MathsonArt (❖,❖)

9.9K posts

MathsonArt (❖,❖) banner
MathsonArt (❖,❖)

MathsonArt (❖,❖)

@MathsonArt

🎨 Digital & Illustrator Artist 👩‍🎨 @ritualnet ❖ Contributor MOD @pharos_network |Prev @Somnia_Network magnitude 6 @SeismicSys @RialoHQ

ABD Присоединился Mayıs 2023
502 Подписки2.4K Подписчики
MathsonArt (❖,❖)
MathsonArt (❖,❖)@MathsonArt·
@pusholder Ne saçma ülke mk hepsi milyon Euro kazanıyor zaten gidin fakir fukaraya yardım edin.
Türkçe
0
0
0
74
Pusholder
Pusholder@pusholder·
İbrahim Hacıosmanoğlu: "Milli Takım oyuncularına Bodrum’dan kaç adet villa verileceğini Hakan Çalhanoğlu belirleyecek."
Pusholder tweet mediaPusholder tweet media
Türkçe
773
86
11.5K
1.9M
Pharos | Testnet Live
Pharos | Testnet Live@pharos_network·
🇫🇷 #EthCC is officially underway! Come visit the Pharos booth on the 4th floor, Ruby Gallery at the Palais des Festivals.
Pharos | Testnet Live tweet media
English
69
113
498
10.5K
cryptolaps
cryptolaps@cryptolaps_·
Bugün “crypto neobank” diye sunulanların büyük çoğunluğu aslında finansal altyapıyı yeniden yazmıyor, sadece mevcut sistemin üstüne bir UI katmanı ekliyor. Kart, yield ve wallet entegrasyonu ile bir şeyler “çalışıyor gibi” görünüyor ama gerçek finansal hayatın geçtiği katman yani ödeme altyapısı, uyumluluk ve veri bütünlüğü hala eski sistemlere bağımlı. Asıl problem burada başlıyor. Bankaların stablecoin’e direnmesi irrasyonel değil. Çünkü onların dünyasında temel gerçek şu: görünürlük yoksa kontrol yok, kontrol yoksa risk vardır. Stablecoin’ler bugüne kadar bankaların anlayabileceği ve denetleyebileceği bir formatta sunulmadı. Bu yüzden reddedildiler. @SeismicSys'in yaklaşımı tam olarak bu noktada devreye giriyor. Seismic, stablecoin’i sadece bir varlık olarak değil, uyumlu ve denetlenebilir bir finansal akış (compliant financial flow) olarak ele alır. Yani mesele “blockchain mi bankacılık mı” değil, bu ikisini aynı güven modelinde buluşturabilmek. Bunun için üç kritik şey sağlar: Programmable compliance: İşlemler gerçekleşmeden önce kurallar çalışır Selective privacy: Veri herkese açık değildir ama gerektiğinde denetlenebilir Deterministic execution: Tüm taraflar aynı sonucu görür, belirsizlik yoktur Bu kombinasyon bankaların en büyük korkusunu ortadan kaldırır: “Bu para nereden geldi ve nereye gidiyor?” sorusunun cevapsız kalması @brookwellapp gibi yaklaşımlar önemli çünkü doğru soruyu soruyorlar: “Bu ürün gerçekten banka hesabının yerini alabiliyor mu?” Ama bu sorunun cevabı yalnızca UX veya ürün mimarisiyle verilemez. Bu, altyapı problemidir. Eğer altyapı: Bankaların anlayacağı şekilde şeffaf değilse Regülasyonla uyumlu değilse Geleneksel finans sistemleriyle doğal şekilde entegre olamıyorsa o zaman ne kadar iyi tasarlanmış olursa olsun, o ürün asla primary account olamaz. Seismic perspektifinden bakınca gelecek çok net: Yeni nesil neobank’ler “crypto + bank” birleşimi olmayacak doğrudan regülasyon-native, privacy-aware ve programlanabilir finans sistemleri olacak Kart, yield veya wallet rekabeti önemsizleşecek Çünkü gerçek rekabet şu olacak: Kim kullanıcıya tek bir hesapla hem Web2 hem Web3 finansal hayatını eksiksiz yaşatabiliyor? Bu sorunun cevabı UX’te değil altyapının kendisinde yazıyor. Ve o altyapı yeniden inşa ediliyor. @xealistt @NoxxW3 @heathcliff_eth
cryptolaps tweet media
Ravi Riley@ravi_riley

