@nova_jewels0@VoaroYT@LDNTeletubby@shukurada@LiteralMem3s If you think someone's statement is incorrect, you need to give a reason for why it is incorrect. Who stated the opinion is irrelevant in the validity or accuracy of it. You attacking them for their age shows that you only try to attack someone instead of having a conversation.
@Sillydemonboi@verlaineq Ye didn't choose anything. Kotoko beat Mahiru before Kazui found out what was going on, he only was able to intervene when she moved on to beat Fuuta
@VoaroYT@nova_jewels0@LDNTeletubby@shukurada@LiteralMem3s Many lesbian women use that definition, which is valid because it describes their personal experience. However, many people use the definition of non-men loving non-men to be inclusive of people outside of the binary spectrum.
Besides, this convo was about trans WOMEN so...
@RolyPolyFish@27literhorse The intent of the shirt was to pretend to include everyone, while excluding people. So yes, if you pretend to be trans-inclusive for a joke but are actually excluding people, that is transphobic. Also, humans aren't anomalies
@theaceeditor@27literhorse So a shirt representing basic biology of the normal human body should also depict all anomalies or it's transphobic?
Is a shirt that depicts a human as having 2 arms and 2 legs ableist because it doesn't represent all the possible configurations of humans missing limbs?
@RolyPolyFish@27literhorse Not all cis women have the same kind of uterus, many trans men have an uterus and many trans women had surgeries to medically transition