Austin

BREAKING INEC affirms David Mark authentic Chairman of ADC in Court. Up Next is, the resignation of the partisan INEC Chairman, Prof. Joash Ojo Amupitan! #Amupitanout

INEC CHIAMAN PROFESSOR AMUPITAN NEED TO RESIGN HE IS WORKING FOR APC OR ELSE NO ELECTION NEXT YEAR.

How are we going into an election with a well-known APC guy as Chief Umpire? Nah, this doesn’t make sense in any way! #AmupitanMustGo

Just to visit Bayelsa State. Convoy killed 3 people. Police and the military fought each other. A very bad omen.

No wonder Amupitan is trying to destroy the ADC. Amupitan was shouting victory is sure in 2023. That means 2027 is a waste of time if he remains the INEC chairman.

Now that INEC @inecnigeria has canceled the criminal revalidation exercise, the next thing is to restore David Mark’s name on its portal, followed by the resignation of Amupitan. We won't rest until these two things are achieved. #AmupitanMustGo

The INEC Chairman should be pressured to resign. He can't conduct the 2027 elections.

President Tinibu convoy just k!!led 3 people in Bayelsa 💔 For my front 😭

OUR LAWS AND DEMOCRACY MUST BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES The Nigerian Bar Association has closely monitored recent political and legal developments as the nation gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections. These developments, particularly those arising from the interpretation and potential application of provisions of the Electoral Act 2026, raise serious constitutional, democratic, and rule-of-law concerns that require immediate intervention. We particularly deprecate the disturbing involvement by lawyers and courts in the internal affairs of political parties despite the clear provisions of the Electoral Act, 2026, which stipulates in Section 83 of the Act that “No court in Nigeria shall entertain jurisdiction over any suit or matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party.” Not only are courts denied jurisdiction to entertain any matter pertaining to the internal affairs of a political party, but they are also precluded from granting any interim or interlocutory injunction even where any action has been brought in violation of the Act. The section further provides that “Where such an action is brought in negation of this provision, no interim or interlocutory injunction shall be entertained by the Court, but the Court shall suspend its ruling and deliver it at the stage of final judgment and shall give accelerated hearing to the matter”. What we now see are situations where actions are not only instituted in Courts by lawyers in clear violation of the Act, but Courts purportedly grant interim and/or interlocutory injunctions in clear contempt of statutory provisions of the law. This does not augur well for our democracy. Democracy will not thrive in a situation where lawyers and courts take actions and decisions that not only negate our laws but also do violence to them. This emerging trend of subverting the clear letters of the Electoral Act and dragging courts into the internal affairs of political parties through disingenuous litigation, forum shopping, and malafide applications designed to secure undemocratic political advantage, bodes no good for our democracy. Such practices, if not immediately curbed, would directly contradict the clear intendment of the Electoral Act and risk transforming the judicial processes into avenues for political score-settling or electoral manipulation. We must reiterate that these provisions were clearly designed to curb abuse of court processes and discourage forum shopping in political disputes. This is therefore why the NBA is concerned that the abuse, misapplication, or selective deployment of these provisions may create opportunities for manipulation capable of undermining democratic competition and shrinking the political space. Members of the Bar are reminded that they are Ministers in the Temple of Justice and not political agents seeking judicial endorsement of partisan objectives. The filing of actions intended to draw courts into internal political party disputes, particularly where jurisdiction is expressly excluded, constitutes an abuse of court process and a violation of professional responsibility. The NBA will take firm steps to deter such conduct. Lawyers who deliberately file actions aimed at procuring judicial interference in intra-party affairs, or who seek ex parte or interlocutory orders in clear violation of statutory provisions, risk facing disciplinary proceedings. We will not hesitate to present petitions before the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) against any Legal Practitioner found to be engaging in such conduct. This will be pursued decisively to serve as a deterrent and to preserve the sanctity of the judicial process. The Nigerian judiciary must stay vigilant and resist being drawn into political theatrics. Courts should firmly decline invitations, no matter how artfully crafted, to intervene in matters the law explicitly bars them from.

Who made the law that the president should appoint Inec chairman in the first place? What sort of law is that?

Here is another receipt. This is even more scandoulous. Professor Joash Amupitan must step aside.

A country where 4 years aren't enough to finish a 4.52km road even after blowing N279bn 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

INEC Chairman, Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan is a renowned APC member. His X (formerly Twitter) account from 2022 has surfaced, & he openly supported Tinubu at the last election. His account name was recently changed. Joash Amupitan has locked his X Account. A partisan INEC Chairman has no business presiding over our elections, & he must resign immediately. @joashamupitan was recently changed to @Sundayvibe00. The account is now private. I expect the ADC to take this up immediately.

Im seeing posts where the X handle of the New INEC chairman Josh Amupitan was bitterly insulting Obidients as recently as 2022/ 2023. His handler is already deleting them. That man has to go. He is already Compromised. He cannot run a free and fair election for Nigerians. 🤔😤🤬

#AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign #AmupitanMustResign

BREAKING: INEC Chairman locks his X account amid controversy. Deleting posts won’t change anything calls for his resignation continue.

E don cast. Your INEC Chairman is a fr@ud.

Everyone should hate APC It is your civic responsibility.

BREAKING: Nigerians Demand Resignation of Amupitan Over Partisan Tweets Declaring “Victory is Sure” for APC and Tinubu parallelfactsnews.com/nigerians-dema…

Joash Amupitan has now been confirmed to be a Tinubu fanboy through his 2023 pro APC posts. Guess what their response was? Renaming his Twitter handle to make it look like some sort of parody account and locking it. Forgetting that your username history is a public knowledge that cannot be completely erased especially with Grok now being in the picture. And the fact that we let these kinds of morons do these things to us and get away with them is why I’m actually livid.