K

48.5K posts

K

K

@kahdec

England, United Kingdom เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2009
198 กำลังติดตาม918 ผู้ติดตาม
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Sophie Corcoran
Sophie Corcoran@sophielouisecc·
This is literally the state of the UK summed up in one campaign add
English
30
105
603
32.9K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
BLAIM GAME
BLAIM GAME@BLAIMGame·
“I once appointed the best friend of the World’s most notorious paedophile to one of the highest jobs in government and when caught out I blamed everyone else.”
BLAIM GAME tweet media
English
1
7
32
323
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
Bastardising British history to tell an 'inclusive national story' and insert historically illiterate diversity must end.
English
260
1.4K
9.8K
151.4K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Sandy Tregent
Sandy Tregent@SandyofSuffolk·
Amazing isn't it. Lee Anderson gets kicked out of the chamber for calling Starmer what he is. A liar. Convicted criminal Tulip Siddiq get kicked out of............nothing. Oh the wonders of modern politics. 🙄
English
11
55
353
1.9K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Baa Ram Ewe 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🐑🐷🦃🚜
To summarise: Kemi asked Keir some weeks ago at PMQs if he’d seen Mandelson’s continued relations with Epstein in the ‘Official Security Vetting’ Despite never seeing the Official Security Vetting, Starmer answers: ‘Yes I did’ Mislead No 1. Today Starmer denies ever misleading the house. Mislead No 2. When asked directly about this clip Starmer answers that he was referring to the Due Dilligence Report. He wasn’t asked about the Due Dilligence Report, he was asked about the ‘Official Security Vetting’. He is then asked if he knows the difference between the two by another MP. His response is that he does know the difference. Another MP then asks why he responded ‘Yes I did’ to the question about Official Security Advice if he hadn’t seen it and had only seen the Due Diligence Report. Starmer essentially says: Because he inferred that the question was about Epstein. It’s his job to answer the question. He was asked specifically about the Official Security Vetting. By replying without stating that his response was not re: The Official Security Vetting - because he hadn’t seen it - but about the Due Dilligence Report he Misled the House again. His response to this question inferred that he’d seen the Official Security Vetting when he hadn’t. His response misled the House to that fact. Misled the House no 3. He must be called back to correct the record.
Baa Ram Ewe 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🐑🐷🦃🚜@ShepherdWales

Now he is saying that he was interpreting/assuming/predicting what the LOTO was asking and answered accordingly . That’s simply not acceptable because in doing so he misled the house to believe that HE HAD SEEN THE OFFICIAL VETTING AND THAT MANDELSON HAD PASSED DESPITE EPSTIEN… That is misleading the House Sir Keir!

English
7
70
208
6.9K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Fatbaldbloke
Fatbaldbloke@Fatbaldbloke1·
"To us, he's just Adolf"
Fatbaldbloke tweet media
English
26
86
679
8.3K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Alex Armstrong
Alex Armstrong@Alexarmstrong·
BREAKING: Sir Oliver Robbins is tomorrow reportedly set to say that Keir Starmer PRESSURED the Foreign Office into appointing Mandelson, during his appearance before the Foreign Affairs Select Committee. This will be consistent with his first statement to the committee.
Alex Armstrong tweet media
English
37
205
873
10.1K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
GB Politics
GB Politics@GBPolitcs·
🚨BREAKING: Olly Robbins is set to accuse Keir Starmer tomorrow of pressuring the Foreign Office into approving Peter Mandelson’s appointment [@thetimes]
English
35
124
1.3K
25.7K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Andrew Bowie MP
Andrew Bowie MP@AndrewBowie_MP·
Thing is, I actually believe that this most incurious Prime Minister, who thinks his job is to sit mannequin -like atop of Government thinks he has done nothing wrong. Which is actually worse. He has misled Parliament. He appointed Mandy. He has no judgment. He needs to go.
English
7
25
192
2K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
FreeByTheSea
FreeByTheSea@Free_ByTheSea·
If Starmer put as much effort into saving this country as he is into saving himself, Britain would be thriving. What a waste of time!!
English
11
37
385
3.3K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Matty Dread
Matty Dread@MattyDread·
This was Keir Starmers Jeremy Corbyn moment. When the whole house laughs at you, its time to pack your bags surely?
English
16
192
1.4K
16.5K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Priti Patel MP
Priti Patel MP@pritipatel·
Starmer’s failure to give honest answers about his decision to appoint Mandelson & the security risks he posed shows a lack of leadership, respect for Epstein's victims & a disregard of our national security.  It’s time he took responsibility & resign. telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/…
English
61
79
448
5.9K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Imtiaz Mahmood
Imtiaz Mahmood@ImtiazMadmood·
This is the most senior civil servant in the country. I am losing my patience with these people. - Rupert Lowe
English
10
238
1.2K
30.7K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Goosey
Goosey@Goosey30111568·
I don't think we've ever had a more deceitful, incompetent and lying PM, than we have now. He's broken Johnsons record by a country mile.
English
65
114
1K
6.7K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
WasAcop
WasAcop@WasAcop·
🚨 BREAKING: ALL EYES ON OLLY ROBBINS RIGHT NOW! Will this guy grab the 40 pieces of silver from Starmer... and crush his entire future in one suicidal move and kiss goodbye to any senior gig in politics or big business forever?! Or will he confirm what we all suspect... that Starmer knew? Testimony drops tomorrow... 👀😱
WasAcop tweet media
English
113
325
1.1K
31.1K