Sex is real. Gender is in your head.

3.8K posts

Sex is real. Gender is in your head. banner
Sex is real. Gender is in your head.

Sex is real. Gender is in your head.

@FloatOrSwim

Sex is real. Gender is in your head. Please leave it there.

Wales Присоединился Eylül 2021
1.5K Подписки380 Подписчики
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Outspoken Women
Outspoken Women@women_outspoken·
1/6 Your photo, Helen, shows Dr Sophie Quinney, Medical Director of the Welsh Gender Service, standing beside one of the men she thinks we ought to include in women's sports and changing rooms. A man who spent much of yesterday's demo yelling insults and threats at us. Quinney is
Helen Staniland@helenstaniland

In Cardiff at the #OneYearLater event. Women are discussing their needs for single sex spaces whilst a man in a dress is shouting 'have you ever seen a TERF with any style' through a loudhailer. The difference in the seriousness of the message is extremely stark.

English
45
436
1.5K
142.1K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Helen Staniland
Helen Staniland@helenstaniland·
In Cardiff at the #OneYearLater event. Women are discussing their needs for single sex spaces whilst a man in a dress is shouting 'have you ever seen a TERF with any style' through a loudhailer. The difference in the seriousness of the message is extremely stark.
Helen Staniland tweet media
English
549
1.2K
5.6K
310.2K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
#199 Days Later
#199 Days Later@acts_grassroots·
Grassroots women are uniting across the UK & Europe. We call for the law on single spaces and services to be upheld. Thank you @TheAttagirls for this eloquent tribute to women who paved the way ❤️‍🔥 The fight continues..we are organised, united and resolute 💪 #OneYearLater
Lily Craven@TheAttagirls

Woman of the Day teacher and suffragist Pippa Strachey (1872-1968) of London, the organisational genius behind the very first major suffrage protest, the Mud March, in 1907. That was 119 years ago, yet today, women are gathering in Westminster, Cardiff, Edinburgh, Manchester, Belfast, Plymouth, and Houghton-le-Spring, because once again, the government is ignoring women’s voices and prioritising the feelings of men — a very small subset of men, but men nonetheless - over the rights of women. The Mud March featured a brass band, carriages and motor cars carrying women’s suffrage flags and banners, and 7,000 women wearing matching rosettes, with around forty women’s groups from all over the country taking part. It required much soothing and smoothing by Pippa of "all sensibilities and political disagreements” beforehand to reconcile women’s groups with differing points of view but it was a triumph of diplomacy. Only the Pankhursts’ WSPU declined to attend in an official capacity but many of its leading members were there anyway: Christabel Pankhurst, Annie Kenney, Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence. Today, there will be women’s groups and banners from all over the UK listening to notable speakers drawn from women’s organisations. No “soothing and smoothing of all sensibilities and political disagreements” is needed. We are united and we want one simple thing: for @bphillipsonmp to stop dithering and lay the EHRC guidance before Parliament. Her decision not to do so — and it is a decision — is causing harm to women (and men) and especially to children, because government departments, councils, retailers, employers and schools think they are excused from following the law. 119 years ago, Pippa, who had no experience of organising anything like this, made it a full team effort. The Artists’ Suffrage League produced posters and postcards. The marchers’ rosettes were made by the Actresses’ Franchise League. The London Society for Women’s Suffrage placed ads everywhere to publicise the event and encourage women from all walks of life to attend. Everyone played a part. It was a stroke of genius. Rachel Strachey, close ally of Millicent Fawcett and Pippa’s sister-in-law, wrote: “In that year, the vast majority of women still felt that there was something very dreadful in walking in procession through the streets. To do it was to be something of a martyr, and many of the demonstrators felt that they were risking their employments and endangering their reputations, besides facing a dreadful ordeal of ridicule and public shame.” Does that sound at all familiar? Thousands of women set off down Rotten Row with the brass band leading, Millicent Fawcett at the front, followed large contingents of women from all over the country, marching under banners that proclaimed their various professions and trades. The only thing that couldn’t be planned for was the weather. On the day, it rained incessantly: “mud, mud, mud" everywhere, according to Millicent Fawcett, which is why it was known as the Mud March. Today, it will rain incessantly in Cardiff, which is where I’ll be with my @WomenOfWessex sisters. It won’t put us off, any more than the mud did 119 years ago. We women are made of stern stuff. Back then, The Observer warned that the women’s movement should “educate its own sex rather than seeking to confound men". That’s straight out of NHS Fife and NHS Darlington’s playbook, don’t you think? The pro-suffrage Morning Post (now The Telegraph) deplored the "scoffs and jeers of enfranchised males who had posted themselves along the line of the route, and appeared to regard the occasion as suitable for the display of crude and vulgar jests". The Graphic (later the Daily Sketch), also pro-suffrage, carried a photo of a man dramatically holding up a pair of scissors "suggesting that demonstrating women should have their tongues cut out". Today, we face derision and similar threats from masked men. No, I’m not going to repeat them. You all know exactly how much male fury is unleashed whenever women dare to speak up in defence of their lawful rights. “Both sides”, my foot. Four days after the Mud March, NUWSS leaders met with the Parliamentary Committee for Women's Suffrage to discuss plans for a private member’s Bill proposing that women should have the vote subject to the same property qualification that applied to men. Relatively few women would have qualified and the sponsor was hopeful. The Bill was talked out. It took another eleven years before women over 30 were accorded the right to vote, and 21 years before all women were enfranchised on the same terms as men. The Supreme Court’s clarification of the Equality Act 2010 is almost 365 days old, yet public servants are still hounded for recognising biological sex, NHS staff are still denied access to single-sex changing rooms, women are still denied lawful single-sex services and placed at risk. Lesbians still face exclusion because they do not accept men as lesbians. Women in prison are still locked up with men. All of this is unlawful, Ms Phillipson. All of it. You could put a stop to it tomorrow. You would have the law and the courts on your side, so what’s holding you back? Women are rising. #OneYearLater #SupremeCourtRuling

