Middlestick

Biggest W of my entire career

Since all the lolicons are looking at my twitter: You deny your attraction to lolicon art is in any way connected to being attracted to real children. If someone was getting excited by fictional erotica (erotic literature) featuring loli child characters, if you're aroused by that, is that closer or more distant from an attraction to real children than lolicon art?

🤫 CENSURA AL LÍMITE EN COREA DEL SUR Las estrictas leyes de Corea del Sur han obligado a cientos de ilustradores a fingir ser japoneses. Crear contenido maduro o sugerente puede significar prisión. Por eso muchos artistas publican sus obras solo en japonés o inglés y eliminan cualquier rastro de su idioma natal para evitar ser rastreados.

My challenge to loli lovers: Go to a relative of yours in real life and tell them that you gratify yourself to depictions of little girls. You won't. You're sick. That's why you try so hard to validate it online and hide behind a username. Not gonna work, sorry!

でたー海外の「対人性愛中心主義者」だーwwwwww 本物だーwwww マジでおるんやな、あっちにも。 フィクション上の性行動と、現実の性行動が必ず一致してるはずだと思い込んどる視野の狭い人間wwww

"It's fictional content!" "No real children are being harmed!" Contrary to popular belief, artists don't conjure images from a void in their imagination. It's actually impossible to think up a totally original, unique idea that isn't derived from something that already exists. What reference material do you think loli artists use for anatomy, pose, proportions etc? Just because anime or cartoons are stylized doesn't mean that they're entirely detached from real human anatomy. The reason why predators keep getting caught with this stuff is because these drawings are depicting child anatomy in a manner that pedophiles find arousing. The other people looking at it aren't necessarily going to molest a real child, but they still have a pedophilic attraction. What I find fascinating is how many l*licons are willing to condemn Shadman for drawing explicit art of real children or child actresses, while tolerating drawings that "are not based on real children". Bro, they all are. The only difference is the extent to which it looks like a specific child. If it looks like one kid it's not okay, but if the drawing is based on pictures of 10 kids it's fine? How does this work? Do you think someone like Chibireviews is evaluating what material the artist use as reference when drawing the pictures in his special folder? If all you have is the final product, you really can't, unless you're already familiar with the source material. For all he knows, the artist might've used CSAM as reference. You think the artist is going to say that publicly? It could also be CSAM passed through an AI filter. As AI models get better that's only going to become less noticeable and more likely to happen. Vaush already had a bunch of AI images in his tax folder that he didn't notice were AI.

This guy, EDPwatch, who has been catching real predators, protecting real victims, says his biggest W is getting blocked by an anime reviewer, Chibi Reviews. Chibi is an anime-centric content creator who is fighting for free speech and against censorship. EDP Watch runs its own real-life sting operations by creating fake underage profiles, chats with adults who attempt to meet minors, and then confronts them when they show up. Recently, EDPwatch has been having some obsession with policing anime/loli content, acting as if that content has a direct correlation to predatory behavior. Spoiler alert, it doesn't... Fantasy sexual material, such as drawings and animated content, shows no meaningful causal link, with some studies suggesting it actually reduces risk. On the other hand, REAL CSAM does HIGHLY correlate with offender behavior. Now the insinuation here is that a lot of predators also consume sexual lolicon content, and that's true, but it doesn't prove a correlation. Why? Because predators already consume a lot of taboo content broadly, from regular adult material, to violent material, to extreme content, and just happen to also have loli content. There is also a "Base-Rate" problem where millions consume loli content, especially in Japan, without ever offending or even coming close to it. You only see the overlap in the tiny slice of actual predators who have already been caught for real crimes. A lot of people like EDP and Schlep, who catch predators, use evidence of loli content existing within the offender's library as "correlation" to offending behavior, when there are no meaningful connections. They also consume a lot of other content, such as taboo 'banned' horror, cult movies, and other illegal content, but no one fixates on that. They instead fixate just on the loli stuff, treating it like a smoking gun, when there are tons of other problematic edgy media in the offender's hard drives... again, that's just selective moral panic. The sad part of this is how EDP watch went full clown mode when his whole brand was catching real predators. It just goes to show how many of these "predator catchers" like EDP and Schlep drift from actual victim protection into culture wars.

My challenge to loli lovers: Go to a relative of yours in real life and tell them that you gratify yourself to depictions of little girls. You won't. You're sick. That's why you try so hard to validate it online and hide behind a username. Not gonna work, sorry!