Закреплённый твит
Prof. Yuille
9K posts

Prof. Yuille
@ProfYuille
Praxivist. Thinks. Legal/Political/Economic Agnostic.
Присоединился Mart 2014
816 Подписки1.9K Подписчики

@ProfRobAnderson Big law neither wants nor needs “practice ready” grads. People with lots of practice skills aren’t appreciably more successful. And the business model relies on a hoard of juniors who don’t plan to make partner but want training. The in-house ecosystem also relies on this set up.
English

@brianlfrye I do a thought experiment re this and it never fails. In a group of 100 the most I’ve EVER had is 2 people who renounce ownership over things they own.
English

As usual, everyone believes in the legitimacy of the kind of property they want to own. jurist.org/commentary/202…
English

@Erika_K_Wilson Varies by jurisdiction but where signing is expected, individuals are free to decline to sign. They do risk arrest in that case but they shouldn’t be risking death. Using a strategy that is ignorant, wrong, or stupid isn’t enough to justify death. Tired of folks saying it is.
English

@brianlfrye @dickens432 My point was just that this is not a straight forward thing. But I also think *many* law professors—especially those that have been rewarded by it—are very invested in the system, even while engaging in socially de rigueur bashing/angsting.
English

@ProfYuille @dickens432 But really, this is a market that we literally collectively control. Yes, it’s hard for untenured professors to make change, but tenured professors have no obligation to play ball. If we can’t solve market failures in legal scholarship, which ones can we solve?
English

I see comments like this and—while I appreciate the sentiment—it gives real knows-little-to-nothing-about-the-relationship-between-universities-and their-constituent-schools energy. Law professors cannot just up and decide to solve this problem.
Benjamin Fischer@dickens432
I see a fair amount of law professors tweeting about the most recent Harvard Law Review contretemps. However, law professors could solve such problems by not relying on publication in student law reviews as evidence for tenure, and instead solve the problem themselves.
English

@dickens432 If you wanted this to happen by fiat, you’d need to lobby the ABA, not law professors. If the accreditor made the change, universities would have to accept it. But peer review is also rife with problems. Not clear it’s the best place to put ABA lobby energy.
English

@ProfYuille Being possible, that is. But you make a very valuable point.
English

@dickens432 Well, except at stand alone law schools, the central university makes the final determination on tenure. Most law schools don’t have enough capital to jettison the system they had to fight to get accepted to replace it with essentially nothing. Same on hiring.
English

@ProfYuille Why not? Any law school could announce that they will give no weight to where a law review article is published, and will only look to the contents; disband their own law review; or found their own law review run by their faculty.
English

@MaybellRomero I have this feeling about people from a lot of places. Perhaps the people of greater Los Angeles could show more attention to other places. But waaaay too many people make hating LA part of their geographic identity.
English

Why are capitalism’s apologists so dead set on assuring everyone some problem would still exist under some other order? Like… this is not the dunk you think it is.
Julian Sanchez@normative
And then you get out of your teens and realize what you’d been optimistically attributing to “capitalism” are ubiquitous human pathologies, mostly even worse under other economic orders.
English


