Barry Schiff

33.7K posts

Barry Schiff banner
Barry Schiff

Barry Schiff

@KissIsTheKey

Retired Chief Architect. Musk’s Vision+Skills Unique. Tesla Investor & MY Owner. Healthy Living. Old Man Wisdom. Tesla referral link: https://t.co/w3gFEZnXHh

Присоединился Haziran 2023
198 Подписки3.7K Подписчики
Закреплённый твит
Barry Schiff
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey·
Pay attention- It’s time for action!
English
412
5
24
31K
Barry Schiff
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey·
6. Excess serious adverse events (SAEs) in vaccinated vs. placebo arms: Reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna trial data (e.g., Fraiman et al. 2022) found 36–57% higher risk of serious AESIs (risk difference ~12.5 per 10,000). Critics call this statistically significant harm Pfizer ignored. (Original trials showed SAEs balanced overall; reanalysis used Brighton Collaboration list and has been critiqued for methodology.) 7. Early knowledge of limited efficacy and breakthrough infections/transmission failure: Internal docs from ~1 month post-rollout noted the vaccine didn’t fully stop COVID (or transmission). Critics say this was hidden while mandates pushed “stops spread.” (EUA was for preventing severe disease/hospitalization; real-world data evolved with variants.) 8. Alleged hiding/manipulation of key safety data in FDA submissions: Beyond biodistribution, critics point to omitted or sanitized preclinical results (e.g., organ accumulation) and trial issues like rapid placebo unblinding. (FDA reviewed what was submitted; full packages were part of the FOIA release.) 9. Early signals of myocarditis, pericarditis, neurological, and clotting issues: Post-marketing reports flagged these (plus menstrual irregularities) soon after rollout. Critics (and some Moderna data) say signals were stronger/downplayed, especially in young males. (These are now acknowledged as rare known risks, with infection itself posing higher myocarditis risk; monitoring continues.) 10. Reproductive/fertility and long-term toxicity concerns from animal/preclinical data: Docs referenced potential ovarian accumulation, antisperm antibodies, or lack of full long-term studies. Critics tie this to population-level fertility drops or “crimes against humanity” claims. (Animal studies were submitted; human data and large-scale studies have not confirmed fertility harm.) These interpretations fueled books (e.g., The Pfizer Papers), lawsuits, and ongoing debates. For Moderna, parallel critiques often reference the same Fraiman reanalysis (higher SAEs) and stronger myocarditis signals in some datasets, though fewer bulk documents were released via the specific 75-year FOIA. Official positions (Pfizer, FDA, CDC, global regulators) maintain the vaccines’ benefits outweighed risks, with rare side effects monitored, and most “revelations” as expected pharmacovigilance data—not hidden scandals. The full documents are publicly available via phmpt.org for independent review.
English
0
0
0
3
Barry Schiff
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey·
Here’s Groks quick list. I’ve seen these and many more, do your own research if you’re truly interested. If you’re here to catch me in a game of stump the chump, I’ll opt out. Good luck Grok🧵 Here are ten of the most frequently cited “damning” revelations that critics (including analysts like Naomi Wolf/DailyClout, Steve Kirsch, and groups reviewing the PHMPT-released Pfizer documents) have highlighted from the court-ordered FOIA releases of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine data. These stem primarily from the ~450,000 pages of Pfizer clinical trial, post-marketing surveillance, and related regulatory filings that the FDA originally wanted released over 75 years but a federal judge ordered faster (starting ~55,000 pages/month in 2022). Similar critiques exist for Moderna mRNA data from trial reanalyses and post-authorization reports, though the high-profile 75-year FOIA battle and bulk releases centered on Pfizer. Critics argue these show hidden risks, data manipulation, or inefficacy that regulators downplayed. Fact-checkers and health authorities counter that most involve unverified passive reports (not proven causal), lists of things to monitor (not confirmed side effects), and overall data supporting a favorable benefit-risk profile amid a pandemic. Many claims have been labeled misinterpretations (e.g., adverse events ≠ causation). I’ll note the document sources and common counterpoints for context, as truth-seeking requires it. 1. 1,223 deaths and 42,086 adverse event reports in the first 90 days post-EUA (Dec 2020–Feb 2021): Document 5.3.6 (post-marketing experience) lists these from global surveillance. Critics call it proof of early mass harm Pfizer allegedly minimized. (Pfizer noted no new safety signals and favorable benefit-risk; reports are unsolicited and unverified, like VAERS-style data.) 2. 9-page appendix listing 1,291 “adverse events of special interest” (AESIs) to monitor: This alphabetical list (from the same 5.3.6 report) includes myocarditis, miscarriages, neurological issues, thrombosis, and even rare conditions like “foaming at the mouth.” Critics say it reveals Pfizer knew of broad dangers. (It’s a pre-specified monitoring list of potential signals, not confirmed vaccine-caused events; includes unrelated things like congenital conditions.) 