부산멸공아지매🇰🇷🇺🇸🇯🇵🇮🇱🇧🇷🗽
463 posts

부산멸공아지매🇰🇷🇺🇸🇯🇵🇮🇱🇧🇷🗽
@B_CCP_OUT
대한민국 부산 자유우파 여성 3n 전세계 자유우파 친구환영 / YOON AGAIN / STOP THE STEAL / CCP OUT / MAKE KOREA GREAT AGAIN /


전재수 민주당 부산시장 후보에 대해 검경합동수사본부가 "무혐의" 처분했습니다. 이재명대통령의 5개 재판을 모두 중단 시킨데 비하면 그리 놀랄 일은 아니겠습니다만, 역시나 "이재명 민주당 무죄, 야당 유죄"네요. 이재명 경기지사의 대북불법송금사건을 덮기 위해 박상용검사를 직무정지시키고 탄압하고 있습니다. 이재명대통령의 범죄를 덮기 위해 아예 "검찰청을 통째로 폐지"시켜버리고, 그래도 도둑이 제발 저린지 <검사ㆍ판사처벌법> <4심제 도입> <대법관 증원법> "사법파괴 3법"을 날치기 통과시켰습니다. "윗물이 범죄자니 아랫물도 범죄자 천지"입니다. 범죄자가 검찰청을 폐지하고, 판사도 처벌하는 "적반하장"의 <도둑천국>을 만들고 있습니다.








South Korea’s most widely used messaging app, KakaoTalk, which serves over 47 million people, has come under scrutiny for blocking specific political keywords associated with conservative causes and former President Yoon Suk-yeol. Terms such as “Yoon Again,” “Freedom and Innovation,” “CPAC,” “conservative,” “Election Fraud,” and “sovereignty restoration” are reportedly filtered in group chats, while keywords linked to President Lee Jae-myung and the ruling Democratic Party face no such restrictions. The pattern was documented through screen recordings by a verified member of the opposition Freedom and Innovation Party. This development occurs amid South Korea’s highly polarized political climate following the 2024 martial law crisis, Yoon Suk-yeol’s impeachment, and the 2025 transition to the Lee Jae-myung administration. KakaoTalk functions as the primary platform for daily communication, social coordination, and political discussion for nearly the entire population. When a near-monopoly messaging service appears to limit certain political expressions while allowing others, it raises serious questions about freedom of speech and platform impartiality in digital public spaces. In today’s digital society, messaging applications have become essential public forums. Selective filtering by a dominant platform can significantly shape how citizens exchange ideas and participate in democratic debate. Do you believe major tech platforms like KakaoTalk have a responsibility to ensure complete political neutrality in their filtering systems, or is some level of content moderation necessary to maintain order?






















