uncle_ Mo

I just realised that I can’t do this life thing without Morena Jeso

Masturbation is demonic Masturbation is demonic Masturbation is demonic Masturbation is demonic Masturbation is demonic Masturbation is demonic Masturbation is demonic Masturbation is demonic Masturbation is demonic

“The reports about Mandela are not true. There was a bit of a scare with his respiratory equipment at around 20:30, but right now he is alive.” …ass nigga. 😂😂😂😂

There’s no ex of mine that fuxks with me 😭😭😹

You know the SIU can track where money goes, right? So wena you’re a better investigator than the SIU? Anele’s never needed any man to subsidise her lifestyle. Ngiyema ke lapho.

I keep thinking about this

JUST IN: A statement from Bonelela Mgudlwa on the SIU findings. He says he does not agree with the findings of the tribunal. He states that his wife @Anele has no connection to the issues under scrutiny. The Mpumalanga PPE tender worth over R14 million was declared invalid and unlawful. The owners of the company are said to be Katleho Mokonyane and Bonelela Mgudlwa, who were ordered to pay back profit earned. #sabcnews

Now we going to pretend like it’s not SA men who sell drugs in townships??!

Konje AKA once accused your family of being apartheid beneficiaries or something like that neh…

Then they say she didn’t benefit

When it suddenly hits you that, even though you’re a sinner and undeserving, Christ still chose to die for you.

I’ll never forget how the next day after her death was announced we had assembly at school. Usually we had announcement including a moment of silence for those who have passed. My HS had a moment of silence for a whale that died after eating plastic. Mama Winnie didn’t, not even after the black girls tried to say something.

One of the Christian theories we need to get rid off is Jesus Christ being portrait as a white man.

Why do females think not knowing how to cook is cute? “ I only know how to boil eggs”, bathong o stlaela .

Thank you for the compliment 🙏🏽

@baddaysareover “What did she benefit from a 2020 contract,” you are using emotions instead of being rational, so have a great Easter holidays and may God grant you a functional brain sooner❤️

@uncleMo926 What a stupid take. His full names were posted by the SIU. If you were serious about wanting accountability from anyone you’d search the name & find his accounts. What did she benefit from a 2020 contract, before she was even involved with him? Just dumb.

Okay please give us the handle of the man so we can attack him. We only have his wife here on twitter that’s why we are “attacking” her. She benefited

She's gone! 👋

Have you ever seen a tweet that doesn't even concern you, but you immediately go to that person's profile and block them because you don’t want to see any more of their thoughts on your timeline ever again?

Mhlekazi 😹😹😹😭

@Nicole_Barlow1 You are a disgusting racist mokgekolo

From interdict to arrest - a case study in judicial overreach. Let me begin by noting that my experience with the South African courts has, overall, been positive. Over the years, I have been involved in several matters, both as applicant and as respondent, and the outcomes have generally been favourable. This, I believe, is not merely coincidental. Where I have initiated proceedings, I have done so with careful consideration of the merits, and where I have defended matters, I have ensured that I was supported by capable legal representation, the aforementioned, combined with enlightened Judges, secured my fortunes. I have also, despite ultimately prevailing, been subjected to what I regard as malicious and vexatious litigation, by parties who appear to believe that financial strength entitles them to exert pressure on those in a comparatively weaker position. A clear example in my own experience is @bp_SouthAfrica’s proxy, Petro-Props, which instituted proceedings against me on three separate occasions, succeeding only once thanks to that pusillanimous Judge Claassens. That interim judgement, however, later proved consequential in ways that extended beyond the immediate dispute. Experiences such as these have made me particularly alert to the risks posed by flawed judicial decisions and underscore the importance of subjecting such rulings to scrutiny, whether through review or rescission, where appropriate. Courts are not infallible, and though a strong legal system exists precisely because decisions can be revisited, corrected, or overturned, there are times when judicial errors result in such serious consequences that they damage the credibility of the institution itself. The danger is not just in being wrong, but in being wrong in a way that causes immediate and disproportionate harm before corrective measures can intervene. In the case involving Tumi Sole vs Bafana Surprise Mathebula, granting an urgent interdict for defamation - despite the apparent removal of the offending material - raises significant questions about judicial scrutiny and procedural rigour. Urgency, by its nature, requires clear and ongoing harm; invoking it when the alleged harm had arguably already ceased suggests a troubling lowering of that standard. Even more concerning is what happened afterwards: before the respondent had been given the full opportunity, as required by the Uniform Rules of Court, to challenge or respond to the order, the applicant escalated the matter into an urgent contempt application and a warrant of arrest. Such procedural haste risks turning the courts from arbiters of justice into tools of coercion. When legal processes are used in this way, it not only undermines fairness between parties but also damages public confidence, reinforcing the perception that the system can be exploited to devastating effect.