Section VOI_CoDM
1K posts
Section VOI_CoDM
@section_voi
🌍 Worldviews I ✝️ Polemics I 📚 Logic | Contending with clarity and conviction (Jude 1:3)
Присоединился Ocak 2026
36 Подписки15 Подписчики
People always say Jesus (ﷺ) never said Mohammed (ﷺ) was going to come. But a 5th-century Syriac lectionary manuscript tells us a very DIFFERENT story…
Here in the yellow, it says that the “Mnhammna” will be sent after Jesus, the “praised one,” or Mohammed.
Now will you believe, or are your hearts still blind?
@MasterMaliq Abdool, that is a statement by Jesus and not something Christians came up with.
By the way be honest enough to quote the complete statement unless you are the most dishonest person on earth
English
Christians quote "No one comes to the Father except through me" as if Jesus was introducing a new principle.
He wasn't.
No one came to God in the time of Noah except through Noah.
No one came to God in the time of Moses except through Moses.
No one came to God in the time of Jesus except through Jesus.
The question is simple: if God sent Muhammad after Jesus, why would obedience suddenly stop at Jesus?
The debate isn't about whether God sends messengers.
It's about whether you're willing to follow the last one.
English
@karemooo75 @korrathetaymi Did you read the texts? That there clearly say who the antichrist is. So please stop with your stupid attempt to appeal to emotions and deal with the written texts.
Anyways, nice try, antichrist
English
@section_voi @korrathetaymi According to your dumb logic any non Christian is the antichrist. And whatever that term means you shall not greet me or let me enter your house . So again what is your point?
English
This even extends back to the time of the Prophet ﷺ. The Ashtiname of Muhammad ﷺ is a document where the Prophet ﷺ granted protection and provisions to Christians, given to the monks of Saint Catherine’s Monastery.
But Christians?
2 John 1:10 “If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not take them into your house or welcome them.”
You cannot even go into their house.
Well done, @TuckerCarlson. Well done.
Clash Report@clashreport
Theologian JD Hall to Tucker Carlson: The Muslim rulers didn't tax churches during the Ottoman period. They were very kind to Christians. As a matter of fact, they took care of our holy sites. Islamic authorities rebuilt the Church of the Holy Sepulchre three different times over the centuries. They had a law protecting Christian pilgrims on their journey. Nobody messed with the pilgrims.
Català
@karemooo75 @korrathetaymi Are you admitting that you are an antichrist?
I wouldn't be surprised you are, considering what is written in 1 John 2:22–23.
English
@HalalNation_ Abdool, just regurgitating what he's been fed like a bot with zero awareness.
Kindly show me where I can find this very so-called preaching of Jesus
English
The REAL FOLLOWERS OF JESUS ARE MUSLIMS ☪️
According to Islam, Jesus preached that there is only ONE GOD, Allah.
English
@muslimorthodoxy Shameless lying Abdool, kindly show me where Jesus endorsed child marriage, let alone prescribed a waiting period for divorcing a minor who has not yet reached puberty.
I'll wait.
English
Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING that this apologist criticizes the prophet Mohammed for, Jesus endorses in his own holy book!
So why doesn’t this apologist just become an atheist ?
GodLogic_GL@GodLogic_GL
Abandon Muhammad, follow Christ. Jesus is a better example than Muhammad, even in Islam.
English
@MercifulMessage The next Dawah phase: "lets finally come out and admit that MuhamMAD is our Allah"
English
@korrathetaymi A new level of Muslim MADness unlocked. Jesus followed and called to MuhamMAD, the master of all prophets, indeed
English
Abandon a cursed Jesus (Galatians 3:13).
Abandon a God that walked the earth with two natures.
Abandon a “Trinity” that is illogical.
Follow the blessed Jesus, who followed and called to the master of all prophets, Muhammad (ﷺ).
GodLogic_GL@GodLogic_GL
Abandon Muhammad, follow Christ. Jesus is a better example than Muhammad, even in Islam.
English
@Kryptotajeer What's even more amusing is that you understand the meaning of "transcend" and readily apply it to almost every discussion about God, except when His nature is the subject. Suddenly, at that point, you forget that God's nature transcends ours as well.
Inconsistent logic
English
Is there any logically consistent reality where this equation is true?