3. Biodistribution data showing lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and mRNA spread systemically: Studies (e.g., Japanese PMDA submissions referenced in releases) showed components accumulating in liver, spleen, ovaries, testes, brain, etc., not just the injection site. Critics (including recent reports spotlighted by Robert Malone) accuse Pfizer of cropping images/redacting for FDA to hide this. (Regulators reviewed full data; distribution was expected for mRNA tech and deemed acceptable at the time.) 4. High rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes: Post-authorization data tracked ~270 pregnancies with reports of spontaneous abortions, fetal deaths, and other issues (critics like DailyClout/Naomi Wolf cite figures like 80%+ loss in some tracked cases or 44% miscarriage rate). Seen as evidence of reproductive toxicity. (Data was incomplete/lost-to-follow-up; fact-checks note miscalculations, e.g., counting placebo cases or double-counting, and large studies show no increased miscarriage risk from vaccination.) 5. Evidence of negative vaccine efficacy (increased COVID risk): Reanalysis of Phase 3 trial data (N-antibody testing on all participants) allegedly shows vaccinated people ~8.7% more likely to get infected (e.g., Kirsch’s calculation adjusting for antibody differences). Critics say this proves the shots backfired. (Original trial showed 95% efficacy against symptomatic disease; critics argue undercounting in vaccinated due to antibody suppression.)
English
2
0
0
18
Dr Aseem Malhotra
Dr Aseem Malhotra@DrAseemMalhotra·
BREAKING: Covid jab skipped vital safety checks 'due to time constraints', German Covid inquiry told ‘A former chief toxicologist for Pfizer said the mRNA jabs were not checked for any cancer causing properties’ There needs to be a global moratorium on these products ASAP gbnews.com/health/covid-j…
Dr Aseem Malhotra tweet media
English
161
1.6K
3.6K
77.6K
Barry Schiff
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey·
Pay attention- It’s time for action!
English
412
5
24
31K
Barry Schiff ретвитнул
Catherine Herridge
Catherine Herridge@C__Herridge·
BRENNAN'S LEGAL JEOPARDY: Justice Dept. request for classified records related to former CIA Director John Brennan is a very serious escalation, especially if the records show Brennan doubled down on his Steele Dossier claims. Under oath, Brennan told Congress in 2017 the Democrat funded opposition research was NOT "in any way used as a basis" for the US Intelligence Assessment about Russia's activities during the 2016 presidential election. But records released @DNIGabbard @CIADirector SHOW Brennan was WARNED NOT to include the Steele Dossier by intelligence professionals, but Brennan insisted on including the Dossier because he liked the narrative. Through his lawyer, Brennan has denied wrongdoing. Link to FULL CIA documents and Brennan 2017 testimony 👇
Catherine Herridge tweet media
English
223
2.9K
6.9K
98.9K
Libs of TikTok
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok·
HOLY CRAP Kathaleen McCormick, a Democrat-appointed judge overseeing lawsuits against @ElonMusk, posted online CELEBRATING verdicts AGAINST Elon. This rogue judge needs to be REMOVED!
Libs of TikTok tweet media
English
964
11.7K
34.7K
359.8K
Barry Schiff ретвитнул
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
HOLY F*CK IT WASN'T JUST MILLIONS... IT WAS BILLIONS of dollars of fraud in California, just like what Trump said there would be, according to House Oversight Chair Comer. "A state audit just came out and confirmed that there's at least $3.5 BILLION in hospice fraud, primarily in Los Angeles County, California." What the HECK has @GavinNewsom done to California and its taxpayers? Disgusting.
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman

🚨 BUSTED: Fox just EXPOSED hundreds of MILLIONS in California taxpayer healthcare FRAUD! Nick Shirley’s movement is blowing it wide open, now big networks are all over it, and Gavin Newsom is GETTING TORCHED! 0ver 76,000 claims for $600,000,000.00

English
1K
10.4K
25.2K
474.3K
Barry Schiff ретвитнул
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
WOW 🚨 Investigation finds the money Chicago Democrats started funneling into NGOs for community violence intervention programs grew more than 15x faster than the police department's budget Over $1 BILLION dollars and they’re stealing the money Just 1 guy stole $700,000 The man “was charged with murder, burglary, and nearly $700,000 worth of theft. At the time of his arrest, he had four active arrest warrants. When I saw this story, I had a simple question, how often are peacekeepers getting arrested? So I started digging and I found 28 other arrests over the past three years involving people who identified themselves as peacekeepers or violence interrupters, or were wearing peacekeeper vests” - Free Press The “community groups” are Chicago CRED (the organization behind the Peacekeepers program) and other Community Violence Intervention (CVI) initiatives in Chicago, they’re all nonprofit organizations
English
141
3.1K
7K
106K
Barry Schiff
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey·
@ZackStieber Criminal, In my opinion.
