Axstroes

6 posts

Axstroes

Axstroes

@Axstro156

Sumali Ocak 2024
6 Sinusundan0 Mga Tagasunod
Axstroes
Axstroes@Axstro156·
@PRENDSTAPAIX @LEscapology @charybdeez Your misunderstanding mirs larger point which he goes into explaining that he reject the idea of a material thing that isn't hypothetical of someone that has truly no use
English
0
0
0
37
miami vice
miami vice@PRENDSTAPAIX·
@Axstro156 @LEscapology @charybdeez if they are proved to be useful they serve no purpose in the argument. you're basically shooting your own leg and thinking that killed marx.
English
0
0
8
184
Axstroes
Axstroes@Axstro156·
@LEscapology @charybdeez But this is misunderstand mirs point his point he makes is that there is no cuh thing in reality that is truly useless, he rejects the hypothetical as not meaningful
English
0
0
0
41
Linguini’s Escapology
Linguini’s Escapology@LEscapology·
@Axstro156 @charybdeez ‘Mud pie’ is used as a stand-in for ‘item which no one wants or uses’ in an argument against labour theory of value. It just means ‘useless thing’, arguing about the example you use is worthless
English
2
0
24
320