S.E. Cupp

53.8K posts

S.E. Cupp banner
S.E. Cupp

S.E. Cupp

@secupp

JOBS: Author, CNN, NYDN. iHeart. LIKES: John. RELIGION: Jack. SIGN: The one everyone gets along with. SKILLS: @jeopardy winner. @inaraorg

Instagram @secupp เข้าร่วม Ocak 2009
10.4K กำลังติดตาม406.8K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
S.E. Cupp
S.E. Cupp@secupp·
We're all dealing with a lot. Here's what I'm going through. I hope it finds its way to someone who needs to know they're not alone. Thanks for reading, and bearing with me. ❤️ nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-ope…
English
1.3K
864
7.3K
0
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
NASA
NASA@NASA·
Liftoff. The Artemis II mission launched from @NASAKennedy at 6:35pm ET (2235 UTC), propelling four astronauts on a journey around the Moon. Artemis II will pave the way for future Moon landings, as well as the next giant leap — astronauts on Mars.
English
3.8K
55.5K
178.6K
14M
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
NASA Artemis
NASA Artemis@NASAArtemis·
Moonbound. The Artemis II mission lifted off from @NASAKennedy's Launch Complex 39B today at 6:35pm ET (2235 UTC).
NASA Artemis tweet media
English
337
3K
20.4K
637.3K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
David French
David French@DavidAFrench·
So incredible. We can still do great things. Godspeed Artemis II.
NASA@NASA

Liftoff. The Artemis II mission launched from @NASAKennedy at 6:35pm ET (2235 UTC), propelling four astronauts on a journey around the Moon. Artemis II will pave the way for future Moon landings, as well as the next giant leap — astronauts on Mars.

English
20
72
1.2K
53.4K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Yashar Ali 🐘
Yashar Ali 🐘@yashar·
GOP Senator John Kennedy on why he felt it was important to apologize and acknowledge the truth about the bombing of a school in Minab, Iran, which multiple reports indicate was caused by a U.S. military targeting error. “Because I think it's the truth…we're investigating, but I'm not gonna hide behind that…I think it was a terrible, terrible mistake. I wish it hadn't happened. I'm sorry it happened. I can assure you it wasn't intentional. And when you make a mistake, you ought to admit it.”
English
113
527
4K
502.2K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Covie
Covie@covie_93·
Marco Rubio on Tuesday: "Iran is run by lunatics, religious fanatic lunatics." The White House Thursday:
English
1.9K
10.3K
40.2K
1.4M
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Ben Sasse
Ben Sasse@BenSasse·
When we announced that @ConanOBrien would be one of our first podcast guests, the response was pretty uniform: How in the world do you know Conan? (Truth is, I didn’t —but when you’re dying from cancer, it’s awkward for people to say no.) More seriously, Conan is a funny man, a rooted dad, and now — weirdly — a movie star. Check out our latest #NotDeadYet podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/not…
English
40
193
2.4K
289.5K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Andrew Kaczynski
Andrew Kaczynski@KFILE·
my latest for CNN: Trump and his top officials warned for **years** war with Iran would waste American lives, be destabilizing, costly, and not in our interest. One example: Trump: "He’ll start a war, you know, lives will be wasted for no reason.” Hannity: "That would be the most chilling abuse of powers, what you're describing in American history." Trump: "It will be in a mess."
English
29
492
945
126.3K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Andrew Kaczynski
Andrew Kaczynski@KFILE·
one of my favorite markwayne mullin tidbits is right before the January 6th riot he dismissed on local radio people saying there'd be violence because, "We're not the Democratic Party. We're not antifa." Still have my notes from it.
Andrew Kaczynski tweet media
English
15
256
655
29K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Carl
Carl@HistoryBoomer·
It’s cool that Salman Rushdie has outlived 2 Ayatollahs.
Carl tweet mediaCarl tweet media
English
585
6.5K
55.5K
1.4M
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Kurt Andersen
Kurt Andersen@KBAndersen·
Trump/Hegseth operational security: at a restaurant a 2-minute walk from the White House, someone was having a conversation about the attacks on Iran that were going to start in 6 hours. Loud enough for the founder of @TMZ to talk about it in real time with his podcast cohost.
TMZ@TMZ

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: A group at a Washington D.C. restaurant was talking openly in the bar area Friday afternoon about a national secret that was about to literally explode hours later -- the bombing of Iran. Details: tmz.com/2026/02/28/men…

English
43
1.4K
3.7K
234.5K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Brian Tyler Cohen
Brian Tyler Cohen@briantylercohen·
Three Americans dead and Trump’s UN Ambassador waves it off with some bullshit jingoism. From the people who wailed about Benghazi for a decade. Absolute soulless ghouls.
Brian Tyler Cohen tweet media
English
309
1.7K
6.1K
199.2K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Jenni
Jenni@hashjenni·
How many countries does a guy gotta bomb to win a Nobel Peace Prize around here?
English
248
3.6K
42.6K
617.5K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Cuckturd
Cuckturd@CattardSlim·
Republicans deleting all their tweets about WWIII Peacetime Presidents Warmongers Boots on the ground Your kids dying The draft....
English
480
8.9K
48.9K
704.3K
S.E. Cupp รีทวีตแล้ว
Justin Amash
Justin Amash@justinamash·
The paid grifters, partisan hacks, and bots are out in force—misleading people about the Constitution and the law—to defend Trump’s unconstitutional war. Here’s an important Iran war PSA: Contrary to what you may have heard about the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1550), it does not allow the president to take military action for any reason for 60–90 days without congressional approval so long as the president notifies Congress within 48 hours. Section 1541(c) of the War Powers Resolution states clearly: “The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.” Of the three cited authorities, not one indicates a presidential power to take unilateral (without Congress’s approval) offensive military action. The first two authorities allow the president to take offensive military action but only with Congress’s express approval (Article I of the Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war). The third authority allows the president to take defensive military action without Congress’s approval in the event of a specific type of national emergency, a sudden unforeseen attack on the United States (happening too quickly for Congress to meet) necessitating immediate action to protect Americans. It’s for this last situation (or for situations in which the president introduces forces into hostilities unlawfully) that the War Powers Resolution provides for the oft-mentioned 48-hour report to Congress (§ 1543) and 60-day (up to 90-day) timeline (§ 1544). If there’s an attack in progress on the United States (i.e., currently happening), we expect the president to respond swiftly to neutralize the attack and protect Americans—and then we will hold the president to account. The Framers of the Constitution agreed at the debates in the federal convention of 1787 that the president should have the “power to repel sudden attacks” but not the power to otherwise introduce forces into hostilities without congressional approval. The War Powers Resolution does not confer any new authority on the president to take offensive military action without congressional approval—nor could it under our Constitution. It instead checks the president when, as the Framers contemplated, the president introduces our Armed Forces into hostilities to repel a sudden attack. The fact that previous presidents have violated both the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution does not—and cannot—change the law or make any present military action lawful.
English
253
1.5K
4.4K
299.6K