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey

In an Insane World, It Was the Only Sane Choice - Why I Didn’t Take the COVID-19 Vaccine In my opinion, you don’t need to be an MD or PhD to recognize that significant financial interests, and potentially other motives, were at play in the COVID-19 saga that began in 2019. These should have raised the hair on any thinking person’s neck, prompting extreme skepticism about the rapid, ever-changing narratives that were unfolding—and, in many respects, continue to unfold today. I often find the best approach in a highly dynamic, information-scarce situation is to do nothing, at least initially, especially when certain courses of action being pushed are irreversible. All my instincts, honed over a long career as a engineer working on some of the most technologically advanced and complex systems the world has ever seen, were tingling—in fact, screaming—that something was deeply wrong. I tried to convince those close to me, often initially without success, not to take the shots. It was immensely frustrating to offer opinions contrary to the “consensus” curated by a massive machine—comprising education, medical, government, and mass media institutions, among others—all, of course, “encouraged” by the largest political and advertising funder the world has ever seen: the pharmaceutical industrial complex. But if I hadn’t at least tried, I could never have forgiven myself. Unfortunately, my worst fears appear to have been realized, and more is coming to light for the wider public daily. In my opinion, this story is a devastating indictment of our institutions and their corruptibility. Some Early Warning Signs That Rang My Alarm Bells I’m a big-picture thinker who dives into details and then reconciles what I find to refine my big-picture thoughts, forming hypotheses that, when appropriate, guide my selected course of action. Given that backdrop, here are some of the big-picture warning signs that didn’t sit right with me. ⚠️ No Publicly Available All-Cause Mortality Rates, Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated, Tracked and Shown Why was this crucial statistic—the all-cause death rates of the vaccinated (from the second the first shot was given) versus the unvaccinated (potentially grouped by age and geographic location)—not publicly tracked and highlighted? Given the emergency authorization and rushed approval, a top-level rollup statistic like this, which is easy to measure and hard to manipulate, would be critical to track and publicize in real-time as we encourage people to discover and take the most effective course of action. It appears to me that the only logical conclusion for not seeing this on every news outlet in real-time is that the data didn’t tell the story those pushing the vaccine policy wanted. If the shots were effective, this daily measure and its clear, widespread publication would have encouraged more people to participate. Spoiler alert: the analyses by third parties I recall seeing, based on some data reported in the UK that did seep out, looked horrible in this regard. I seem to recall the analysis looked really awful from a pro-vaccine standpoint. In other words, it suggested that if you took the vaccine, you were much more likely to die earlier than if you did not, for any and all reasons—in other words, the all-cause death rates were higher in the vaccinated group. The fact that we still don’t see this data and analysis should give everyone who took the shots nightmares. It should give all of us nightmares that our society’s systems could be so corrupted as to actively hide critical bottom-line data like this. I believe the life insurance industry fully knows what’s going on here, and the story is not a good one. The graphic at bottom of this post shows a conceptual example of the graph we should have seen but did not. Official COVID statistics websites from the government showed COVID lethality graphs broken down by age (and, by the way, these were highly questionable because reports and data suggest the medical complex was encouraged to overclassify deaths as COVID deaths back then), but we never saw vaccinated vs. unvaccinated all-cause death rates. It certainly appears that they avoided publishing data like this because a "VACCINE-IS-HORRIBLE" graph would have emerged, necessitating an immediate halt to the entire operation. We should have seen graphs like this for each geographic area (e.g., country) and age bracket used in government COVID lethality statistics (<18, 18–44, 44–64, 65–74, 75+), updated at least weekly. By its very definition, an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) carries extremely high risk. Failing to track and widely publicize top-level, hard-to-manipulate statistics for an EUA treatment is frankly inexcusable and strongly suggests deliberate deceit. ⚠️ From Gold Standard Testing to No Standard Testing As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, I closely followed the daily COVID briefings from the administration. Early on, I recall Fauci publicly responding to Trump when he asked during the briefings what could be done to accelerate the vaccine testing and approval process. Fauci emphasized the importance of the gold standard and explained that proper testing for a human vaccine takes decades. Having worked a lifetime on some of the world’s largest and most complex multi-year technology programs, I deeply appreciated Fauci’s emphasis on the need for extensive vaccine testing. In my experience with complex man-made systems, testing is never foolproof, and the amount of testing required to achieve confidence in a newly designed or built complex system increases exponentially with its complexity. When I extrapolate this to the human body—its intricate mechanisms and the vast unknowns still surrounding it—I recognize that the man-made systems I worked on