FedererIsBetterer

20-30 y.o vs 20-30 y.o SWs Fed (01-11) Slams: 34-12 (74%)✅ Bof5s: 39-16 (71%)✅ Bof3s: 51-25 (67%)✅ Weeks at #1: 285✅ YE #1: 5 times✅ Djo (07-17) Slams: 26-19 (58%)❌ Bof5s: 26-21 (55%)❌ Bof3s: 58-41 (59%)❌ Weeks at #1: 223❌ YE #1: 4 times❌ Fed's achievements >> /2

Below is a VIDEO of 29.7-30.9 y.o Fed reaching MPs vs peak Djo in slams on EVERY surface. To me, that is proper proof that PEAK Fed (2004-07) would WALLOP peak Djo. We can ALSO use stats to prove that Fed's CAREER ACHIEVEMENTS >> than ALL of Djo's "main" achievements. A 🧵.

To summarize – Fed did MUCH BETTER than Djo vs the best at their best. Fed is the GREATER PLAYER than Djo. Djo faced the 90s-born bozos & amassed his hollow "records". Conclusion: Fed >>> Djo + Fed is tennis's 👑. QED. /END

TOTAL as 20-39 y.o vs 20-30 y.o SWs Fed (01-21) Slams: 44-25 (64%)✅ Bof5s: 49-29 (63%)✅ Bof3s: 77-47 (62%)✅ Weeks at #1: 310❌ YE #1: 5 times❌ Djo Slams: 31-28 (53%)❌ Bof5s: 31-30 (51%)❌ Bof3s: 66-49 (57%)❌ Weeks at #1: 428✅ YE #1: 8 times✅ Fed's achievements >> /6

@tryambok What I meant by "to miss Fed" was that Djo would've played Fed if had lived up to his seeding. E.g. Djo was #4 at Wim09 & was to meet Fed in the SF, but lost to Haas in the QF. In fact, in 5 of the 6 cases noted, he lost JUST ONE match before his scheduled meeting with Fed.

In slam finals Fed vs (Saf+ARod+Hew+Gonzo): 𝟳-𝟬 ✅ Djo vs (Mur+Stan): 5-4 ❌ Djo MAKES his peers multi-slammers & it's a "strong era". Fed STOPS his peers from winning slams & it's a "weak era". 😂😭🤣 Note: vs (Mur+Stan) in slams Fed: 𝟭𝟮-𝟮 ✅ Djo: 13-6 ❌