Sovaddemtu

"Then she- you promise you won't tell?" "Don't worry, this stays between US TWO until you are ready..." nytimes.com/2014/07/21/us/… gawker.com/5637234/gcreep… No bugs in your flour, Ylva? #sElloUts #StopChatControl #mybodymymessagesmyprivacy #stakeholdertakeover

The fact that this was so close to being passed should make every one of us worried.

Section 702 lets the government spy on Americans’ communications without a warrant. Now Congress is debating renewing it for several years. We must not let that happen without major reforms. Watch @TrevorTimm explain and learn how you can help: freedom.press/reform-section…

Fighting for privacy has become a threat to the commercial powers that wants to gather and sell our data. AI and mass surveillance fanatics attacks us on all sides and they pay politicians to get it. Palantir is just one example. They don't care about our safety. Read this!

@tetsu_tamasi Gunnar Strömmer:

Gunnar Strömmer(M), Minister of Justice, #ChatControl supporter, during an interview on Politikbyrån. Journalist: Can we see your latest sms? Gunnar: Eeh, no, you can not. J: Why can't we get to see your recent sms? G: It is for what I believe to be obvious private reasons.

Good question to ask those who support chat control.

Check out. Smart City projects in 11 African countries reveal major digital authoritarianism risks biometricupdate.com/202603/smart-c… via @BiometricUpdate #tech #digital #privacy #crypto #ai

Today our Judiciary Committee will vote on HR 8037 to give exemptions for DATA CENTERS from environmental regulations. I’ll vote No, because no industry deserves special treatment under the law. If the regulations are too onerous, repeal them for everyone.grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5…

CachyOS, a “Performance-First Linux, Built on Arch”, has made a rather peculiar statement in regard to possible Age Verification in their Linux distro. The CachyOS stance appears to be that they are “not doing anything” about Age Verification… but if you disagree with Age Verification you should “find another distribution”. At the same time, anti-Age Verification posts have been officially declared “radical” and will result in censorship and banning from CachyOS. The statement: “CachyOS is not located in areas where this is a thing CachyOS is not doing anything in regards to this CachyOS uses SystemD
 If you don’t want to use SystemD find another distribution STOP asking about these two things
 STOP attacking people about these two things 
STOP being radical about these two things” The CachyOS developer has been actively deleting posts where people ask about, or express opinions against, Age Verification. “If I personally see radical postings relating to these two things I won’t bother to just waste time removing the post I will remove you, you are not contributing anything of use here” Even simple, non abrasive questions, such as “Is CachyOS going to implement Age Verification” are getting locked and censored. discuss.cachyos.org/t/age-verifica…

🚨 Er... this seems important, just casually loaded on .gov. The government is going to remove a layer of public transparency by stopping consultations with the public. It will ask Ai to help determine what public consultations are unnecessary (Will those be defined as consultations the government knows wont give them the answers it wants) How will we ever know? And how will they know if we agree or not? they won’t and that’s the point. Wow, Shocking 💣

Full release. You may disagree with my read of this. You are of course entitled to do that. gov.uk/government/new…

An Amazon data center in Oregon went online in 2011. It has since poisoned “the deepest reaches of the local aquifer,” & is causing cancer/rare diseases. “He noticed a rise in bizarre medical conditions among the county’s 45,000 residents, linked to toxins in the local water.”

@EPPGroup > these groups have now blocked the only workable solution to maintain the detection and reporting of child sexual abuse online. For some reason you are completely ignoring the capability for people to report it by themselves, or for states to educate people to do that. Why?

This is how European political groups voted on Chat-Control. Green: Stopping Chat-Control Red: Allowing Chat-Control The difference was one vote.

Yes. Monitoring everyone else is okay, but he doesn't want to show his messages. That is a violation to his privacy. You can't make this shit up. Power is corruption. Power wants control.

@EPPGroup Chat monitoring is not an effective way of protecting children and young people from digital sexual exploitation x.com/InfoOetken/sta…

🇪🇺 EU ENDS MASS MESSAGE SCANNING – BUT THE FIGHT IS NOT OVER The European Parliament just voted against extending Chat Control 1.0, a law that allowed for the "voluntary" scanning of private messages to detect unlawful activity. The legal basis for voluntary scanning will expire on April 3rd, causing any service provider operating in the EU to halt the scanning of messages immediately. But the fight is not over. The extension was meant to serve as a bridge between the emergency measure Chat Control 1.0 and the permanent Chat Control 2.0, which would require the scanning of messages by law. The next Trilogue negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 are set for May and June 2026, after which the law could be adopted by the EU Parliament and Council as early as July. Call your MEPs today and tell them NO TO CHAT CONTROL

@moderaterna Män som misshandlar sin partner planerar nog inte detta i samtal eller chattar. Det sker i plötslig vrede över något de anser vara partnerns fel. Ge stöd till kvinnojourer och skyddat boende för att hjälpa och skydda dem som är utsatta för våldet.

now this: twitter.com/moderaterna/st… "The police SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO EAVESDROP ON CONVERSATIONS to prevent men's deadly violence against women." 🇸🇪 Conservative party Moderaterna are busy throwing whatever topic to see which sticks & usher 🇸🇪 deeper into a mass surveilance state.

"there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future..." ...imagine a school closing its library and reporting its librarian as a safeguarding risk for stocking 1984, because AI says so dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…