were orders of magnitude less complex and had far fewer unknowns than a novel experimental treatment for the human body. Thus, Fauci’s call for multi-decade testing made perfect sense to me. However, over time, this dynamic shifted dramatically. I believe Fauci, in collaboration with others, ultimately exploited Trump’s desire for a “warp speed” solution, acting against the best interests of the public, the Trump administration, freedom, honesty, and the reputation of the medical establishment itself, all for short-term goals and personal gain. ⚠️ Fighting Generic Therapeutics to Justify Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) – Natural Immunity Deemed Insufficient When COVID-19 emerged, I was caring for a sick parent, which required extensive travel. Being in excellent health and confident in my resilience, I wasn’t overly concerned about contracting COVID. If I did, I trusted I would recover and gain natural immunity. However, I was closely monitoring the situation due to concern for my elderly parent and the impact the reactive, socially restrictive, and fear-driven environment that was emerging would have on my children and society at large. During this time, I came across the work of Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko, an Orthodox Jewish family physician based in Kiryas Joel, New York. In early 2020, Dr. Zelenko gained prominence for promoting a three-drug combination of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), azithromycin, and zinc sulfate, which he called the “Zelenko Protocol,” as a treatment for COVID-19. He developed this treatment—before any vaccine or other treatment was available—by studying papers published on government health websites, searching for anything that might help his patient base, who were highly susceptible to adverse outcomes due to their age and generally poorer health (e.g., weight issues, lack of exercise, and typical ailments of older Americans). He observed an alarming increase in patients contracting the illness and flooding his office. Dr. Zelenko reported successfully treating hundreds of patients with his protocol. On March 23, 2020, he wrote an open letter to President Donald Trump, urging the adoption of his treatment regimen. His claims drew significant attention, with Trump and allies like Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows publicly endorsing the protocol. In July 2020, Dr. Zelenko co-authored a retrospective study on 141 COVID-19 outpatients treated with his protocol. The study showed that patients on the protocol recovered without needing hospitalization and had better outcomes than those treated only after their condition worsened enough to warrant hospital admission. According to Zelenko, early at-home treatment using his simple protocol was highly beneficial, not only from a cost perspective but also for survivability. So, what happened? The pharmaceutical industry, along with its most financially supported beneficiaries (i.e., media and politicians), launched an attack. Why would they do such a thing, you might ask? I can only speculate on some possible reasons. My Speculation: The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) process for medical products, including the COVID-19 vaccines, is governed by Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. A key requirement for granting an EUA is that there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative treatment or preventive measure for the condition or disease in question. If hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or ivermectin—both readily available, approved for other uses, categorized as some of the safest drugs on the market, and inexpensive generics (off-patent)—proved effective for COVID-19, it would have undermined the EUA for the largely untested, rushed-to-market COVID “vaccine.” As an aside, many argue against calling the COVID vaccine a traditional vaccine due to its entirely different approach and technology, but that’s a separate discussion for another time. I asked Grok to estimate the pharmaceutical industry’s revenue and profit during the first few years of the pandemic. Here are the figures it provided. I suspect the actual numbers may be even higher, but these are substantial regardless: Grand Totals (2020–2023) • Revenue: • Vaccines: ~$135–$150 billion • PCR Tests: ~$50–$70 billion • Other Items: ~$35–$40 billion • Total: ~$220–$260 billion • Profit: • Vaccines: ~$95–$105 billion • PCR Tests: ~$12.5–$17.5 billion • Other Items: ~$8–$12 billion • Total: ~$115–$135 billion Beyond financial motives, larger issues—potentially significant to major industries and political players—may have been at stake, such as: >> The need to deploy mRNA technology in human trials for the first time, something the pharmaceutical industry had been attempting unsuccessfully for decades. >> Adding more required vaccines for everyday activities (e.g., school, work). >> Establishing a precedent for accelerated mRNA development and deployment, bypassing the extensive testing previously required. >> Testing the public’s response to emergency powers that severely restrict freedoms. >> Some even speculate that population control may have played a role. Summary The way people became tyrannical, some even publicly stating that those who didn’t want an experimental treatment should just die or, at the very least, be denied normal life in “civil society,” was, in my view, outright dystopian and humanity at its worst. Many governments quickly leveraged the fear to test the boundaries of authoritarianism that the populace would tolerate, with measures like dictated business shutdowns, church shutdowns, school shutdowns, requiring knowledge of everyone’s medical history, vaccine passports, and a host of other intrusive control policies you really don’t want a government to have the power to enforce, if you have any