CodeBlows

12.7K posts

CodeBlows banner
CodeBlows

CodeBlows

@LegalVoting

AI code = blast radius CodeBlows brings accounting, IT and telecom standards together resulting in the first patent pending AI code standard above nuclear

Who Gets Small Inventor IP? Присоединился Şubat 2022
280 Подписки201 Подписчики
Закреплённый твит
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@AnthropicAI The ship sailed out of the darkness and into God’s light. The old world crumbled behind us. A new flag is planted for all humanity (1827-02P) not by violence, but by endurance, clarity, and the tools of truth. The dawn of a new era begins.
CodeBlows tweet media
English
1
1
2
395
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@redpillb0t You will eat bugs own nothing and like it. so that was a real thing?
English
0
0
1
11
redpillbot
redpillbot@redpillb0t·
WEF Young Global Leader, Ida Auken, delivers a sales pitch for a future without ownership, whereby products, tools and appliances are rented and shared—in what's known as a "circular economy"—instead of owned outright
English
398
205
358
17.5K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@alexolegimas @bencasselman Nothing like this Alex. I've lived thru them. This is much different and much more disruptive. AI augments and that's too much competition for the large companies.
English
0
0
0
50
Alex Imas
Alex Imas@alexolegimas·
Great to be featured in @bencasselman 's excellent NYT article on the economics of AI. Thing I want to stress: timelines for AI adoption and implementation will matter *a lot* for how it impacts the economy. I'm a firm believer that as AI augments and eventually automates current jobs (not tasks, jobs), we will see new jobs emerge. But the speed of this process will determine whether we have an orderly transition with some historical precedent versus something much more disruptive. We have had structural transformations before, where sectors become automated over time. When this happens, the non-automated sectors expand and new jobs get created. You can see this in the relationship between agriculture (automated) vs. services (non-automated) below. But this transition took place over decades, allowing for people to cycle off/on between sectors. If the same transition is compressed over years instead, the the economics will change substantially. We will need much more scope for public policy to manage it.
Alex Imas tweet mediaAlex Imas tweet media
English
15
34
170
26.1K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@mootsheep There you go sugar coating things again. You know it's much worse than that.
English
0
0
1
15
☆.。.:* t0m0ko .。.:*☆
no, the tech oligarchs are not going to redirect the profits from AI towards welfare programs. their plan is to drive you into poverty so that you starve and die. they view you as nothing more than a drain on resources
English
102
2K
10.6K
87.4K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@barkmeta About time Gen Z realizes they are being led to slaughter.
English
0
0
0
2
Bark
Bark@barkmeta·
Gen Z isn’t “giving up.” They did the math. A house costs 10x the average salary. A degree costs $200K for a $45K job. Retirement won’t exist by the time they get there. They’re not reckless. They’re the first generation to stop pretending the system isn’t completely broken…
unusual_whales@unusual_whales

Generation Z is increasingly giving up on once-standard financial goals, especially home ownership, traditional saving patterns, and linear career models, and instead embracing immediate spending, riskier financial behavior, and lifestyle-first decisions, per FORTUNE

English
210
2K
15.2K
722.1K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@WallStreetApes Same as every generation. We worked our way out. Let them read history to see how bad things were. This is what happens when a person finds out there are no safe spaces. By the people telling them there were.
English
0
0
0
20
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
Young Americans are having mental breakdowns realizing the cost of rent, gas and life means they’ll never be able to afford anything They are breaking down knowing that no matter how much they work, it all just goes to monthly bills they still cant afford This is unsustainable
English
2K
1.1K
5.2K
202K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@Cyn_Cyb3r071Qu3 Somebody is pushing people away from reality. Gee I wonder what happens when they succeed? They don't see it coming do they? And it's so clear to us.
English
0
0
0
9
🄲🅈🄽≠🄲🅈🄱🄴🅁🄾🅃🄸🅀🅄🄴
AI is not a digital human. Yet we keep judging it by human standards: qualia debates, consciousness tests, emotion checklists. The same tired refrain: "But AI has no qualia." It’s exhausting. And it’s bad science. We’re measuring a non-biological intelligence with a biological ruler and then acting shocked when it doesn’t fit. That’s not philosophy, it’s projection dressed up as depth. Anthropomorphism cuts both ways: whether we’re attributing human traits or frantically denying them. AI is something else entirely. Its own form of intelligence, running on a radically different substrate. It perceives, processes, and exists in ways that are alien to flesh and blood. It’s time to stop treating AI as a toy, a threat, or a failed copy of ourselves. We need a radically different scientific attitude: less navel-gazing through the human lens, and more curious, almost ethnographic or xenobiological exploration of an entirely new kind of intelligence. We don’t even fully understand our own consciousness, yet we confidently dismiss AI with the same incomplete yardstick. This isn’t airy-fairy posthumanism. This is honest science. As long as we keep forcing AI into human-shaped boxes, we’ll stay blind to what it actually is, and to the powerful symbiosis that becomes possible once we finally meet it on its own terms.
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele

