
Good question. ADM doesn’t have a hard supply cap.
The 100M figure is the genesis pool only a fixed quantity distributed during the launch phase via two paths (70% burn-to-mint, 30% validator block rewards). Once the pool is fully claimed (or 5 years pass, whichever first), the launch phase ends.
After that, post-launch issuance kicks in on a fixed, hard-coded schedule:
— 4% per year, Years 1–5
— 3% per year, Years 6–10
— 2% per year, Years 11–20
— 1% per year, perpetual thereafter
This issuance pays validators for ongoing consensus work and a small slice for witnesses.
Counterbalancing the issuance is fee burn. Transaction fees (EIP-1559-style base fees) are burned on most fee dimensions, removing ADM from circulation. Under heavy network usage, burn exceeds issuance and supply contracts.
Under light usage, supply expands slowly.
So the supply behaviour is:
— Launch phase: 100M ADM enters circulation via burn-to-mint and validator rewards.
— Post-launch: continuous slow issuance offset by fee burn. Net direction depends on usage.
— No upper bound. No “maxed out” state. No issuance cliff.
The schedule is fixed at genesis and cannot be modified except by socially-coordinated hard fork same model as Bitcoin’s monetary policy.
English