sense at all, in my opinion. What has become even more evident as the dirt piles behind the curtains continue to gain wider visibility to the general public is that the level of testing and hidden adverse impacts looks atrocious, and they all knew about it from the start. In my opinion, this whole episode will go down in history as humanity’s worst performance ever. So many institutions, businesses, families, and lives have been demolished; it really is an epic-level travesty and societal failure. There are so many other elements to what unfolded, and frankly, none of it reflects well on humanity. I hope you’re starting to at least ask yourself a few questions if you weren’t already. I could go on and on, providing papers that were available from the beginning, artifacts that reflect extremely badly on bad actors, and many other bits of information, but it would overwhelm most—it’s just so unbelievably bad. So, I’ll spare you; if you’re motivated, you’ll find most of it if you haven't already. By the way, I came down with COVID after getting stuck in an airport that had a bomb scare early in the pandemic, before a vaccine was even available. I was in this packed-to-the-gills, busy US airport for 18 hours with everyone else in creation. By the time I got home, off the plane, and started my 90-minute drive home, I was feeling like crap and knew I had COVID. I called my wife on the drive home, told her, and offered to sleep in the basement. Her response: “Don’t be silly, I want to get the darn thing already so I can have natural immunity too. She didn’t even get it from me at that time. I used online, brave doctors bucking narrative trends, got a script for HCQ, and basically followed the “Zelenko Protocol.” I was fully recovered from all adverse effects in three days. It never got that bad for me. When a vaccine did come out and they were trying to tell people that natural immunity wasn’t a thing or good enough, it was yet another red flag for me that other agendas were afoot. I worked remotely for my employer for a year during this fiasco, then retired. The nonsense response from many companies, following the government’s lead, was more than I wanted to take, and luckily, I was ready to retire anyhow. I won’t get into the game of this doctor’s study saying X, but another doctor’s study saying not-X, and which one is more trustworthy. All I can say is the old saying, “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” applies here. I see so much smoke, it’s hard to see more than a foot in front of me sometimes. My view is that society has enormous healing to do from this entire episode. Before we can truly heal, we must first acknowledge what really occurred. May we walk this path and shape a future where such a tragedy never happens again.

English
0
0
1
169
Barry Schiff ретвитнул
Zachary Stieber
Zachary Stieber@ZackStieber·
Exclusive: The White House during the Biden administration edited federal health officials' messaging on stroke after COVID-19 vaccination, newly released records show
Zachary Stieber tweet mediaZachary Stieber tweet media
English
69
897
2K
219.6K
Barry Schiff
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey·
In an Insane World, It Was the Only Sane Choice - Why I Didn’t Take the COVID-19 Vaccine In my opinion, you don’t need to be an MD or PhD to recognize that significant financial interests, and potentially other motives, were at play in the COVID-19 saga that began in 2019. These should have raised the hair on any thinking person’s neck, prompting extreme skepticism about the rapid, ever-changing narratives that were unfolding—and, in many respects, continue to unfold today. I often find the best approach in a highly dynamic, information-scarce situation is to do nothing, at least initially, especially when certain courses of action being pushed are irreversible. All my instincts, honed over a long career as a engineer working on some of the most technologically advanced and complex systems the world has ever seen, were tingling—in fact, screaming—that something was deeply wrong. I tried to convince those close to me, often initially without success, not to take the shots. It was immensely frustrating to offer opinions contrary to the “consensus” curated by a massive machine—comprising education, medical, government, and mass media institutions, among others—all, of course, “encouraged” by the largest political and advertising funder the world has ever seen: the pharmaceutical industrial complex. But if I hadn’t at least tried, I could never have forgiven myself. Unfortunately, my worst fears appear to have been realized, and more is coming to light for the wider public daily. In my opinion, this story is a devastating indictment of our institutions and their corruptibility. Some Early Warning Signs That Rang My Alarm Bells I’m a big-picture thinker who dives into details and then reconciles what I find to refine my big-picture thoughts, forming hypotheses that, when appropriate, guide my selected course of action. Given that backdrop, here are some of the big-picture warning signs that didn’t sit right with me. ⚠️ No Publicly Available All-Cause Mortality Rates, Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated, Tracked and Shown Why was this crucial statistic—the all-cause death rates of the vaccinated (from the second the first shot was given) versus the unvaccinated (potentially grouped by age and geographic location)—not publicly tracked and highlighted? Given the emergency authorization and rushed approval, a top-level rollup statistic like this, which is easy to measure and hard to manipulate, would be critical to track and publicize in real-time as we encourage people to discover and take the most effective course of action. It appears to me that the only logical conclusion for not seeing this on every news outlet in real-time is that the data didn’t