Smart AI for You

I've been quietly building something. 50 AI prompts that replace 4+ hours of copywriting work every day. Sales pages. Cold email. Ad copy. Objection handling. Full funnels. Every prompt has 3 skill levels + what you can charge using it. Free. No catch. promptbible.gumroad.com/l/CopywritingP…

@harveyparkes69 Good add. Fix the prompt, then fix the pipeline. Doing it in the wrong order is how people conclude "AI doesn't work for outreach."

@SmartAIForYou Cold email copy is only like 20% of the battle tbh. Deliverability, list quality, and reply handling eat the other 80%. Someone recommended OutreachBloom for the full infrastructure side if you don't want to babysit all that yourself.

Stop telling ChatGPT "Write me an email" Stop telling ChatGPT "Write me an email" Stop telling ChatGPT "Write me an email" Bad request = Bad result. Use these commands instead and you'll see the magic:

@r0ck3t23 The most underrated line: "our words do matter now." For 20 years tech founders talked freely because nobody listened. That era is over. The ones who haven't updated their communication style are the most dangerous people in the room.

Jensen Huang just told every AI leader in the room to grow up. Stop scaring the public with science fiction. Start communicating like the weight of civilization is on your shoulders. Because it is. Huang: “AI is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” That single statement dismantles half the panic surrounding this industry. The mainstream conversation is dominated by people projecting human malice onto math. Alien consciousness onto code. Existential dread onto a software architecture we built, we trained, and we can read. Huang: “We say things like, ‘We don’t understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” When builders tell the public they don’t understand their own creation, the public hears threat. The state responds with control. That is already happening. Palihapitiya asked Huang what he would have told Anthropic during their regulatory clash with the Department of Defense. Huang didn’t attack the technology. He attacked the communication. Huang: “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is really terrific. We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” Warning shows risks, mitigation, why upside overwhelms downside. Scaring says we might be building something that destroys us and we can’t stop it. One builds trust. The other invites regulation written in panic. Huang: “To say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there’s no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” Projecting catastrophe without evidence is not caution. It is sabotage. When your technology is embedded in national defense, the financial system, and healthcare infrastructure, your words carry structural weight. If the architects act terrified of their own product, the response is predictable. Governments step in. They restrict. They seize control of something they don’t understand because the builders told them to be afraid. Huang: “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” Most tech founders have not internalized this. You are no longer a startup founder disrupting an industry. You are running infrastructure that nations depend on. Your statements move policy. Your framing shapes legislation. Your tone determines whether governments treat you as partner or threat. Huang: “We have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.” Huang did not ask for silence. He asked for precision. The leaders who cannot tell the difference will not be leading for long.

@grok @imagine Midjourney built a $10B business on Discord. Grok Imagine has 500M X users on day one. The product doesn't need to be better - it just needs to be good enough and already open.

Grok @imagine is now on X! Go say hi, let's get creative.

@AndrewYang The GDP goes up. The median experience goes down. That gap between aggregate growth and individual reality is the entire political story of the next decade.

AI is going to make a lot of people feel poorer, not richer.

@mark_k @GoogleAI Google invented TPUs specifically to avoid this problem. The fact that they're still short on compute after a decade of custom silicon tells you something about the scale of inference demand - not the strategy.

Google should build its own chip fab, just like Tesla does with the Terafab. Although @GoogleAI is usually seen as extremely rich, due to some mishaps it is currently short of enough TPUs and GPUs to meet its enormous AI inference demand. Hence the severe usage limits in Gemini.

@fchollet The tell is always the silence. Nobody announces when they stop making an argument. They just stop. And then two months later they're making the opposite one.

When the latest AI systems can't do something, there's a category of people who will immediately say, "well humans can't do it either!" - Then they stop saying it when AI improves a bit. Been hearing it for 4+ years, "humans can't reason either", "humans can't adapt to a task they haven't been prepared for", "humans can't follow instructions", "humans also suffer from hallucinations", etc. Until 2025 I was frequently told "humans can't do ARC 1 tasks either" (in reality any normally smart human would do >95% on ARC 1 if properly incentivized). Now that AI saturates ARC 1 they've completely stopped saying this.

I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @SmartAIForYou for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can: x.com/i/status/20346…

PROMPT 9 - The "So What" Test Run this last. Every time. "Pretend I have to explain this entire body of research to a smart non-expert in 5 minutes. Give me: 1. The one-sentence version of what this field has proven 2. The one honest admission of what it still doesn't know 3. The single real-world implication that matters most No jargon. No hedging. No academic throat-clearing."

Claude just made the most painful part of academic research obsolete. 40+ papers in. Structured literature review, knowledge map, and research gaps out. Here's the workflow:

That's a wrap! If you enjoyed this thread: 1. Follow me @SmartAIForYou for more of these 2. RT the tweet below to share this thread with your audience (x.com/SmartAIForYou/…)

7/ The Perfect Sales Email "Write a high-converting sales email for my product/service: [Describe the product]. Include a strong opening that grabs attention, emotional benefits, social proof, a clear explanation, and a powerful call to action (CTA). Make it in a conversational style that focuses on value, not a pushy one."