Failbot

1.9K posts

Failbot banner
Failbot

Failbot

@Failbot123

🦝👌🏻👍🏻🇫🇮🇺🇦

Присоединился Ağustos 2014
114 Подписки87 Подписчики
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@emilykschrader How many ships and soldiers did Israel send again? Oh right, none.
English
0
0
0
299
Faytuks Network
Faytuks Network@FaytuksNetwork·
NEW: NATO is willing to play a role in a possible mission in the Strait of Hormuz, Secretary-General Mark Rutte says — Reuters
English
77
134
751
147.4K
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@DonHappenings @ZelenskyyUa It's almost like they already had a treaty kinda like that and nobody gave a shit, why would they give one now?
English
0
0
0
39
Don Happenings
Don Happenings@DonHappenings·
@ZelenskyyUa Withdraw but let it be open border...with signature no more advancement...no local instability meddling...integration...50/50 on collective tax sharing etc...50 on your side...25 going to military, 25 going to public infrastructure....Instead of War breed peace...do business
English
3
0
0
1.8K
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський
We cannot simply speak about withdrawing from Donbas as a matter of compromise. Our withdrawal from Donbas would open up opportunities for the Russian Federation to occupy our most fortified territories without losses. Some people say it would take a year to a year and a half to build new fortifications. But everyone forgets: first and foremost, that is a year and a half. And even if it were less, fortifications in an open field are a completely different matter from those in urban areas. They can never provide equally strong protection. A withdrawal would give the Russian Federation room for large-scale maneuver. They could advance either toward Kharkiv or toward Dnipro, destroying our cities. And two major cities would be at risk – cities that, incidentally, generate a significant share of our GDP. So many people have died there… The morale of our army would certainly decline. There would undoubtedly be a rift in society. The army – which would surely not support such steps – on one side, and society on the other. And division within society is precisely what Putin is aiming for. Moreover, there are currently 200,000 people living in the territories of Donbas that we are defending. Withdrawal does not mean preserving anything. You leave, and without any guarantees, you risk losing everything. And that is a major risk. From an interview with Rai Radio 1 (2/3).
English
451
3.2K
19.9K
965.7K
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@c_groetzinger @ChrisO_wiki Yes and again, the context is that a day or two before Orban told Ukraine to open the pipeline or they will invade.
English
1
0
0
13
Carsten Grötzinger
Carsten Grötzinger@c_groetzinger·
@Failbot123 @ChrisO_wiki Zelensky literally talked about the blockade of the 90 billion in the preceding sentence. That ist the context. Whataboutism is no legitimate argument, and two wrongs don't make one right. It was wrong of Orban to threaten Ukraine and not very smart of Zelensky to say this.
Carsten Grötzinger tweet media
English
1
0
1
11
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@c_groetzinger @ChrisO_wiki No the context was that Orban threatened to invade Ukraine to open the oil pipeline. Again, you are cool with that threat, right?
English
1
0
0
19
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@c_groetzinger @ChrisO_wiki Yeah and the missing context is that Orban threatened to invade Ukraine, but that part is cool for you guys right?
English
1
0
0
24
AmateurPhantom
AmateurPhantom@AmateurPhantom·
@NewEnglandDem @trouble_man90 Please show me where I was talking about her quotes in the video? I am of course referring to his stated policy goals. The things he says on his stream every day. The same points you can see, for free, by engaging with him directly instead of out-of-context quotes and clips.
AmateurPhantom tweet media
English
8
0
19
414
Tim
Tim@trouble_man90·
This 3 minute video sums it all up very nicely
English
152
402
2.3K
347.9K
LiseMarieBlanche
LiseMarieBlanche@LiseMarieSVP·
@Failbot123 @Orylin152 @Harrisbro777 The intent is for a positive relief on global oil markets, not aid to Russia. Not all sanctions removed but some from Belarus bc released hundreds of political prisoners and also the fertilizer materials are important for worldwide food prices. Ukraine aid still in the pipeline.
English
1
0
0
18
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@LiseMarieSVP @Orylin152 @Harrisbro777 Something bot being a positive, which even if it's not a huge amount of money is still a positive btw, doesn't mean it's a hinderence. Also how about those sanctions on Belarus and stopping Ukraine aid? How did those hurt Russia?
English
1
0
0
14
LiseMarieBlanche
LiseMarieBlanche@LiseMarieSVP·
@Failbot123 @Orylin152 @Harrisbro777 It's not a help to Russia. It's basically a neutral move that was done to help stabilize GLOBAL oil markets during this effort to destroy Iran's ability to make nukes.
English
1
0
0
15
LiseMarieBlanche
LiseMarieBlanche@LiseMarieSVP·