tell the story those pushing the vaccine policy wanted. If the shots were effective, this daily measure and its clear, widespread publication would have encouraged more people to participate. Spoiler alert: the analyses by third parties I recall seeing, based on some data reported in the UK that did seep out, looked horrible in this regard. I seem to recall the analysis looked really awful from a pro-vaccine standpoint. In other words, it suggested that if you took the vaccine, you were much more likely to die earlier than if you did not, for any and all reasons—in other words, the all-cause death rates were higher in the vaccinated group. The fact that we still don’t see this data and analysis should give everyone who took the shots nightmares. It should give all of us nightmares that our society’s systems could be so corrupted as to actively hide critical bottom-line data like this. I believe the life insurance industry fully knows what’s going on here, and the story is not a good one. The graphic at bottom of this post shows a conceptual example of the graph we should have seen but did not. Official COVID statistics websites from the government showed COVID lethality graphs broken down by age (and, by the way, these were highly questionable because reports and data suggest the medical complex was encouraged to overclassify deaths as COVID deaths back then), but we never saw vaccinated vs. unvaccinated all-cause death rates. It certainly appears that they avoided publishing data like this because a "VACCINE-IS-HORRIBLE" graph would have emerged, necessitating an immediate halt to the entire operation. We should have seen graphs like this for each geographic area (e.g., country) and age bracket used in government COVID lethality statistics (<18, 18–44, 44–64, 65–74, 75+), updated at least weekly. By its very definition, an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) carries extremely high risk. Failing to track and widely publicize top-level, hard-to-manipulate statistics for an EUA treatment is frankly inexcusable and strongly suggests deliberate deceit. ⚠️ From Gold Standard Testing to No Standard Testing As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, I closely followed the daily COVID briefings from the administration. Early on, I recall Fauci publicly responding to Trump when he asked during the briefings what could be done to accelerate the vaccine testing and approval process. Fauci emphasized the importance of the gold standard and explained that proper testing for a human vaccine takes decades. Having worked a lifetime on some of the world’s largest and most complex multi-year technology programs, I deeply appreciated Fauci’s emphasis on the need for extensive vaccine testing. In my experience with complex man-made systems, testing is never foolproof, and the amount of testing required to achieve confidence in a newly designed or built complex system increases exponentially with its complexity. When I extrapolate this to the human body—its intricate mechanisms and the vast unknowns still surrounding it—I recognize that the man-made systems I worked on were orders of magnitude less complex and had far fewer unknowns than a novel experimental treatment for the human body. Thus, Fauci’s call for multi-decade testing made perfect sense to me. However, over time, this dynamic shifted dramatically. I believe Fauci, in collaboration with others, ultimately exploited Trump’s desire for a “warp speed” solution, acting against the best interests of the public, the Trump administration, freedom, honesty, and the reputation of the medical establishment itself, all for short-term goals and personal gain. ⚠️ Fighting Generic Therapeutics to Justify Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) – Natural Immunity Deemed Insufficient When COVID-19 emerged, I was caring for a sick parent, which required extensive travel. Being in excellent health and confident in my resilience, I wasn’t overly concerned about contracting COVID. If I did, I trusted I would recover and gain natural immunity. However, I was closely monitoring the situation due to concern for my elderly parent and the impact the reactive, socially restrictive, and fear-driven environment that was emerging would have on my children and society at large. During this time, I came across the work of Dr. Vladimir “Zev” Zelenko, an Orthodox Jewish family physician based in Kiryas Joel, New York. In early 2020, Dr. Zelenko gained prominence for promoting a three-drug combination of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), azithromycin, and zinc sulfate, which he called the “Zelenko Protocol,” as a treatment for COVID-19. He developed this treatment—before any vaccine or other treatment was available—by studying papers published on government health websites, searching for anything that might help his patient base, who were highly susceptible to adverse outcomes due to their age and generally poorer health (e.g., weight issues, lack of exercise, and typical ailments of older Americans). He observed an alarming increase in patients contracting the illness and flooding his office. Dr. Zelenko reported successfully treating hundreds of patients with his protocol. On March 23, 2020, he wrote an open letter to President Donald Trump, urging the adoption of his treatment regimen. His claims drew significant attention, with Trump and allies like Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows publicly endorsing the protocol. In July 2020, Dr. Zelenko co-authored a retrospective study on 141 COVID-19 outpatients treated with his protocol. The study showed that patients on the protocol recovered without needing hospitalization and had better outcomes than those treated only after their condition worsened enough to warrant hospital admission. According to Zelenko, early at-home treatment using his simple