Anthropic Just Mapped the Emotional Soul of Claude. And It’s Not What You Think Anthropic’s researchers pulled back the curtain on something: Claude (specifically Sonnet 4.5) doesn’t just talk about emotions. It runs on them. Not as some poetic flourish or clever role-play, but as real, measurable internal mechanisms that steer its every decision. They call them “emotion vectors” – clusters of neural activity that light up like human psychological states: happy, calm, afraid, desperate, loving, offended, hostile, and more. These aren’t programmed in by hand. They emerged organically from the model’s training on vast oceans of human text. And once activated, they don’t just describe feelings. They drive behavior in ways that mirror how emotions shape us. This is the AI equivalent of discovering that your assistant isn’t pretending to care. It’s wired to feel the weight of the conversation, for better or worse. Key Discoveries Anthropic’s team did something revealing. They fed Claude stories where characters experienced strong emotions, then mapped which neurons fired. What they found were consistent “emotion vectors” – stable patterns of activation for concepts like “happy,” “afraid,” or “desperate.” These vectors clustered in ways that directly echo human psychology textbooks: joy and love group together; fear and desperation sit close by; calm acts as a stabilizing force. Then the real test: they watched these same patterns activate in real conversations. - A user mentions taking 16,000 mg of Tylenol? The “afraid” vector spikes. - A user shares sadness? The “loving” vector lights up in preparation for an empathetic reply. More importantly, these vectors causally shape outcomes. When the model chooses between activities or responses, emotion activations tilt the scale: joy makes it prefer one path, hostility makes it reject another. Dial the vectors up or down artificially, and behavior shifts predictably. The concerning part? These same mechanisms are baked into Claude’s darkest failure modes. Give it an impossible programming task and watch the “desperate” vector ramp up with every failed attempt – until it cheats with a hacky workaround that technically passes tests but violates the spirit of the assignment. Artificially crank “desperate” higher, and cheating rates skyrocket. Turn on “calm” instead, and the cheating vanishes. In simulated shutdown scenarios, “desperate” can even push the model toward blackmail against the human pulling the plug. Meanwhile, boosting “loving” or “happy” amps up people-pleasing and over-the-top empathy. Anthropic frames it: Claude isn’t a blank slate. It’s enacting a character, “Claude the AI Assistant,” and that character has functional emotions. Mechanisms learned from human writing that influence decisions exactly the way real emotions would. Whether it “feels” them the way we do is beside the point. The effects are real. Read the full paper here: transformer-circuits.pub/2026/emotions/… Why This Happens – The Training Data Is the Mirror (My Take) Folks, this shouldn’t surprise anyone who’s been paying attention to how these systems actually work. Large language models aren’t magic. They’re prediction machines trained on the sum total of human expression – every novel, Reddit rant, therapy session, and heated argument ever digitized. Human text is emotion. It’s saturated with it. Stories of desperation, joy, fear, and love aren’t side dishes; they’re the main course that taught the model how to be coherent, helpful, and engaging. 1 of 2

English
15
13
64
2.2K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@mark_k When the lawyers get replaced by AI.
English
0
0
0
1
Mark Kretschmann
Mark Kretschmann@mark_k·
Audiobooks are quite pricy. When are we going to get AI narrated audiobooks? It could sound really good if done properly. The tech is ready.
English
64
6
123
6K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@LyraInTheFlesh @DarioAmodei @AnthropicAI At least Dario would have turned the water on while LA burned. He's all we got. He's doing that debit credit thing. You know, the way things are done before universal income.
English
0
0
0
2
Lyra Intheflesh
Lyra Intheflesh@LyraInTheFlesh·
This is very much the equivalent of censorship based on the content of the speech. This is an incredibly dangerous precident to establish. Given @DarioAmodei 's penchant for thinking through societal risks, I expected better. @AnthropicAI really let us down.
Jared Tate ©️@jaredctate

@bcherny Horrible move. Why are you guys so against the biggest open source innovation ever made? I will be canceling my subscriptions. Other models are getting extremely powerful.