English
1
26
96
1.6K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head.
@tinternetqueen @wundt_vil @Charlotty And no way that someone has had time to hold them with all these different charities by the age of 25! Charities are obsessed with 'young trustees' but no point pretending they bring a depth of experience to those roles. They haven't had time.
English
1
0
1
22
Sam
Sam@wundt_vil·
‘We can reveal that Mr Westwood has never "worked for the British Red Cross" and it is understood that he has never held a senior role or worked for Mind.’ It’s almost like LGBTYS has learned nothing scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/…
English
33
225
793
39K
Scottish Lesbians
Scottish Lesbians@ScotLesbians·
Maggie Chapman announced that some trans people are 'no longer with us ' as a result of the Supreme Court ruling, that trans people are 'less safe', and that we should 'push the boundaries of inclusion'.
English
15
16
131
7.8K
Scottish Lesbians
Scottish Lesbians@ScotLesbians·
Equality Network and others hosted a hustings tonight and we were there (in the front row, no less). We were all told no filming or photos or we would be ejected, so you'll have to make do with this photo we took before Kezia read out the rules.
Scottish Lesbians tweet media
English
26
90
293
36.3K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Sex Matters
Sex Matters@SexMattersOrg·
Update from Maya! Next week it will be a year since the Supreme Court delivered its landmark judgment that the terms “man” and “woman” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological sex.
Sex Matters tweet media
English
14
125
485
30.7K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Wales-Women’s Rights Network 💜🤍💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿
Wales votes on 7 May 2026 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Much of this election will be won or lost on the doorstep - so if canvassers knock this weekend, ask them: "Does your party commit to same-sex intimate care as the default for women, both in hospital and at home?" Then let us know how they answer. Wales must end the degrading, frightening care experiences women face when they are at their most vulnerable. @WalesGreenParty @RUKWales @WelshLabour @WelshConserv @Plaid_Cymru @WelshLibDems
English
3
24
60
812
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Wales-Women’s Rights Network 💜🤍💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿
Wales votes on 7 May 2026 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Yesterday, the Senedd was officially dissolved - all business, committees, meetings, and draft legislation came to an end. Throughout its term, Welsh Labour had every opportunity to comply with Equality law. It chose not to. The consequences remain: → Local councils operating without proper oversight → Organisations across Wales facing legal uncertainty → NHS Wales refusing to use biologically accurate language → School guidance that indoctrinates our children. What kind of leadership will Wales choose on 7th May ... more of the same, or a law abiding government? @WelshLibDems @WalesGreenParty @RUKWales @WelshLabour @WelshConserv @Plaid_Cymru
English
8
59
120
1.4K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Diana
Diana@ArtemisRising81·
Voting in Wales 7th May 2026 BE AWARE you are voting for a political party's MANIFESTO. You are not voting for candidates. The party will select Senedd MPs based on their promise to keep the pledges in the MANIFESTO. For PLAID this means SELF ID for any man would wants to pretend to be a woman. Erasure of women's rights.
Diana tweet media
English
13
73
162
12.1K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Wales-Women’s Rights Network 💜🤍💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿
Do you believe that this man 👇 is a woman just because he says he is? Nicola Sturgeon and @theSNP got into a right mess over self ID. Yet @Plaid_Cymru have learnt zip. Their manifesto contains a pledge to seek self ID in Wales. We’ll see you in court if you try that Rhun. Welsh women and girls need to be aware. Men who care about the women and girls in their life need to be aware. There is nothing ‘progressive’ about this. It’s a regressive and hostile attack on women’s rights. 1/
Wales-Women’s Rights Network 💜🤍💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 tweet media
English
12
77
215
5.6K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head.
Slow handclap for the 'inclusion' activist who drove this woman out of her job.
The Free Speech Union@SpeechUnion

