
Cindy Simpson
31.4K posts

Cindy Simpson
@Simpsonreport
Thankful. Conservative, Christian, CPA, Entrepreneur, Mainstream Media Skeptic. Essays at American Thinker, Am Greatness, Am Spectator, RedState. #BeABarnabas




@BillMelugin_ @monnakll CBP One App was rolled out in Oct of 2020. So Trump created the app.



A federal judge with a record of ruling against President Trump blocked his admin from terminating the parole of immigrants who entered the United States using the Biden administration’s app, writes @FredLucasWH dailysignal.com/2026/03/31/oba…

Remarkable. The Biden administration created out of thin air a pathway on a cell phone app for roughly 900,000 migrants from around the world to bypass the Rio Grande and enter the U.S. at ports of entry. Trump revoked their legal status on day one. A federal judge now says no.






Professor @RandyEBarnett , one of the most influential Originalists of all time, has written an article in the @WSJ explaining that President Trump is right on Birthright Citizenship. He is one of the leading libertarian law professors. Originalists agree on this issue.


This Politico article from @joshgerstein is a perfect example of ideological propaganda masquering as reporting. The entire point is to never engage with the historical, constitutional, or practical merits of the birthright citizenship debate. It can't, because the position "every anchor baby born to a tourist or illegal immigrant is a citizen for life" is ridiculous. So instead, Gerstein just uses scare words and smears a lawyer who helped popularize the Trump Administration's position, even though he doesn't currently work for the Admin and didn't write any of its briefs for the case. The view is "fringe" and "radical" and used to be "obscure" and violates centuries of precedent (we all know how much the left cares about centuries of precedent!). Of course, given it's embraced by the president of the United States and most of the Republican Party, the view opposing unlimited birthright citizenship is definitionally not "fringe." And as Gerstein knows (but avoids admitting), the Wong Kim Ark case only concerned the citizenship of a man born to two lawful permanent residents of the United States -- the reasoning there clearly does not extend to illegal residents, travelers, and the like, and the Supreme Court has never ruled on this. Gerstein has to use these sorts of deflections, because the position of birthright citizenship maximalists is obviously insane. It is ridiculous that the Biden Administration can mint millions of citizens by intentionally flooding the country with illegal foreigners. It is ridiculous that Chinese citizens can land in Saipan for a few days, get a C-section, and have a child eligible for a lifetime of benefits funded by U.S. taxpayers. It is manifestly insane that CCP-aligned Chinese oligarchs can purchase dozens of surrogate children and whisk them back to China upon birth, safe in the knowledge that they have irrevocable U.S. citizenship. All of this is why a sane reading of the 14th Amendment must be restored immediately -- and it's why Politico has to resort to shoddy articles like this one.









One of the biggest problems in society today is that we no longer share a common set of basic facts. Without that, you cannot have a healthy discourse, or really any discourse at all. Too many people either do not know basic facts or have been led to believe things that simply are not true. In real life, almost no one knows that the Russia collusion plot was cooked up by the Clinton campaign, or that there is a transcript proving Flynn did not lie, or that the Ukraine impeachment scam began the morning after Mueller’s train wreck testimony because they needed a new hoax, or that Fauci demonstrably sent money and technology to the Wuhan lab for them to create deadly coronaviruses. The list goes on and on. And yet, in polite society, you are still treated like a crank for knowing these things rather than repeating the approved version of events. That is a very big problem. So until there is at least some agreement on basic, provable facts, there is no real point in debating anything. If the inputs are garbage, the outputs will be too.

@glukianoff The easiest gig in the world is getting some federal judge to enjoin an action taken by the Trump Administration. It doesn’t even matter what the action is.

Hello Senator Thune, Let's expose what you're really doing with "reconciliation." You announced it yesterday, eleven months after the House passed the SAVE America Act. You're not trying to pass this bill. You're trying to kill it in a way you can blame on process. Here's how we know: Reconciliation requires the Senate parliamentarian to rule that provisions are "budgetary." Citizenship verification is not budgetary. Photo ID mandates are not budgetary. The parliamentarian will gut the bill. Then you'll shrug and say "we tried." We see through you. Meanwhile, you WON'T use the tools that actually work: Rule XIX limits each senator to two speeches per legislative day. Keep the Senate in continuous session, file cloture daily, and the filibuster exhausts in ~12-20 days. You dismissed it as "complicated." Because if you tried and succeeded, you'd have to actually pass the bill. Harry Reid nuked the filibuster in 2013 when he wanted results. Mitch McConnell changed Senate rules THREE times and canceled the August recess. Chuck Schumer used reconciliation within months on a 50-50 Senate. You have 53 seats. You've changed nothing, canceled nothing, and waited eleven months. Now let's talk donors: • Goldman Sachs: $150K to you - top H-1B user • Google: $75K - lobbies against E-Verify • Meta: $72.5K - Zuckerberg's FWD[.]us pushes mass immigration • Wells Fargo: $90K - banks undocumented immigrants Same corporations sponsor Punchbowl News, where you sit for "Fly Out Days" which nobody watches except Congress staffers and K Street lobbyists who pays premium bucks for legislative intelligence. Their reporter then telegraphs to the audience the SAVE Act "will ultimately fail." Corporate money flows to you AND to the outlet that frames your inaction as inevitable. We see the loop. You called grassroots anger a "paid influencer ecosystem." YOU are the paid influencer. You take the wrong side of a 80% issue because you are indistinguishable from a K Street mouthpiece, and an ineffective one to boot who won't bend the rules to get anything passed. What we want: 1. Force a real talking filibuster. 2. Stop hiding behind process. 3. Pass the SAVE America Act. YOU will become the reason that we will have our butts kicked in midterms. Not Candace Owens, not Nick Fuentes, not anyone else. You and you alone, and all because you want to make the 200 or so viewers of Punchbowl Fly Out Days happy. You're living in a K Street information bubble, addicted to the comforts and praises of lobbyists masquerading as journalists. You mistake the steak and martini dinners you get invited to as your own constituents. You are not "moderate." The SAVE America Act has 98% support among Republicans. Name one other thing that has 98% support. You are an extreme minority who prides himself on being a calm leader, when in reality you are well in the running for the most ineffective Majority leader of all time. Prove me wrong. Do the bare modicum of effort. Not symbolic. Actual effort. Cancel the recess. Get SAVE America Act passed.



