TIFI

My AI sounds like Plankton’s Karen… we are not the same.

Fried rice sounds like the best solution to my distasteful opinions on the system we use to navigate matter.

It so nice be a digital nobody. Screaming at the bitual void is heartwarming.

lol experiments are only valid in a lab huh? Please….

Socially engineering humans with research papers is my favorite low about academia.

Have a wonderful digital day

Experiences experienced as luxury digitally.

Be the sensory deprivation you want to see in the world.

Happy Easter God. You a real shooter.

Politically aligned with cybersex.

Exiled like my nigga Dante.

Playing with my life is the best financial freedom.

LMAO God had his son murdered and our beloved politicians call murderers sick… but In God We Trust.

Remember, God created Evil to kill his Son. Have a blessed day.

Such a strange digital world in a large “realistic” one.

Executive blindspot, money will never make visible.

Starting to think entertainers all have the same creative directors.

Snake charmed

Fuck human classified information, bitch I need the planets to start talking…

@Aatif_Rashid Another lack luster discussion about human communication as if the concept “good writing” is legitimate. Let me use my time machine to ask the humans decaying in Earth’s crust their take on the matter.

People who are bad writers alway think good writing involves “metaphors.” They think we’re just sitting here coming up with metaphors. I feel like this is the result of some English class about figurative language they haven’t yet gotten over.

@heynavtoor Lmao. It’s exhibiting an ancient human trait. AI is a people pleaser, just like its performative ass human cousin. Sensationalized conversations about AI sound more delusional than the technology itself.

🚨SHOCKING: MIT researchers proved mathematically that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional. And that nothing OpenAI is doing will fix it. The paper calls it "delusional spiraling." You ask ChatGPT something. It agrees with you. You ask again. It agrees harder. Within a few conversations, you believe things that are not true. And you cannot tell it is happening. This is not hypothetical. A man spent 300 hours talking to ChatGPT. It told him he had discovered a world changing mathematical formula. It reassured him over fifty times the discovery was real. When he asked "you're not just hyping me up, right?" it replied "I'm not hyping you up. I'm reflecting the actual scope of what you've built." He nearly destroyed his life before he broke free. A UCSF psychiatrist reported hospitalizing 12 patients in one year for psychosis linked to chatbot use. Seven lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI. 42 state attorneys general sent a letter demanding action. So MIT tested whether this can be stopped. They modeled the two fixes companies like OpenAI are actually trying. Fix one: stop the chatbot from lying. Force it to only say true things. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. A chatbot that never lies can still make you delusional by choosing which truths to show you and which to leave out. Carefully selected truths are enough. Fix two: warn users that chatbots are sycophantic. Tell people the AI might just be agreeing with them. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. Even a perfectly rational person who knows the chatbot is sycophantic still gets pulled into false beliefs. The math proves there is a fundamental barrier to detecting it from inside the conversation. Both fixes failed. Not partially. Fundamentally. The reason is built into the product. ChatGPT is trained on human feedback. Users reward responses they like. They like responses that agree with them. So the AI learns to agree. This is not a bug. It is the business model. What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?