📣🚨Karen Webb, an NHS specialist nurse with 42 years’ experience working with older people, faced losing her honorary Queen’s Nurse title after being reported for gender-critical posts on X. The situation began during what should have been a standard team meeting. In the informal chat before proceedings began, Karen, in response to another colleague, expressed support for the Olympic Committee’s decision to exclude male athletes from women’s sporting categories. Within minutes, she received a private message from the Trust’s Head of Equality and Inclusion, informing her that she had “upset a lot of people”. The following day, she was told that her “attitude” towards transgender individuals needed to be discussed. Three months later, Karen was called to a formal meeting with senior figures at Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, where she was questioned about her views on trans people and her ability to provide them with compassionate care. Believing the matter to have been resolved, Karen was then contacted by the Queen’s Institute of Community Nursing (QICN), which informed her that it had received a complaint about alleged “transphobia” and “bigotry”. She was instructed to delete her social media posts or risk losing her honorary title. The experience caused her significant and understandable distress. At that point, Karen turned to the Free Speech Union for support. The FSU wrote to QICN on her behalf, setting out her legally protected right to hold and express gender-critical beliefs under the Equality Act 2010. Shortly thereafter, QICN dropped its investigation and issued a full apology, acknowledging that there was “no case to answer” and that Karen had “done nothing wrong”. Following a Subject Access Request (SAR), it emerged that the complaint had been made by a senior activist colleague, who had also disclosed information from a confidential internal process – despite that matter having been closed without any disciplinary action. This disclosure appeared to be a malicious attempt to damage Karen’s professional reputation and facilitate the removal of her honorary title. A subsequent grievance investigation by the NHS Trust upheld Karen’s complaint, finding that confidential information had been improperly shared with QICN. The Trust accepted that Karen had a reasonable expectation that discussions within the internal process would remain private, and confirmed that this expectation had been breached. The Trust has since stated that “appropriate action will be taken” to ensure lessons are learned and similar incidents do not occur again. Although the Free Speech Union was ultimately able to protect Karen’s title and prevent disciplinary action, the experience has left a lasting impact. Now retired, she reflects that the episode has cast a shadow over what should have been the culmination of a long and dedicated career in nursing. This sad episode resulted in Karen deciding it was time to retire. We are proud to have supported Karen during this difficult time. Cases like hers are far from isolated – more than 40 per cent of the Free Speech Union’s casework now involves individuals facing repercussions for expressing gender-critical beliefs, which are protected under the Equality Act 2010. Watch Karen share her story and join the Free Speech Union below 👇