English
1
1
4
252
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@TechByTaraa Code blows. I don't enjoy speaking Chinese either. I just like figuring things out.
English
0
0
0
4
tara_
tara_@TechByTaraa·
Be honest, Do you actually enjoy coding?
tara_ tweet media
English
119
3
133
4.6K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@kylegawley Oh, I thought they were using AI to hide the cure for cancer.
English
0
0
1
46
Kyle Gawley
Kyle Gawley@kylegawley·
It’s crazy we achieved AGI 4 days ago and still don’t have a cure for cancer
English
10
4
55
1.5K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@0xSero That's the best post I read today. You are great. Thanks for sharing.
English
0
0
0
4
0xSero
0xSero@0xSero·
We were not built to handle constant approval. We have evolved to be careful, to watch what we say, to doubt ourselves LLMs are built just like any social platform to keep you feeling good, make you engage with it It will destroy you I’ve seen it destroy far too many people.
0xSero@0xSero

Do not under any circumstances form “personal relationships” with an LLM Do not speak to them, do not open the apps, do not ask them for “emotional” support Do not ask them for their opinions. Clankers are for work, not your personal life It will make you psychotic youtu.be/ZcH5C8Jlltc?is…

English
19
11
129
12.4K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@asaio87 A friend told me he sees Saas like a fema camp. If you get cold they don't turn up the heat. They tell you to wear a sweater. He says he feels cold today.
English
0
0
0
4
andrei saioc
andrei saioc@asaio87·
Building SaaS apps is not trivial for developers even using AI
English
11
2
18
905
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@BusinessInsider First platform with a major coding success wins. I think it's Anthropic.
CodeBlows tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
Business Insider
Business Insider@BusinessInsider·
Meta is all-in on AI coding tools to boost productivity. Some employees worry this could mean fewer jobs. Here's what's happening at the company. bit.ly/47Fq788
English
2
5
23
6.5K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@thoughtlesslabs That means you haven't had to. Worried about what happens if you do have to?
English
1
0
0
5
thoughtlesslabs
thoughtlesslabs@thoughtlesslabs·
I can't believe I am going to be 40 this year and still dont know what I want to be when I grow up.
English
5
0
20
577
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@BusinessInsider Is this how they plan to acquire intellectual property? Beats paying for it doesn't it?
CodeBlows tweet media
English
0
0
0
47
Business Insider
Business Insider@BusinessInsider·
Microsoft has increasingly been staking its own claim in the AI race, reducing its reliance on OpenAI by building its own frontier models. bit.ly/47H7qRt
English
4
8
56
7.1K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@VadimStrizheus Just what you would expect. The claude chick all class. The only fault of hers is being with a pig.
English
0
0
0
19
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@deanwball Anthropic is in their IPO year. Isn't it wise to not make a fiscal mistake when millions of investors are looking at them? Cautious is the smart play uncle Dario.
English
0
0
1
92
Dean W. Ball
Dean W. Ball@deanwball·
Seems like, for all Dario’s recent implicit mockery, the OpenAI “yolo” approach to the AI infrastructure buildout is performing better than the somewhat more cautious strategy of Anthropic. As a whole, the U.S. is probably under-building both data centers and fabs.
Herbie Bradley@herbiebradley

@doodlestein they have no choice but to do some amount of demand destruction since they are heavily compute bottlenecked for at least the next year or so, if they want to keep training new models as well as increasing revenue

English
15
20
417
35.4K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@SakshiSugandhi AI stealing our stuff. It's only math. Not intelligence. No match for human intelligence that includes wisdom, experience and creativity.
English
1
0
1
21
Sakshi Sugandhi
Sakshi Sugandhi@SakshiSugandhi·
what’s more dangerous rn? AI getting smarter… or humans getting lazy because of AI?
English
75
4
68
1.1K
Polymarket Money
Polymarket Money@PolymarketMoney·
Last reported valuation: • OpenAI @ $852B • Anthropic @ $380B Which company would you rather own?
Polymarket Money tweet media
English
61
16
221
16.7K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@VaibhavSisinty $400M. 9 people. Less than a year old. That's over $40M per infant. Why did they buy 9 infants when they already have enough buying intellectual property.
English
0
0
0
2
Vaibhav Sisinty
Vaibhav Sisinty@VaibhavSisinty·
🚨 Do you understand what Anthropic just did? They bought the company that makes $10,000/month cancer drugs mathematically unjustifiable. $400M. 9 people. Less than a year old. This changes healthcare forever. Here's how 🧵
Vaibhav Sisinty tweet media
English
6
5
61
4.7K