@Failbot123 @Orylin152 @Harrisbro777 Treas Sec Bessent says it's "narrowly tailored, short-term measure" aimed at stabilizing global energy markets,would not provide significant new revenue to Russia, since bulk of its oil income comes from extraction taxes rather than these specific cargoes
LiseMarieBlanche tweet media
English
1
0
0
28
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@Heal_within96 Wow Africa looks great! Looks like we are fine to send all the African refugees back there now!
English
0
0
0
23
Nora
Nora@Heal_within96·
This is how White people do documentaries about Africa. They intentionally only show the underdeveloped parts, to perpetuate the 'psychological defeatism' they want the collective global Black people to feel.
English
844
4.2K
23.5K
2.5M
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@LiseMarieSVP @Orylin152 @Harrisbro777 How does getting rid of sanctions on Belarus and a bunch of Russian ship, the month long ease on oil sanctions and stopping all aid to Ukraine hinder Russia exactly?
English
1
0
0
29
LiseMarieBlanche
LiseMarieBlanche@LiseMarieSVP·
@Failbot123 @Orylin152 @Harrisbro777 Trump hinders Russia, despite your Russian collusion hoax beliefs. From supplying Poland w/ Patriot Missile Defense System his 1st term which Obama refused to not upset Putin, to Syria (300 Russians killed by US forces to stop them from getting their oil) to Venezuela to Iran
English
1
0
0
56
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@LiseMarieSVP @Orylin152 @Harrisbro777 Yes the country that wipes their asses with every treaty they've ever signed would totally uphold that one. Lets be real, Trump would be more likely to aid Russia than Europe. So bye bye.
English
1
0
0
38
Failbot
Failbot@Failbot123·
@Moses1150599 @GissiSim So that is a book written by a nutjob. Here is what Gorbachev himself said Also the actual documents are online, you can just go and read them. They talk about Germany reunifying and being in NATO and the Warsaw pact at the same time, they didnt want NATO in the pact side, EAST
Failbot tweet media
English
0
0
10
111
CryHavocAndUnleashBolter
CryHavocAndUnleashBolter@Moses1150599·
@GissiSim In the same way our leaders make public staments today about what global policy is , and we take them seriously In the 90s , the Germans , the Americans , the British and mostly everyone in nato , publicly agreed not to expand east It was a verbal agreement discussed globally
CryHavocAndUnleashBolter tweet media
English
4
0
2
309
The Apollonic
The Apollonic@the_apollonic·
@alexstubb @drpezeshkian While undermining the United States by denial of airspace. You have all made a terrible miscalculation in asserting independence at the worst possible time.
English
8
0
6
1.1K
Alexander Stubb
Alexander Stubb@alexstubb·
I had a call with President of Iran, @drpezeshkian. We discussed the situation in Iran and the Middle East. A ceasefire and a diplomatic solution are urgently needed. I emphasized the need to end the strikes on neighbouring countries and restore freedom of navigation in the Strait Hormuz. Despite the disagreements, it is important to maintain dialogue.
English
2.4K
786
5.8K
677.3K
Sari Arho Havrén
Sari Arho Havrén@SariArhoHavren·
It is interesting how NATO's possible collapse is presented as solely Europe's problem, thereby justifying American pressure and threats on allies. In reality, a breakdown of NATO, an alliance of 32 members, would be a major strategic loss for the United States. The damage would not be limited to losing allies in Europe; as NATO gives Washington a large, institutionalised bloc of advanced economies and militaries that amplifies US power. If that structure unravelled, the US would lose a force multiplier at least across five main dimensions and would face : 1) harder military problems: The US would lose military access (the current situation with Spain, Italy and Poland gives a taste of what that would be like), and would lose interoperability and command advantages 2) higher budgetary burdens over time: removing the alliance architecture would force Washington to compensate for lost allied capability and lost access; allies would, in time, buy weapons from elsewhere; (it would be cheaper to repair the current rupture) 3) reduced geopolitical influence: US global credibility would be damaged far beyond Europe 4) greater economic exposure to European instability 5) weaker global deterrence against revisionist powers, which would not make the US homeland any safer The overall strategic impact would be severe, making the US considerably weaker diplomatically.
English
329
457
2.2K
132.8K
Triode
Triode@Triode_in_situ·
@Failbot123 @hobbie82 @SariArhoHavren No everyday Americans especially veterans like me very much appreciate it. Don’t shit on Americans because you don’t like the current moron in charge of America.
English
2
0
0
13
Triode
Triode@Triode_in_situ·
@Failbot123 @hobbie82 @SariArhoHavren Eurotrash never change. We should have let the Nazis and the Russians have your worthless asses. Won’t make that mistake again.
English
1
0
1
10