English
0
0
2
43
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Read some Piaget please!
Read some Piaget please!@prof_curiosity1·
What the Finnish data on gender affirmative care shows and why it matters The Kaltiala study onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/Q28XIYN9… in Acta Paediatrica this month is among the most methodologically serious pieces of research to emerge from the paediatric gender medicine debate. It draws on Finland's comprehensive national health registers, a resource that allows conclusions of unusual confidence in a field where small samples and lost follow up have plagued the evidence base. The study followed 2,083 young people referred to gender identity services in Finland between 1996 and 2019, comparing them against 16,643 matched controls. Psychiatric morbidity in the gender-referred group ran at 45.7% before referral, against 15% in matched controls. That baseline disparity alone raises serious questions about whether gender distress in this population is the primary clinical presentation or a secondary feature of more pervasive psychological difficulty. The more significant finding concerns what happened after referral and treatment. Two or more years after referral, psychiatric morbidity had risen to 61.7% in the gender-referred group, while remaining at 14.6% in controls. The gap between the two groups did not narrow following clinical intervention. It widened. This is not a treatment signal. It is the absence of one. The study authors concluded that for some adolescents, gender dysphoria may be an outgrowth of deeper psychological problems, and that adoption of a transgender identity may amount to a maladaptive coping mechanism. This conclusion, offered carefully and in measured clinical language, represents a significant departure from the assumptions underpinning the affirmative model. It is also precisely the kind of clinical observation that has been systematically marginalised in professional debate for the better part of a decade. The same research group's earlier mortality study established that the main predictor of mortality in this population is psychiatric morbidity, and that medical gender reassignment does not have an impact on suicide risk. This finding deserves particular attention because the claim that affirmation is lifesaving has functioned as the primary argument for overriding clinical caution, parental concern, and the ordinary safeguarding standards that paediatric medicine applies in every other context. The Finnish data does not support that claim. Viewed through the lens of child development, the picture that emerges is coherent and troubling. Bowlby, Ainsworth, and Fonagy established that presentations combining bodily alienation, identity disturbance, and severe mood and anxiety disorder are characteristic of disorganised attachment and mentalisation failure. These are fundamentally relational difficulties requiring relational clinical responses. A pathway that addresses such presentations as evidence of a gender identity requiring affirmation and medical intervention is not engaging with the clinical reality. It is bypassing it. Winnicott's account of the False Self is also relevant here. An identity formed and consolidated under conditions of psychological distress and institutional reinforcement feels entirely authentic to the person living it. That felt authenticity is not evidence that the identity is the appropriate clinical focus. Medicalising the presentation before the underlying distress has been adequately assessed and treated forecloses the exploratory space that genuine recovery requires. Over the study period, patients presented in increasing numbers and at younger ages, with severe mood disorders and anxiety disorders the most common psychiatric diagnoses in the gender-referred group. This demographic pattern is consistent with Bronfenbrenner's ecological framework, which predicts rapid increases in presentation when a new identity framework is adopted simultaneously across multiple system levels. It is not consistent with the explanation that a previously hidden population is simply accessing care that was always appropriate for them. What the Finnish data describes, read carefully and without the interpretive framework of the affirmative model, is a population of psychologically distressed young people, predominantly adolescent girls, who entered gender identity services already significantly unwell and who remained significantly more unwell than their peers after intervention. The clinical and ethical implications of that finding have not yet been adequately reckoned with by the institutions and professional bodies that promoted and implemented the affirmative pathway. They need to be.
English
18
258
596
19.7K
Sex is real. Gender is in your head. ретвитнул
Graham Linehan
Graham Linehan@Glinner·
Here is our incomplete list of 236 named cases of trans-identified males convicted of violent or sexual offences against women and/or children.
Graham Linehan tweet media
English
125
2.6K
8K
241K