x.com/i/article/2036…

Türkçe
4
0
11
138
MathsonArt (❖,❖)
MathsonArt (❖,❖)@MathsonArt·
Gm 🌤️ DeFi has evolved quickly, but its architecture remains fragile. Today’s systems rely on a mix of on-chain logic and off-chain coordination (oracles, middleware, snapshots), which operate asynchronously. This creates a key issue: lack of synchronization. Even small delays can cause: Price and time mismatches Incomplete data triggering mechanisms Inconsistent system states In DeFi, these edge cases can have major consequences. Core Problem Modern DeFi systems are not truly synchronized. Rialo’s Approach Rialo solves this at the foundation: Native HTTP connectivity: reduces reliance on oracles and middleware Atomic state updates: price and time update together Built-in synchronization: system consistency is enforced by design Why It Matters Traditional systems add more layers to improve safety → more layers = more failure points Rialo removes complexity instead. Bottom Line Rialo enables: Deterministic behavior Atomic guarantees Protocol level synchronization By eliminating an entire class of risks before they can occur. @RialoHQ
MathsonArt (❖,❖) tweet media
English
11
8
30
1.1K
MathsonArt (❖,❖)
MathsonArt (❖,❖)@MathsonArt·
Gn 🔮 @ritualnet the model was upgraded to v1.2; a canary rollout was opened and contracts were pinned to the artifact hash if outputs drift, the system can automatically revert to the last stable version via an on chain switch.
MathsonArt (❖,❖) tweet media
English
13
5
26
946
Murat (❖,❖)
Murat (❖,❖)@murataydn_34·
Everyone talks about AI. No one talks about verifying it. That’s the real problem. @ritualnet
Murat (❖,❖) tweet media
English
22
0
47
772
Grimm
Grimm@Gr1mmJ4w·
when was the last time you typed something into chatgpt that you couldn't google because you were too embarrassed? or that legal situation you didn't want to bother anyone with? or your financial position, scared of who might see it? (we already know some exchanges used that data to trade against us btw, but let's not go there lol) or... actually nvm... we're in public... you know what i mean... you did. i did. everyone did. problem is that prompt is sitting somewhere. on openai's servers, in anthropic's logs, in whatever data center owns that moment. you had those "this feels weirdly personal" moments with it, then immediately went "wait what am i doing" but inference the actual moment AI generates a response for you happened entirely on centralized infrastructure. Ritual is trying to break that. how? they built something called Cascade. uses token sharding to split your prompt across different nodes. no single node sees the full picture. inference runs distributed. not cryptographic, statistical privacy. meaning not "mathematically impossible to crack" but "breaking it would take longer than the age of the universe" level security. cryptographic alternatives like SMPC exist but a single forward pass on Llama-2-7B takes 5 minutes. not usable in production Cascade does the same thing in seconds... if you go looking for Cascade in ritual's docs, you won't find it. because it's not there yet. this isn't a feature, it's a research output. there's an arXiv paper, an ICML 2025 submission, a blog post but no production implementation yet. so what we're talking about right now isn't "how does this work" but "where does this go." and that distinction matters. most projects do it backwards... ship the docs first, research later. Ritual is doing the research first. the trajectory of AI infrastructure: ・ models went open source ✓ ・ weights became downloadable ✓ ・ inference is still centralized Ritual wants to break that last link stop thinking about how much you trust AI, start thinking about how much access AI has to you or don't... keep being the main character king... the world could have thousands of someone as valuable as you, enjoy it lmao @ritualnet
Grimm tweet media
English
9
0
52
10.7K
MathsonArt (❖,❖) ретвитнул
Noxx
Noxx@NoxxW3·
Why I’m very bullish on Seismic >Neobanks are growing rapidly and becoming more widespread, with their importance increasing day by day. Seismic provides the privacy infrastructure that neobanks need, positioning itself as a critical part of this evolving ecosystem
English
132
138
435
16.2K
MathsonArt (❖,❖) ретвитнул
Xealist
Xealist@xealistt·
If neobanks have a home chain, it’s Seismic. And we’re building it together.
English
71
87
303
10.2K
Eric
Eric@ericgudboy·
GM Legends In Web3, flexibility is alpha Adapt or exit
Eric tweet media
English
69
0
117
1K
Grimm
Grimm@Gr1mmJ4w·
when you look at what lyron is building, these words make a lot more sense Seismic is a confidential EVM chain. transactions are encrypted by default. no one sees your balances, your counterparties, your positions, not even the validator this is what banks actually fear. not stablecoins. not yield competition... it's the moment where financial privacy becomes a protocol guarantee... not a corporate policy, not a compliance checkbox, not a "trust us" CLARITY act can ban yield on stablecoins. can't ban math code > legislation. always has been
Grimm tweet media
Lyron@lyronctk

i'm 0% worried about this "oh no I'm a stablecoin company. i'm more efficient than banks bc I don't have branch networks, middle office bloat, or COBOL infra. I have no way to pass all this excess margin back to users" not a CHANCE. cash back, stock rewards, travel perks, a million options anti-competitive legislation can only work for so long. these banks are toast. can't stop the tide

English
7
0
56
392
MathsonArt (❖,❖)
MathsonArt (❖,❖)@MathsonArt·
@RialoHQ Strong takeDeFi can’t scale by recycling the same capital, and sub-5% yields make that clear. Moving toward onchain private credit and real-world cash flows is the shift needed, and Rialo could be a key bridge.
English
0
1
6
413
Rialo
Rialo@RialoHQ·
The current system of DeFi is reaching its limit. When 93% of stablecoins earn under 5%, it’s a sign that our system is simply recycling the same speculative capital. To scale to trillions, we have to move beyond the echo chamber. We are investing in the shift from crypto-native leverage to onchain private credit. By connecting stablecoins to real-world economic activity we are replacing volatile "yield farming" with sustainable, spread-based returns. DeFi is finally growing up and Rialo will be the bridge to bring in new building blocks.
Udit Bhansali@PoppyPancho

x.com/i/article/2027…

English
82
63
294
18.4K