage is from 1972 and you can tell is obviously real if you have more than 47 brain cells. There is literally no way to have faked this in 1972. youtube.com/watch?v=az9nFr…
YouTube
English