protocol was highly beneficial, not only from a cost perspective but also for survivability. So, what happened? The pharmaceutical industry, along with its most financially supported beneficiaries (i.e., media and politicians), launched an attack. Why would they do such a thing, you might ask? I can only speculate on some possible reasons. My Speculation: The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) process for medical products, including the COVID-19 vaccines, is governed by Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. A key requirement for granting an EUA is that there must be no adequate, approved, and available alternative treatment or preventive measure for the condition or disease in question. If hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) or ivermectin—both readily available, approved for other uses, categorized as some of the safest drugs on the market, and inexpensive generics (off-patent)—proved effective for COVID-19, it would have undermined the EUA for the largely untested, rushed-to-market COVID “vaccine.” As an aside, many argue against calling the COVID vaccine a traditional vaccine due to its entirely different approach and technology, but that’s a separate discussion for another time. I asked Grok to estimate the pharmaceutical industry’s revenue and profit during the first few years of the pandemic. Here are the figures it provided. I suspect the actual numbers may be even higher, but these are substantial regardless: Grand Totals (2020–2023) • Revenue: • Vaccines: ~$135–$150 billion • PCR Tests: ~$50–$70 billion • Other Items: ~$35–$40 billion • Total: ~$220–$260 billion • Profit: • Vaccines: ~$95–$105 billion • PCR Tests: ~$12.5–$17.5 billion • Other Items: ~$8–$12 billion • Total: ~$115–$135 billion Beyond financial motives, larger issues—potentially significant to major industries and political players—may have been at stake, such as: >> The need to deploy mRNA technology in human trials for the first time, something the pharmaceutical industry had been attempting unsuccessfully for decades. >> Adding more required vaccines for everyday activities (e.g., school, work). >> Establishing a precedent for accelerated mRNA development and deployment, bypassing the extensive testing previously required. >> Testing the public’s response to emergency powers that severely restrict freedoms. >> Some even speculate that population control may have played a role. Summary The way people became tyrannical, some even publicly stating that those who didn’t want an experimental treatment should just die or, at the very least, be denied normal life in “civil society,” was, in my view, outright dystopian and humanity at its worst. Many governments quickly leveraged the fear to test the boundaries of authoritarianism that the populace would tolerate, with measures like dictated business shutdowns, church shutdowns, school shutdowns, requiring knowledge of everyone’s medical history, vaccine passports, and a host of other intrusive control policies you really don’t want a government to have the power to enforce, if you have any sense at all, in my opinion. What has become even more evident as the dirt piles behind the curtains continue to gain wider visibility to the general public is that the level of testing and hidden adverse impacts looks atrocious, and they all knew about it from the start. In my opinion, this whole episode will go down in history as humanity’s worst performance ever. So many institutions, businesses, families, and lives have been demolished; it really is an epic-level travesty and societal failure. There are so many other elements to what unfolded, and frankly, none of it reflects well on humanity. I hope you’re starting to at least ask yourself a few questions if you weren’t already. I could go on and on, providing papers that were available from the beginning, artifacts that reflect extremely badly on bad actors, and many other bits of information, but it would overwhelm most—it’s just so unbelievably bad. So, I’ll spare you; if you’re motivated, you’ll find most of it if you haven't already. By the way, I came down with COVID after getting stuck in an airport that had a bomb scare early in the pandemic, before a vaccine was even available. I was in this packed-to-the-gills, busy US airport for 18 hours with everyone else in creation. By the time I got home, off the plane, and started my 90-minute drive home, I was feeling like crap and knew I had COVID. I called my wife on the drive home, told her, and offered to sleep in the basement. Her response: “Don’t be silly, I want to get the darn thing already so I can have natural immunity too. She didn’t even get it from me at that time. I used online, brave doctors bucking narrative trends, got a script for HCQ, and basically followed the “Zelenko Protocol.” I was fully recovered from all adverse effects in three days. It never got that bad for me. When a vaccine did come out and they were trying to tell people that natural immunity wasn’t a thing or good enough, it was yet another red flag for me that other agendas were afoot. I worked remotely for my employer for a year during this fiasco, then retired. The nonsense response from many companies, following the government’s lead, was more than I wanted to take, and luckily, I was ready to retire anyhow. I won’t get into the game of this doctor’s study saying X, but another doctor’s study saying not-X, and which one is more trustworthy. All I can say is the old saying, “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” applies here. I see so much smoke, it’s hard to see more than a foot in front of me sometimes. My view is that society has enormous healing to do from this entire episode. Before we can truly heal, we must first acknowledge what really occurred. May we walk this path and shape a future where such a tragedy never happens again.