English
@David_Y3 @NyranStanton The lies you keep telling yourself., bozo.
English
@NyranStanton Muhammad (SAW) did not create Islam; rather Islam comes from the time of Adam. Adam, Noah, Moses, Jesus, David — they were all Muslims. Muhammad (SAW), the final prophet of this religion, and he was unlettered; he never read the Bible or any other scripture.
English
King David was a Muslim. At that time, there was no religion called Judaism; this name was given much later. They were originally called the Children of Israel, meaning the sons of Jacob. They were not called Jews. But King David was a Muslim according to his deeds and actions.
English
Section VOI_CoDM@section_voi
@korrathetaymi The reason is given in that chapter, read from 17–24. They understood the Jewish hostility toward Paul because of his teachings and thought having him observe the Jewish custom would help calm the crowd. On a plain reading, the decision was a matter of human judgement.
QME
If Paul was a straightforward believer in the new covenant, that Jesus Christ’s death was an atonement for sins and that you no longer needed a sin sacrifice, why, when he was accused of teaching false doctrine, did he participate, at the order of James, in a sin sacrifice?
Is this taqiyya? Or his actual belief?
English
@Kryptotajeer Stop being dump, regurgitating only what you have been fed with.
Like I adviced, Korra, your chamion, read that chapter from verse 17
x.com/i/status/20579…
Section VOI_CoDM@section_voi
@korrathetaymi The reason is given in that chapter, read from 17–24. They understood the Jewish hostility toward Paul because of his teachings and thought having him observe the Jewish custom would help calm the crowd. On a plain reading, the decision was a matter of human judgement.
English
If Christians were to read the Bible from a critical perspective, they would clearly see how inconsistent Paul is.
Korra The Taymi@korrathetaymi
If Paul was a straightforward believer in the new covenant, that Jesus Christ’s death was an atonement for sins and that you no longer needed a sin sacrifice, why, when he was accused of teaching false doctrine, did he participate, at the order of James, in a sin sacrifice? Is this taqiyya? Or his actual belief?
English
@korrathetaymi @GodLogic_GL If only you could set aside your pride and read what I asked you to read weeks ago.
The text is not difficult to comprehend when read in its proper context. So, once again, dear ultracrepidarian Muslima, read that chapter from verse 17.
Glad to help.
Section VOI_CoDM@section_voi
@korrathetaymi The reason is given in that chapter, read from 17–24. They understood the Jewish hostility toward Paul because of his teachings and thought having him observe the Jewish custom would help calm the crowd. On a plain reading, the decision was a matter of human judgement.
English
So yesterday, @GodLogic_GL was unable to answer this. Maybe you guys can help him.
When Jesus said, “It is finished,” on the cross, it is taken to mean that the offering of sin sacrifice is over. But Paul and James continued to give sin sacrifices and follow what Paul calls the “cursed law” in Galatians 3:10. Why would the apostles of Jesus continue to follow and observe a cursed law if Jesus was going around preaching that his blood would do away with all of this?
When you guys have no answer, please look into Islam and worship the same God Jesus did.
English
@Kryptotajeer @GodLogic_GL Well it is not strange to know that your low IQ cannot comprehend what he is asking regarding who scribed down what was revealed of your Quran. Nice try, bozo
English
Avery (@GodLogic_GL just had another embarrassing moment. Every single time, he proves he is nowhere near the level he thinks he is. This time, not only did he lie about the companion of the Prophet (Abd Allah ibn Sa’d ibn Abi Sarh ), but he kept conflating the authorship anonymity of the Gospels with the writing down of the Qur’an as if they are equivalent cases when it comes to preservation.
Check the comment section
For rebuttal!
English
@MasterMaliq You are very correct on this one, Malik.
Do we now call this the Hadith Dilemma for Muslims?
English
Someone called me a “Quranist” because I reject Hadith that don’t make sense to me.
So I asked him a simple question: how many books did the Prophet actually use to judge between people?
He said, “One. The Quran.”
Then I asked, “What other book?”
He said, “None.”
So I said, if that’s the case, are we now going to admit the Prophet himself judged with the Quran alone?
Silence.
Sometimes people argue themselves into a corner without realising it.
It really is that simple.
English
