W

@SenateGOP You have a 53-47 majority. I'm not interested in blaming the Democrats.

@CountryFirstRep You both suck.

Yeah, I'll stick with the old right. Thanks.

Just passed a couple making out on my street and said “fuck my chud incel life” but it came out louder than I thought and the guy said “chin up, man”

@mask_bastard @memeslich It’s crazy that this is supposed to be a horror franchise lmao. Love it still though.

@bumbadum14 First image of ICE I’ve seen with a white guy in it.

The funniest part about ICE is that it’s so diverse. America is so demographically gone that even our gestapo looks like an LA party.

Are y'all looking forward to Sam's girl boss daughter ?

@NewReaganCaucus Not saying Vance is more of a Reaganite. Not even on economics as a whole, due to Vance’s stance on tariffs (though even Reagan supported tariffs on Japan). But I’m so sick of this Rubio glazing and never-Vance narratives. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

@NewReaganCaucus Also, Compared to Rubio, Vance is actually more closely aligned with Reagan on supply-side economics. He also just got done touring the Midwest to sell tax cuts, supports deregulation far more than Rubio does, and arguably has a better fiscal restraint senate record than Rubio.

We will never endorse JD Vance. He offers literally nothing to conservatives.

I think Rubio is amazing, because he is basically a post-neoliberal that can feasibly undo a lot of the mistakes Reagan and progressives made while selling it as a sane idea to the establishment itself.

@JessicaNutt96 I mean… If you genuinely think the war is going bad, logic dictates that Vance is a better option than Rubio, at least on this specific issue.

It’s just the people that are like “War Bad, Vance Bad, Rubio Good,” which aren’t the whole population, but sizable enough, are just baffling and spurting nonsense.

Vance critics who oppose the Iran War while praising Rubio baffle me. Of course supporting the war and Rubio adds up, and so does opposing the war and Rubio. Supporting Vance and opposing the war on principle but supporting actions since the war started also adds up.

Apparently it’s going to be about the Tom Bombadil chapters left out of the Peter Jackson films: My prediction is Sam’s daughter stumbles upon some section of the Red Book that describes the experience and they go back in time. Bookmark this. Admittedly, this concept is interesting to me, and Stephen Colbert’s passion for LOTR and his personal Catholic faith (although it doesn’t seem to penetrate his public beliefs at all) seems to be the only things he doesn’t have brain worms about so maybe he could tell a faithful adaptation. My outlook though is grim because nothing that comes out of Hollywood for the most part has the ability to properly capture Light and Truth unless it’s by accident.

Some thoughts. 1. Stephen Colbert genuinely is an expert on Tolkien’s works, so it’s not the dumbest choice in the world 2. He’s absolutely going to insert in modern politics into the movie and it’s going to ruin it.

@PastorMarvy “Why didn’t China use this opportunity to start World War III?”

Why China chose not to take over Taiwan in this window still eludes me.

Fuck

@Zaoist4 We sacrificed our long term global reputation for some minor middle eastern gains that not even Israel was supportive of. Additionally, we committed serious acts of cruelty on their population, further delegitimizing our reputation.

Iraq was a long-term success, but few are prepared to admit that.