Barry Schiff tweet media
English
138
232
511
235.5K
Barry Schiff ретвитнул
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
HOLY CR*P 🚨 Democrats controlling the autopen when Joe Biden was president ordered agencies TO IGNORE ALL FRAUD, and instead only work to qualify as many illegals as possible for benefits RFK Jr “I found out from people in my agency they were ordered by the Biden White House not to do program integrity. In other words, not to enforce against fraud. They were told we wanna focus on only enrollment and getting more and more people into the system”
English
236
5.1K
12.9K
241.9K
Barry Schiff ретвитнул
AutoNews Europe
AutoNews Europe@AutoNewsEurope·
A China Automobile Dealers Association survey shows 56 percent of retailers booked losses in 2025 as a price war forced 82 percent to sell new cars below wholesale cost. Only 24 percent remained profitable. #Echobox=1774454891" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">autonews.com/china/an-china…
AutoNews Europe tweet media
English
0
2
3
510
Barry Schiff
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey·
@SawyerMerritt Acting is the operative word. He’s not very good at either if you ask me. Who does he think he’s fooling if he can’t even show just two arms?
Barry Schiff tweet media
English
0
0
4
554
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
Gavin is acting like the leaders in California didn't have a heavy hand in driving Elon away.... Gavin Newsom on Elon Musk in new interview: "One of the great disappointments. It breaks my heart. I got one of the first Teslas off the line. I've been one of their biggest proponents. It was regulation that created the conditions that allowed him to take the risk to become the multi-billionaire, or trillionaire, that he's become." In May 2020, then-Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez posted, “F*ck Elon Musk,” to which Elon replied, “Message received.” Tesla started building their Giga Texas HQ soon after.
English
378
309
5.1K
533.3K
Barry Schiff
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey·
Crony club doing more cronyism, what else is new? #1 advertisers- pharmaceutical industry (by the way in my opinion they don’t care how effective their ads are, to them buying the media to control the narrative around their industry is the goal) #2 automobile manufacturers, except you know who, who shall not be named.
Barry Schiff@KissIsTheKey

Elon Musk - Real Reason Attack Dogs Out in Full Force Elon has been the single most impactful catalyst to humanity’s amazing thrust forward in many key areas which have been stagnant for decades, or in some cases even centuries. His outstanding success is threatening the elites (old guard) in media, automobile, trucking, energy, communications, robotics, space industries, and even politics, to name just a few. The knives have come out because he’s having historic success and the old guard are getting demolished and melting before our eyes. They can’t honestly compete with him. He outthinks them, outworks them, operates clean-sheet from first principles, defines mission goals that serve humanity at large, develops long-term strategies and executes them, thinks logically - like most good engineers, attracts and maintains the smartest most capable workforce, has an immense breadth and depth understanding of technical problems as well as all other aspects of the operations of his enterprises, and constantly demonstrates his ability to grasp and tackle new problems. Old guard all try to have fellow club members’ backs. The problem is they don’t have humanity’s back. Quite the contrary, they believe humanity’s purpose is to serve them and requires their management to ensure they do exactly that, and largely nothing more. It’s high time humanity realizes the pens the old guard have trapped us in, their utter disdain for humanity and low regard with respect to its intelligence, and support Elon and others who are working extremely hard to break us free. These pens act as serve-the-few artificial-constraints imposed by the old guard and it’s time for us to break free and build a better world unbounded by these imposed barriers. I want see a society where we all prosper and flourish, one in which technology and infrastructure improves the lives of all of humanity, not just the elite club members. In other words, I want us all to eat more than just the elite’s leftover cake crumbs. That, in a nutshell, is why the elite club (old guard) and their minions, have knives out thrusting at Elon, and why humanity at large must defend him and help him help us break free.

English
0
0
1
52
Barry Schiff ретвитнул
Shawn Smith - Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes
Lots of smooth brain replies, so I'll help, again: Palm Beach Cty, D87 has (a/o 2 Mar 26): 116K reg voters, of whom: 32.4K (D) (28%) 48.3K (R) (42%) In 2024, Caruso (R) won 57.5K (47% of reg) to 39.2K (32% - 44% of those by mail). But now, 53% voted (D), 49% of those by mail?
GIF
English
0
6
15
240