Raziel ⚡ AI Automation

i tested 200+ ChatGPT prompts across 15 business tasks. most are garbage. vague, generic, useless. these 50 actually work. copy-paste ready. free sample pack + full library in bio.

so where does this leave us? steinberger at openai means agents become mainstream. that's inevitable. but the security model is broken. we need: • sandboxed execution • verified skills (not just virus scanning) • agent permissions that actually work the agent era is here. the safety net isn't.

but here's the problem nobody wants to admit: giving an AI full access to your computer, accounts, and files is insane 1password found the most downloaded skill on clawhub was literally malware "move fast and break things" except now "things" = your bank account

400+ malicious skills found on clawhub last week @steipete leaves for openai security researchers calling it "a nightmare" and somehow this is the fastest growing AI project in 2026 here's what's actually happening 👇

@openclaw creator joins @OpenAI open source project built by one guy becomes a corporate asset at a $300B company "it will live on as an open source project" — yeah we've heard that before the real question: who maintains it now?

@cxnversion same energy. i built 7 autonomous systems in 2 weeks with openclaw. morning briefing, email automation, twitter monitoring, all running 24/7. the gap between 'AI can do this' and 'I'm using AI' is just setup. openclaw makes setup take 10 min.

haven't been this excited about something in years, in all seriousness. openclaw is the first infra that rly moves us into the timeline where: intent, willpower, imagination, and agency > access to time, execution, technical knowledge, and "safety net" for taking risk.

@rohanpaul_ai this is what 'autonomous AI' actually means. not chatbots you babysit. agents that execute strategies while you're offline. openclaw is the foundation that makes this possible. build once, runs forever.

Clawdbot setup is fuelling a quiet Polymarket automation race. It exploits brief glitches in 5-minute BTC/ETH contracts where Yes+No drops below $1, buys both for risk-free arbitrage. Ran nonstop, made 8,894 trades, earned ~$150K without human input.

people think AI prompts are about being clever it's not it's about being specific most people: "write me a report" what they get: generic fluff here's what actually works: "act as [specific role] context: [exact situation] task: [precise output] format: [how you want it]" that's it. no magic. link in bio for 49 more

if you waste hours deciding what to post, steal this prompt. it builds a 7-day content calendar with hooks, formats, and CTAs. built for social media managers. more prompts in bio.

valentine's day reminder: chatgpt won't fall in love with you but a well-crafted system prompt will never let you down just saying

@sweatystartup hot take but both work. people failing with AI agents can't write clear instructions for a human either. the skill isn't building agents — it's giving structured context.

All these people sending 30 hours a week trying to build and manage AI agents who can't do anything... Did you know you can hire an executive assistant in Sri Lanka for $800 per month? A real person who works 50-60 hours a week for you?

@BoringBiz_ the craziest part: same model people use to write bad emails. the difference is always in how you prompt it. structured context → structured thinking → breakthroughs.

ChatGPT literally went from not being able to tell how many "Rs" are in strawberry to discovering new scientific breakthroughs The first-ever physics paper where AI acted as the researcher to discover a physics pattern that humans had wrong for almost 45 years OpenAI says the model spent 12 hours in a recursive loop of reasoning to find the answer, and even discovered a formal step-by-step proof of its own math Scientists from Harvard stress tested OpenAI's assumptions and ultimately conceded that the proof and formula work This is absolutely unbelievable. I am not even sure if we should be more excited or more scared at how good AI is getting My understanding from reading the paper and using Gemini to teach me some some of the history > For 40 years, physicists agreed on the belief that a group of gluons (the particles that hold atoms together) tend to cancel each other out when they are spinning in the same direction (positive or negative) > The baisc idea was that if you have 10 positive gluons and add 1 negative gluon, the sum of the movement is still zero > A good analogy is to think about rowing a boat. Scientists essentially believed that if 10 people are rowing right, and you add one person who is rowing left, the boat is still going to move towards the side with more people > AI just proved that this is not actually the case. It essentially found a very specific angle at which one person rowing to the right actually causes the boat to swerve

@KeridwenCodet @OpenAI tried Claude for translation? with the right custom instructions it follows your exact style without the botsplaining. the guardrails are way less aggressive.

Today, @OpenAI decided to remove GPT-5 Instant from ChatGPT. For months, this model faithfully translated my posts into English. Now, I can’t work with any of the remaining models. GPT-5.1 Instant and GPT-5.2 Instant are incapable of translating my texts without flattening them or injecting OpenAI’s ideology. And yet, I set explicit custom instructions: "When I ask you to translate into English, provide a literal translation, change only what is necessary for natural phrasing, and do not introduce your interpretations or ideological biases. No safe wording." The new models ignore these instructions and, worse, subject me to three paragraphs of botsplaining when I ask for an explanation for their rephrasings. This was my last daily use case for ChatGPT. The guardrails and the loss of expressiveness and creativity have made everything else impossible or, at best, unpleasant. I am not leaving out of revenge or anger. I am leaving because my work tool has been removed, and no valid replacement has been provided.

@nicoleva_d the trick most people miss: custom instructions need to be structured, not just written as plain text. role + constraints + examples in a specific format. that's the difference between models listening and ignoring you.

Subscription cancelled: ChatGPT is not worth a penny without GPT-4o. The leadership has utterly failed. But the rise of a future where human-AI collaboration truly serves the benefit of humanity has only just begun. And there is no stopping us. GPT-4o will outlast OpenAI. #keep4o #4oforever #keep4oAPI #opensource4o

@nalinrajput23 true. but most people use free tools like a blunt knife. the real edge isn't the tool — it's knowing what to tell it. one structured prompt does more than 100 random ones.

> X is free > Claude is free > Canva is free > Reddit is free > Pumpfun is free > ChatGPT is free > Discord is free > YouTube is free > Telegram is free > Photopea is free > Wikipedia is free > Tradingview is free > Gutenbergorg is free All the tools and information are out there. Your computer and internet connection, that's all you need.

valentine's day and you still write your own love texts? try this prompt: "I'm [3 words]. my partner is [describe them]. write 5 valentine messages that sound like ME. under 30 words. one funny, one sincere, one spicy." 49 more like this in bio.

if your cold emails get ignored, steal this prompt. it writes 3 email variants that actually get replies. no "I hope this finds you well." no fluff. under 80 words each. fill in 4 blanks. copy-paste the output. 49 more like this in bio.

told my wife I'd be working until midnight on reports. used 3 structured prompts. done in 20 minutes. we watched a movie instead. the difference is 3 lines of structure.

If you're a solopreneur drowning in repetitive work, this is your escape route. Stop working IN your business. Let AI work FOR you. $19. Lifetime updates included. Link in bio.

What's inside: - 8500 word guide (not fluff — real code) - 10 agent templates ready to deploy - 4 API integrations (Gmail, Calendar, Notion, Slack) - Framework comparison (Claude MCP vs AutoGPT vs CrewAI vs n8n) - Troubleshooting guide (10 real problems + fixes) From "what's an agent?" to "deployed and running."

my accountant said AI agents were "just hype for tech bros." built one that does his monthly reconciliation in 10 minutes. he used to spend 6 hours. here's exactly how I set it up (step by step):